Author
Abstract
Through recent years, much has been said about the importance of sustainability in corporate strategy, and multinational corporations abiding by the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDG’s). More and more corporations try to integrate sustainability principles, otherwise known as ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) into their marketing, corporate strategy, and business models. There’s often a clash between non-governmental organizations (NGO’s), civil society, governments, and the private sector on what ESG best practices are, with some calling “greenwashing” some environmental-related actions companies are taking. This paper tries to tackle the first question in this challenge- what is sustainability in business? How individuals in different parts of the world are defining sustainability and how that may help corporations better address their ESG strategy to the market needs. The question is addressed using a discrete choice model, to understand the utility functions of sustainability parameters. Those parameters were defined by a meta-analysis of 200 scientific papers on sustainability. The survey for the discrete choice model was made available online, in seven languages, and it was completed by 501 individuals across 41 countries. Among the parameters researched, sustainable development goals adoption, followed by positive economic impact had the highest utility values. The lowest utility values were attributed to donations and racial equality. A disparity between what one would expect from stated preferences is seen in racial equality, as it ranked 4th in terms of preferences. On the same token, donations ranked last, in line with the utility value.
Suggested Citation
Filipe Pohlmann Gonzaga, 2025.
"What Is Sustainability in Business? A Discrete Choice Model Experiment,"
Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(3), pages 143-143, May.
Handle:
RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:143
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:143. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.