IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i7p1241-d104833.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Precision Farming Scenarios Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps

Author

Listed:
  • Asmaa Mourhir

    (Computer Science Department, School of Science and Engineering, Al Akhawayn University in Ifrane, Ifrane 53000, Morocco)

  • Elpiniki I. Papageorgiou

    (Computer Engineering Department, Technological Education Institute (TEI) of Sterea Ellada, Lamia 35100, Greece
    Computer Science Department, University of Thessaly, Lamia 35131, Greece)

  • Konstantinos Kokkinos

    (Computer Science Department, University of Thessaly, Lamia 35131, Greece)

  • Tajjeeddine Rachidi

    (Computer Science Department, School of Science and Engineering, Al Akhawayn University in Ifrane, Ifrane 53000, Morocco)

Abstract

One of the major problems confronted in precision agriculture is uncertainty about how exactly would yield in a certain area respond to decreased application of certain nutrients. One way to deal with this type of uncertainty is the use of scenarios as a method to explore future projections from current objectives and constraints. In the absence of data, soft computing techniques can be used as effective semi-quantitative methods to produce scenario simulations, based on a consistent set of conditions. In this work, we propose a dynamic rule-based Fuzzy Cognitive Map variant to perform simulations, where the novelty resides in an enhanced forward inference algorithm with reasoning that is characterized by magnitudes of change and effects. The proposed method leverages expert knowledge to provide an estimation of crop yield, and hence it can enable farmers to gain insights about how yield varies across a field, so they can determine how to adapt fertilizer application accordingly. It allows also producing simulations that can be used by managers to identify effects of increasing or decreasing fertilizers on yield, and hence it can facilitate the adoption of precision agriculture regulations by farmers. We present an illustrative example to predict cotton yield change, as a response to stimulated management options using proactive scenarios, based on decreasing Phosphorus, Potassium and Nitrogen. The results of the case study revealed that decreasing the three nutrients by half does not decrease yield by more than 10%.

