IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aio/manmar/vxiiiy2015i1p92-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Administrator’S Role In Performance Based Reward As A Determinant Of Employee Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Azman ISMAIL

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

  • Mohammad Fuad ZAIDI

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

  • Aimi ANUAR

    (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia)

Abstract

According to the recent literature pertaining on workplace compensation program, administrators often play two important roles in planning and implementing performance based reward: communication and performance appraisal. Recent studies in this field highlights that the ability of administrators to appropriately communicate pay information and appraise employee performance may have a significant impact on employee outcomes, especially job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the relationship between administrator’s role in performance based reward and employee outcomes using self-administered questionnaires collected from employees at a district council in Malaysia. The outcomes of the SmartPLS path model analysis showed that pay communication does not act as an important determinant of job satisfaction, but performance appraisal does act as an important determinant of job satisfaction. Conversely, both pay communication and performance appraisal act as important determinants of organizational commitment. Hence, discussion, implications and conclusion are elaborated.

Suggested Citation

  • Azman ISMAIL & Mohammad Fuad ZAIDI & Aimi ANUAR, 2015. "Administrator’S Role In Performance Based Reward As A Determinant Of Employee Outcomes," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 92-110, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:aio:manmar:v:xiii:y:2015:i:1:p:92-110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mnmk.ro/documents/2015_X1/8-7-1-15.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. W.D. McCausland & K. Pouliakas & I. Theodossiou, 2005. "Some are Punished and Some are Rewarded: A Study of the Impact of Performance Pay on Job Satisfaction," Labor and Demography 0505019, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Dong-One Kim, 1999. "Determinants of the Survival of Gainsharing Programs," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 53(1), pages 21-42, October.
    3. Keith A. Bender, 2003. "Examining Equality between Public- and Private-Sector Wage Distributions," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 41(1), pages 62-79, January.
    4. R Bruce Money & John L Graham, 1999. "Salesperson Performance, Pay, and Job Satisfaction: Tests of a Model Using Data Collected in the United States and Japan," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 30(1), pages 149-172, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colin Green & John S. Heywood, 2008. "Does Performance Pay Increase Job Satisfaction?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 75(300), pages 710-728, November.
    2. Azman ISMAIL & Nurhana M RAFIUDDIN & Mohd Hamran MOHAMAD & Norashikin Sahol HAMID & Aniza WAMIN & Nurzawani ZAKARIA, 2011. "Performance Based Pay As A Determinant Of Job Satisfaction: A Study In Malaysia Giatmara Centers," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(1), pages 77-88, May.
    3. Azman Ismail & Anis Anisah Abdullah, 2016. "Administration Of Reward For Individual Performance As A Predictor Of Organizational Commitments," Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, University of Tuzla, Faculty of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 7-17, November.
    4. Gorodnichenko, Yuriy & Sabirianova Peter, Klara, 2007. "Public sector pay and corruption: Measuring bribery from micro data," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(5-6), pages 963-991, June.
    5. Cueto, Begona & Pruneda, Gabriel, 2015. "Job Satisfaction of Wage and Self-Employed workers. Do preferences make a difference?," MPRA Paper 65432, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Lixin Cai & Amy Y.C. Liu, 2008. "Public-Private Wage Gap in Australia: Variation Along the Distribution," CEPR Discussion Papers 581, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    7. repec:lan:wpaper:2928 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Qi Wei & Chris Rowley, 2008. "Changing patterns of rewards in Asia: a literature review," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 489-506, September.
    9. John S. Heywood & Daniel Parent, 2012. "Performance Pay and the White-Black Wage Gap," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(2), pages 249-290.
    10. Mari Kangasniemi, 2012. "Job satisfaction and wage dispersion," Working Papers 278, Työn ja talouden tutkimus LABORE, The Labour Institute for Economic Research LABORE.
    11. Tansel, Aysit & Keskin, Halil Ibrahim & Ozdemir, Zeynel Abidin, 2008. "Public versus Private Sector Wage Gap in Egypt: Evidence from Quantile Regression on Panel Data," MPRA Paper 89540, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Snežana Lekić & Jelena Vapa-Tankosić & Slavica Mandić & Jasmina Rajaković-Mijailović & Nemanja Lekić & Jelena Mijailović, 2020. "Analysis of the Quality of the Employee–Bank Relationship in Urban and Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-22, July.
    13. Pouliakas, Konstantinos, 2008. "Pay enough, don’t pay too much or don’t pay at all? An empirical study of the non-monotonic impact of incentives on job satisfaction," MPRA Paper 10031, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Pouliakas, Konstantinos & Theodossiou, Ioannis, 2009. "Confronting Objections to Performance Pay: A Study of the Impact of Individual and Gain-sharing Incentives on the Job Satisfaction of British Employees," MPRA Paper 14244, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. Jelena Lausev, 2014. "WHAT HAS 20 YEARS OF PUBLIC–PRIVATE PAY GAP LITERATURE TOLD US? EASTERN EUROPEAN TRANSITIONING vs. DEVELOPED ECONOMIES," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 516-550, July.
    16. Azman Ismail & Dayang Kartini Abang Ibrahim & Antonia Girardi, 2009. "The mediating effect of distributive justice in the relationship between pay design and job satisfaction," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 27(1), pages 129-148.
    17. Ilija Coric & Katija Vojvodic, 2015. "Variable Pay: A Case Study In Warehouse Logistics," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 15, pages 189-200.
    18. Maczulskij, Terhi & Haapanen, Mika & Kauhanen, Antti & Riukula, Krista, 2021. "Dark Half: Decentralized Bargaining and Well-Being at Work," IZA Discussion Papers 14654, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. AZMAN Ismail & MOHD RIDWAN Abd Razak, 2017. "Performance-Based Reward Administration Enhancing Employees’ Feelings Of Interactional Justice," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 12(1), pages 5-18, April.
    20. Morikawa, Masayuki, 2016. "A comparison of the wage structure between the public and private sectors in Japan," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 73-90.
    21. Mallin, Michael L. & Asree, Susita & Koh, Anthony C. & Hu, Michael Y., 2010. "Antecedents to managerial trust and sales control in Malaysian salesforce," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 292-305, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pay communication; performance appraisal; job satisfaction; organizational commitment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M51 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Firm Employment Decisions; Promotions
    • M54 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Personnel Economics - - - Labor Management

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aio:manmar:v:xiii:y:2015:i:1:p:92-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin Barbu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fecraro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.