IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0234444.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The future of feedback: Motivating performance improvement through future-focused feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Jackie Gnepp
  • Joshua Klayman
  • Ian O Williamson
  • Sema Barlas

Abstract

Managerial feedback discussions often fail to produce the desired performance improvements. Three studies shed light on why performance feedback fails and how it can be made more effective. In Study 1, managers described recent performance feedback experiences in their work settings. In Studies 2 and 3, pairs of managers role-played a performance review meeting. In all studies, recipients of mixed and negative feedback doubted the accuracy of the feedback and the providers’ qualifications to give it. Disagreement regarding past performance was greater following the feedback discussion than before, due to feedback recipients’ increased self-protective and self-enhancing attributions. Managers were motivated to improve to the extent they perceived the feedback conversation to be focused on future actions rather than on past performance. Our findings have implications for the theory and practice of performance management.

Suggested Citation

  • Jackie Gnepp & Joshua Klayman & Ian O Williamson & Sema Barlas, 2020. "The future of feedback: Motivating performance improvement through future-focused feedback," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234444
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234444
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234444
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0234444&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0234444?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Angelo S. DeNisi & Robert D. Pritchard, 2006. "Performance Appraisal, Performance Management and Improving Individual Performance: A Motivational Framework," Management and Organization Review, The International Association for Chinese Management Research, vol. 2(2), pages 253-277, July.
    2. Audia, Pino G. & Brion, Sebastien, 2007. "Reluctant to change: Self-enhancing responses to diverging performance measures," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 255-269, March.
    3. Christoph W Korn & Gabriela Rosenblau & Julia M Rodriguez Buritica & Hauke R Heekeren, 2016. "Performance Feedback Processing Is Positively Biased As Predicted by Attribution Theory," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    4. Gioia, Dennis A. & Sims, Henry P., 1986. "Cognition-behavior connections: Attribution and verbal behavior in leader-subordinate interactions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 197-229, April.
    5. Buehler, Roger & Griffin, Dale, 2003. "Planning, personality, and prediction: The role of future focus in optimistic time predictions," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-2), pages 80-90.
    6. DeNisi, Angelo S. & Pritchard, Robert D., 2006. "Performance Appraisal, Performance Management and Improving Individual Performance: A Motivational Framework," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(2), pages 253-277, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sajid Hussain Awan & Nazia Habib & Chaudhry Shoaib Akhtar & Shaheryar Naveed, 2020. "Effectiveness of Performance Management System for Employee Performance Through Engagement," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    2. Decramer, Adelien & Audenaert, Mieke & Van Waeyenberg, Thomas & Claeys, Tine & Claes, Claudia & Vandevelde, Stijn & van Loon, Jos & Crucke, Saskia, 2015. "Does performance management affect nurses’ well-being?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 98-105.
    3. Houldsworth, Elizabeth & Marra, Marianna & Brewster, Chris & Brookes, Michael & Wood, Geoffrey, 2021. "Performance appraisal and MNEs: The impact of different capitalist archetypes," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(5).
    4. Hada Izabela Diana & Burja Vasile, 2018. "Interference Between Profit And Cash-Flow In Evaluating Economic Performance," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 3, pages 96-101, June.
    5. Bayo-Moriones, Alberto & Galdon-Sanchez, Jose Enrique & Martinez-de-Morentin, Sara, 2016. "Competitive Strategy, Performance Appraisal and Firm Results," IZA Discussion Papers 10041, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Emanuele Gabriel Margherita & Ilenia Bua, 2021. "The Role of Human Resource Practices for the Development of Operator 4.0 in Industry 4.0 Organisations: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, April.
    7. Rajesh Kumar Upadhyay & Khaliqur Rehman Ansari & Pankaj Bijalwan, 2020. "Performance Appraisal and Team Effectiveness: A Moderated Mediation Model of Employee Retention and Employee Satisfaction," Vision, , vol. 24(4), pages 395-405, December.
    8. Rawan Alafeshat & Cem Tanova, 2019. "Servant Leadership Style and High-Performance Work System Practices: Pathway to a Sustainable Jordanian Airline Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    9. Donghun Yoon, 2021. "How Can Personnel Performance Evaluation Systems Be Improved?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    10. Flora F. T. Chiang & Thomas A. Birtch, 2010. "Appraising Performance across Borders: An Empirical Examination of the Purposes and Practices of Performance Appraisal in a Multi‐Country Context," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(7), pages 1365-1393, November.
    11. Anupriya Singh & Tanuja Agarwala, 2011. "Software Services Industry Context and Performance Management," Vision, , vol. 15(1), pages 49-59, March.
    12. S. Panda* & M. Waris & K. Asadullah & U. Mehfooz & A. Q. Adeleke, 2018. "Analyzing Factors Attributing To Effectiveness of Performance Management System of a Manufacturing Industry," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 907-914:6.
    13. Dilbar Hassan Ch & Rakhshanda Maqsood & Snawer Gill, 2018. "A Study of a Casual relationship between Performance Appraisal and Employee’s Performance: Evidence from the Textile Sector in Faisalabad," Journal of Education and Vocational Research, AMH International, vol. 9(1), pages 44-50.
    14. Md Murad Miah & Dr Nor Intan Adha Hafit, 2019. "A Proposed Framework Model of the Relationship between Organizational Culture, Work Engagement, and Employee Performance at Airasia Berhad," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 9(4), pages 69-78, December.
    15. Rajib Narayan Sahu & Lalatendu Kesari Jena & Subhas Chandra Parida, 2014. "Performance Management System as a Predictor of Organizational Effectiveness: Insights from Indian Manufacturing Industries," Jindal Journal of Business Research, , vol. 3(1-2), pages 137-152, June.
    16. Selvarajan, T.T. & Singh, Barjinder & Solansky, Stephanie, 2018. "Performance appraisal fairness, leader member exchange and motivation to improve performance: A study of US and Mexican employees," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 142-154.
    17. Outila, Virpi & Fey, Carl F., 2022. "“We have performance appraisal every day and every hour”: Transferring performance management to Russia," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(2).
    18. HADA Izabela Diana & MIHALCEA Mihaela Maria, 2020. "The Importance Of Profitability Indicators In Assessing The Financial Performance Of Economic Entities," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 219-228, July.
    19. Ida Nuraida, 2017. "Employee Performance Management Framework for Medium-Sized Enterprises of Agrotourism Sector," Noble International Journal of Business and Management Research, Noble Academic Publsiher, vol. 1(4), pages 74-93, April.
    20. Navin Gazanchand Matookchund & Renier Steyn, 2020. "Performance Appraisal as an Antecedent to Innovation: an Analysis of Its Relative Importance," International Journal of Human Resource Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(2), pages 120-120, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0234444. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.