Suggested Citation

  • Asmaa Mourhir & Elpiniki I. Papageorgiou & Konstantinos Kokkinos & Tajjeeddine Rachidi, 2017. "Exploring Precision Farming Scenarios Using Fuzzy Cognitive Maps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1241-:d:104833
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/7/1241/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/7/1241/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. De la Rosa, JM. & Conesa, MR. & Domingo, R. & Aguayo, E. & Falagán, N. & Pérez-Pastor, A., 2016. "Combined effects of deficit irrigation and crop level on early nectarine trees," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 120-132.
    2. Enikő Lencsés & István Takács & Katalin Takács-György, 2014. "Farmers’ Perception of Precision Farming Technology among Hungarian Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(12), pages 1-14, November.
    3. McBride, William D. & Daberkow, Stan G., 2003. "Information And The Adoption Of Precision Farming Technologies," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 21(1), pages 1-18.
    4. Jon T. Biermacher & B. Wade Brorsen & Francis M. Epplin & John B. Solie & William R. Raun, 2009. "The economic potential of precision nitrogen application with wheat based on plant sensing," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 40(4), pages 397-407, July.
    5. Puerto, P. & Domingo, R. & Torres, R. & Pérez-Pastor, A. & García-Riquelme, M., 2013. "Remote management of deficit irrigation in almond trees based on maximum daily trunk shrinkage. Water relations and yield," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 33-45.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chin-Ling Lee & Robert Strong & Kim E. Dooley, 2021. "Analyzing Precision Agriculture Adoption across the Globe: A Systematic Review of Scholarship from 1999–2020," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Kunruthai Meechang & Kenji Watanabe, 2023. "Modeling to Achieve Area Business Continuity Management Implementation via a Fuzzy Cognitive Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    3. Li Bin & Muhammad Shahzad & Hira Khan & Muhammad Mehran Bashir & Arif Ullah & Muhammad Siddique, 2023. "Sustainable Smart Agriculture Farming for Cotton Crop: A Fuzzy Logic Rule Based Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Pramod K Singh & Harpalsinh Chudasama, 2020. "Evaluating poverty alleviation strategies in a developing country," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Anna Adamus-Matuszyńska & Jerzy Michnik & Grzegorz Polok, 2019. "A Systemic Approach to City Image Building. The Case of Katowice City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. J Blasch & B van der Kroon & P van Beukering & R Munster & S Fabiani & P Nino & S Vanino, 2022. "Farmer preferences for adopting precision farming technologies: a case study from Italy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 49(1), pages 33-81.
    2. Temnani, Abdelmalek & Berríos, Pablo & Zapata-García, Susana & Pérez-Pastor, Alejandro, 2023. "Deficit irrigation strategies of flat peach trees under semi-arid conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    3. López-Riquelme, J.A. & Pavón-Pulido, N. & Navarro-Hellín, H. & Soto-Valles, F. & Torres-Sánchez, R., 2017. "A software architecture based on FIWARE cloud for Precision Agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 123-135.
    4. Conesa, María R. & Conejero, Wenceslao & Vera, Juan & Agulló, Vicente & García-Viguera, Cristina & Ruiz-Sánchez, M. Carmen, 2021. "Irrigation management practices in nectarine fruit quality at harvest and after cold storage," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. De la Rosa, J.M. & Domingo, R. & Gómez-Montiel, J. & Pérez-Pastor, A., 2015. "Implementing deficit irrigation scheduling through plant water stress indicators in early nectarine trees," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 207-216.
    6. Takács-György, Katalin, 2015. "Chemical Use In Crop Production – Can It Be Reduced By New Technologies?," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2015(3), June.
    7. Tumusiime, Emmanuel & B. Wade, Brorsen & Mosali, Jagadeesh & Johnson, Jim & Locke, James & Biermacher, Jon T., 2011. "Determining Optimal Levels of Nitrogen Fertilizer Using Random Parameter Models," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(4), pages 541-552, November.
    8. Matthew Houser, 2022. "Does adopting a nitrogen best management practice reduce nitrogen fertilizer rates?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 79-94, March.
    9. Ali, Jabir, 2011. "Adoption of Mass Media Information for Decision-Making Among Vegetable Growers in Uttar Pradesh," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 66(2), pages 1-14.
    10. Jenkins, Amanda & Velandia, Margarita & Lambert, Dayton M. & Roberts, Roland K. & Larson, James A. & English, Burton C. & Martin, Steven W., 2011. "Factors Influencing the Selection of Precision Farming Information Sources by Cotton Producers," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 307-320, September.
    11. Agüero Alcaras, L. Martín & Rousseaux, M. Cecilia & Searles, Peter S., 2021. "Yield and water productivity responses of olive trees (cv. Manzanilla) to post-harvest deficit irrigation in a non-Mediterranean climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    12. Vecchio, Yari & De Rosa, Marcello & Adinolfi, Felice & Bartoli, Luca & Masi, Margherita, 2020. "Adoption of precision farming tools: A context-related analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    13. Kristina Beethem & Sandra T. Marquart-Pyatt & Jennifer Lai & Tian Guo, 2023. "Navigating the information landscape: public and private information source access by midwest farmers," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(3), pages 1117-1135, September.
    14. Asare, Eric & Segarra, Eduardo, 2017. "Adoption and Extent of Adoption of Georeferenced Grid Soil Sampling Technology by Cotton Producers in the Southern US," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252773, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    15. Chowdhury, Iftekhar Uddin Ahmed & Wang, Tong & Jin, Hailong & Smart, Alexander J., 2020. "Exploring the Determinants of Perceived Benefits of Rotational Grazing in the U. S. Great Plains," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304487, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Ng'ombe, John, 2019. "Economics of the Greenseeder Hand Planter, Discrete Choice Modeling, and On-Farm Field Experimentation," Thesis Commons jckt7, Center for Open Science.
    17. Ranjan, Ram, 2007. "Technology Adoption Against Invasive Species," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 39(Special), pages 1-14, October.
    18. López, Juan A. & Navarro, H. & Soto, F. & Pavón, N. & Suardíaz, J. & Torres, R., 2015. "GAIA2: A multifunctional wireless device for enhancing crop management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 75-86.
    19. Ali, Mir B. & McBride, William D. & Daberkow, Stan G., 2003. "Implications Of Remote Sensing Imagery And Crop Rotation For Nitrogen Management In Sugar Beet Production," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22052, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Navarro-Hellín, H. & Torres-Sánchez, R. & Soto-Valles, F. & Albaladejo-Pérez, C. & López-Riquelme, J.A. & Domingo-Miguel, R., 2015. "A wireless sensors architecture for efficient irrigation water management," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 64-74.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:7:p:1241-:d:104833. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.