IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ilrrev/v53y1999i1p21-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of the Survival of Gainsharing Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Dong-One Kim

Abstract

Using data from a 1992 survey of 211 organizations with gainsharing experience, the author examines determinants of the survival of gainsharing. He finds statistically significant associations between program survival and several factors, including employee approval by vote, union participation in program administration, low reliance on outside consultants, re-training, new employee training, small bonus group, labor intensity, sound corporate financial health, and major capital investment. Also positively correlated with program survival was program performance (the degree of success in achieving program goals), but that association was considerably weaker for young programs than for older ones. Variables such as re-training, new employee training, small bonus group, and good corporate financial health affected program survival via their influence on program performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong-One Kim, 1999. "Determinants of the Survival of Gainsharing Programs," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 53(1), pages 21-42, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:53:y:1999:i:1:p:21-42
    DOI: 10.1177/001979399905300102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/001979399905300102
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/001979399905300102?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger T. Kaufman, 1992. "The Effects of Improshare on Productivity," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 45(2), pages 311-322, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Azman ISMAIL & Mohammad Fuad ZAIDI & Aimi ANUAR, 2015. "Administrator’S Role In Performance Based Reward As A Determinant Of Employee Outcomes," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 92-110, May.
    2. Leonardo Fernando Cruz Basso & Edilson Gonçalves Teixeira & Diógenes Manoel Leiva Martin, 2005. "Factors That Influence Operating Performance Through The Use Of Earnings Or Gainsharing Plans: Evidence In Brazil'S Chemical Industry," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 4(1), pages 13-100, Marzo 200.
    3. Colin Green & John S. Heywood, 2008. "Does Performance Pay Increase Job Satisfaction?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 75(300), pages 710-728, November.
    4. Azman Ismail & Anis Anisah Abdullah, 2016. "Administration Of Reward For Individual Performance As A Predictor Of Organizational Commitments," Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, University of Tuzla, Faculty of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 7-17, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan Helper & Morris M. Kleiner, 2009. "International Differences in Lean Production, Productivity, and Employee Attitudes," NBER Chapters, in: International Differences in the Business Practices and Productivity of Firms, pages 231-261, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Roger T. Kaufman & Raymond Russell, 1995. "GOVERNMENT SUPPORT FOR PROFIT SHARING, GAINSHARING, ESOPs, AND TQM," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 13(2), pages 38-48, April.
    3. Park, Rhokeun, 2012. "Cognitive and affective approaches to employee participation: Integration of the two approaches," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 450-458.
    4. Douglas L. Kruse, 1993. "Does Profit Sharing Affect Productivity?," NBER Working Papers 4542, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Joel Rogers, 1995. "United States: Lessons from Abroad and Home," NBER Chapters, in: Works Councils: Consultation, Representation, and Cooperation in Industrial Relations, pages 375-410, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Leonardo Fernando Cruz Basso & Edilson Gonçalves Teixeira & Diógenes Manoel Leiva Martin, 2005. "Factors That Influence Operating Performance Through The Use Of Earnings Or Gainsharing Plans: Evidence In Brazil'S Chemical Industry," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 4(1), pages 13-100, Marzo 200.
    7. Cemal Zehir & Dogan Basar, 2016. "The Relation between Learning Orientation and Variables of Firm Performance with Strategic Human Resources Management Applications in the Islamic Banks in Turkey," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(3), pages 40-52, March.
    8. Ann C. Frost, 2000. "Explaining Variation in Workplace Restructuring: The Role of Local Union Capabilities," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 53(4), pages 559-578, July.
    9. Derek C. Jones & Takao Kato & Jeffrey Pliskin, 1994. "Profit Sharing and Gainsharing: A Review of Theory, Incidence, and Effects," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_125, Levy Economics Institute.
    10. Bernd J. Frick & Ute Goetzen & Robert Simmons, 2013. "The Hidden Costs of High-Performance Work Practices: Evidence from a Large German Steel Company," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 66(1), pages 198-224, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ilrrev:v:53:y:1999:i:1:p:21-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ilr.cornell.edu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.