IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/edt/jsserr/v10y2023i1p212-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Sector Performance Management: The Shift From Annual Performance Review To Regular Feedback

Author

Listed:
  • Bonson Alemu Hambissa

    (PhD Candidate, Department of Public Management and Policy, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia)

  • Worku Mekonnen Tadesse

    (PhD, Department of Business Leadership, School of Commerce, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia)

  • Gemechu Ararssa Regassa

    (PhD, Department of Public Administration, Oromia State University, Ethiopia)

Abstract

Feedback is an integral part of performance management system. It is about accessing the work that needs to be done and providing opportunities for performance improvement and professional development. Consequently, many public sector organizations aims to promote a high-performing culture and aspire to rely on continuous feedback as a significant part of their performance management system. Nonetheless, they fail to apply the continuous performance feedback and stick to the old year-end evaluation. The year-end one time overall performance evaluation is late and less powerful to result in learning and performance improvement. For example, feedback given on December for January's performance will have less corrective power. Hence, this review is intended to shade light on the need to shift from the old annual performance evaluation to regular performance feedback in public sector organizations. Accordingly, pertinent theoretical and empirical works were consulted. Many private sector organizations are switching from single annual evaluation to a culture of continuous conversations with meaningful performance feedback while most public sector organizations are still using the old annual performance management approach. Hence, public sector organizations need to shift to continuous performance feedback with regular check-ins for it allow managers and job owners quickly tackle issues before they become problems and fosters a forward-looking conversation by emphasizing continued feedback that is in the moment and frequent. It also help to create a culture where people are comfortable giving feedback up, down, and across an organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Bonson Alemu Hambissa & Worku Mekonnen Tadesse & Gemechu Ararssa Regassa, 2023. "Public Sector Performance Management: The Shift From Annual Performance Review To Regular Feedback," Social Sciences and Education Research Review, Department of Communication, Journalism and Education Sciences, University of Craiova, vol. 10(1), pages 212-217, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:212-217
    DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.8151121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://sserr.ro/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/sserr-10-1-212-217.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5281/zenodo.8151121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jackie Gnepp & Joshua Klayman & Ian O Williamson & Sema Barlas, 2020. "The future of feedback: Motivating performance improvement through future-focused feedback," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, June.
    2. Sajid Hussain Awan & Nazia Habib & Chaudhry Shoaib Akhtar & Shaheryar Naveed, 2020. "Effectiveness of Performance Management System for Employee Performance Through Engagement," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    3. Aymen Asif & Kashif Rathore, 2021. "Behavioral Drivers of Performance in Public-Sector Organizations: A Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440219, February.
    4. Teresa Curristine & Zsuzsanna Lonti & Isabelle Joumard, 2007. "Improving Public Sector Efficiency: Challenges and Opportunities," OECD Journal on Budgeting, OECD Publishing, vol. 7(1), pages 1-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iwona Franczak, 2021. "Creative Accounting in Poland’s Sub-Sector of Local Governments," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4 - Part ), pages 997-1017.
    2. Martins, José & Marques, Rui Cunha & Cruz, Carlos Oliveira, 2014. "Maximizing the value for money of PPP arrangements through flexibility: An application to airports," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 72-80.
    3. Norman Gemmell & Patrick Nolan & Grant Scobie, 2017. "Public sector productivity: Quality adjusting sector-level data on New Zealand schools," Working Papers 2017/02, New Zealand Productivity Commission.
    4. Tommaso Agasisti & Francesco Porcelli, 2019. "Local governments’ efficiency and its heterogeneity – empirical evidence from a Stochastic Frontier Analysis of Italian municipalities 2010-2015," Working papers 81, Società Italiana di Economia Pubblica.
    5. Jose M. Cordero & Cristina Polo & Nickolaos G. Tzeremes, 2020. "Evaluating the efficiency of municipalities in the presence of unobserved heterogeneity," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 377-390, June.
    6. Qiufang Li & Hui Xia, 2025. "Reporting Only the Good News but Not the Bad? Mechanism of Negative Performance Feedback," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 5346-5370, March.
    7. Christodoulos K. Akrivos, 2019. "Managers’ Perception on Public Organizations’ Performance and New Public Management during Economic Crises," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(3), pages 57-69.
    8. Karin Fischer & Rauf Gönenç & Robert Price, 2011. "Austria: Public Sector Inefficiencies Have Become Less Affordable," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 897, OECD Publishing.
    9. Suresh Chand Aggarwal & Divya Satija & Shuheb Khan, 2019. "Inclusive Growth in India – Learning from Best Practices of Selected Countries," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER) Working Paper 375, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi, India.
    10. Martina Halaskova & Renata Halaskova & Viktor Prokop, 2018. "Evaluation of Efficiency in Selected Areas of Public Services in European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    11. Asatryan, Zareh & Heinemann, Friedrich & Yeter, Mustafa & Rubio, Eulalia & Rinaldi, David & Zuleeg, Fabian, 2016. "Public sector reform: How the EU budget is used to encourage it. Study," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, number 147039.
    12. Boris Cournède & Antoine Goujard & Álvaro Pina, 2013. "How to Achieve Growth- and Equity-friendly Fiscal Consolidation?: A Proposed Methodology for Instrument Choice with an Illustrative Application to OECD Countries," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 1088, OECD Publishing.
    13. Michael Sunday Agba & Stephen I. Ocheni, 2019. "Decentralised vs Centralised Human Resource Development in Nigeria: A Mixture of Experience/ Lessons from HRD Programmes in the Public and Private Sector," Logos Universalitate Mentalitate Educatie Noutate - Sectiunea Stiinte Sociale/ Logos Universality Mentality Education Novelty - Section: Social Sciences, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Liudmila Tkachenko, 2020. "Public Finance Management: Challenges and Opportunities," Athens Journal of Business & Economics, Athens Institute for Education and Research (ATINER), vol. 6(1), pages 73-98, January.
    15. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:4:p:997-1017 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Min-Hyuk Cho & Chan-Goo Yi, 2022. "Adaptive Social Innovation Derived from Digital Economy and Its Impact on Society and Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Ardvin Kester S. Ong & Yogi Tri Prasetyo & Ralph Andre C. Roque & Jan Gabriel I. Garbo & Kirstien Paola E. Robas & Satria Fadil Persada & Reny Nadlifatin, 2022. "Determining the Factors Affecting a Career Shifter’s Use of Software Testing Tools amidst the COVID-19 Crisis in the Philippines: TTF-TAM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, September.
    18. repec:uii:journl:v:10:y:2018:i:1:p:32-39 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Asatryan, Zareh & Heinemann, Friedrich & Pitlik, Hans, 2017. "Reforming the public administration: The role of crisis and the power of bureaucracy," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 128-143.
    20. Hans Pitlik & Kristina Budimir & Norbert Gruber, 2010. "Optionen einer ausgabenseitigen Budgetkonsolidierung," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 83(3), pages 247-267, March.
    21. Muhammad Aizat Azhari & Onaliza Satimin, 2024. "Evaluating English Language Education for Career Readiness in Intercultural Communication: Employer Insights and Recommendations," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(10), pages 2923-2934, October.
    22. Jackson, Emerson Abraham, 2020. "Importance of the Public Service in Achieving the UN SDGs," MPRA Paper 101806, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 02 Jun 2020.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:edt:jsserr:v:10:y:2023:i:1:p:212-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dan Valeriu Voinea (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://cis01.central.ucv.ro/litere/cadr_juridic/departament_comunicare_jurnalism_stiinte_ale_educatiei/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.