IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9378-d1777076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Taxation, Trade Liberalization and Natural Resource Utilization

Author

Listed:
  • Dandan Qi

    (Institute of Business Economics, Harbin University of Commerce, No. 1, Xuehai Street, Songbei District, Harbin 150028, China)

  • Weicheng Zhang

    (School of Economics, Harbin University of Commerce, No. 1, Xuehai Street, Songbei District, Harbin 150028, China)

Abstract

Environmental protection is an essential path to achieving high-quality economic development, and green tax policies are an effective means of achieving environmental protection. This study categorizes green tax policies into environmental protection-oriented green tax policies, resource-oriented green tax policies, and guidance-oriented green tax policies based on the nature of the tax. The fixed-effect model, the system GMM model and the continuous DID model are used to explore the causal relationship between the overall green tax policy, the classified green tax policy and the use of natural resources. The spatial Durbin model is used to explore the spatial spillover effect of the green tax policy and the regional heterogeneity in the east, central, west and northeast of China. Finally, the role of trade openness in the relationship between the green tax policy and natural resource use is explored. The research results show that (1) the green tax policy has a positive effect on natural resource use, but the green tax policy in the previous period has no promoting effect, and the natural resource use in the previous period has a positive impact on the current period. Among them, there is no causal relationship between the resource-occupying green tax and natural resource use. (2) All three types of green tax policies studied in this paper have spatial spillover effects, but the spillover effects of the three types of green tax policies are relatively small in the eastern region. The spillover effects of the three types of green tax policies in the central region are significantly negative. In the western region, only the guiding green tax policy has a spillover effect. In the northeastern region, the environmental protection green tax policy and the resource-based green tax policy are significantly negative, while the guiding green tax spillover effect is significantly positive. (3) In the mechanism test, the guiding green tax policy has an impact on natural resource utilization through trade openness, while the environmental protection green tax policy and the resource-based green tax policy cannot affect natural resource utilization through the level of trade openness. Finally, based on the research conclusions, policy recommendations are proposed from the perspectives of policy timeliness, tax structure adjustment, and trade network optimization to maximize economic benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Dandan Qi & Weicheng Zhang, 2025. "Green Taxation, Trade Liberalization and Natural Resource Utilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-34, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9378-:d:1777076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9378/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9378/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Song, Yanan & Hua, Xiaolong, 2024. "The role of carbon taxation in promoting a green economy for sustainability: Optimizing natural resource efficiency," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Hu, Xiurong & Pollitt, Hector & Pirie, Jamie & Mercure, Jean-Francois & Liu, Junfeng & Meng, Jing & Tao, Shu, 2020. "The impacts of the trade liberalization of environmental goods on power system and CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    3. Ian Sheldon, 2006. "Trade and Environmental Policy: A Race to the Bottom?," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 365-392, September.
    4. Bo Li & Fei Xing & Mark Yu, 2018. "Upstream Pricing Schemes, Trade Liberalization, Trade and Environmental Policies of Downstream Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Yu, Xiang, 2023. "An assessment of the green development efficiency of industrial parks in China: Based on non-desired output and non-radial DEA model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 81-88.
    6. Kaika, Dimitra & Zervas, Efthimios, 2013. "The Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) theory—Part A: Concept, causes and the CO2 emissions case," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1392-1402.
    7. Blundell, Richard & Bond, Stephen, 1998. "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 115-143, August.
    8. Cheng, Dong & Zhou, Hongqin & Guo, Debing & He, Yingchao, 2024. "Green Knot: trade openness and digital commerce contribute to the natural resources," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Gabriel Felbermayr & Sonja Peterson & Joschka Wanner, 2025. "Trade and the environment, trade policies and environmental policies—How do they interact?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(3), pages 1148-1184, July.
    10. Cheng, Yue & Zhao, Gongyan & Meng, Wentao & Wang, Qianrong, 2024. "Resources utilization, taxation and green education: A path to sustainable power generation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    11. Sami Ullah & Rundong Luo & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo & Mustafa Tevfik Kartal, 2023. "Dynamics between environmental taxes and ecological sustainability: Evidence from top‐seven green economies by novel quantile approaches," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 825-839, April.
    12. Bartosz Jóźwik & Sevgi Sümerli Sarıgül & Betül Altay Topcu & Murat Çetin & Mesut Doğan, 2025. "Trade Openness, Economic Growth, Capital, and Financial Globalization: Unveiling Their Impact on Renewable Energy Consumption," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-19, March.
    13. Filiou, Despoina & Kesidou, Effie & Wu, Lichao, 2023. "Are smart cities green? The role of environmental and digital policies for Eco-innovation in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    14. Zhang, Mei & Zhang, Danting & Yang, Yunjiao, 2023. "Green bond and trade openness effects on sustainable business practices in natural resource markets," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    15. Yadav, Mikesh Prasad & Pandey, Asheesh & Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad & Arya, Vandana & Mishra, Nandita, 2023. "Volatility spillover of green bond with renewable energy and crypto market," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 928-939.
    16. Lai, Yu-Bong & Hu, Chia-Hsien, 2008. "Trade agreements, domestic environmental regulation, and transboundary pollution," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 209-228, May.
    17. Yao, Shun & Li, Tongxin & Li, Ying, 2023. "Promoting sustainable fossil fuels resources in BRICS countries: Evaluating green policies and driving renewable energy development," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    18. Koji Shimomura, 1997. "Factor Income Function and Oligopolistic Heckscher-Ohlin Model in Internationl Trade," Discussion Paper Series 82, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University, revised Jan 1998.
    19. Dutta, Prajit K. & Radner, Roy, 2025. "Climate payments: A Coase theorem," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    20. Ullah, Sami & Luo, Rundong & Nadeem, Muhammad & Cifuentes-Faura, Javier, 2023. "Advancing sustainable growth and energy transition in the United States through the lens of green energy innovations, natural resources and environmental policy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    21. André, F.J. & Ranocchia, C. & Rubio, S.J., 2025. "Porter Hypothesis vs. Pollution Haven Hypothesis: Can an environmental policy generate a win–win solution?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    22. Huang, Feipeng, 2023. "How does trade and fiscal decentralization leads to green growth; role of renewable energy development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 334-341.
    23. Tao Ge & Yuan Chen, 2025. "Interregional Environmental Policy Coordination, Natural Resource Endowment, and Green Economic Development: A Quantitative Analysis of China’s Policy Tests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, January.
    24. Cui, Kai & Li, Xinxue & Li, Gang, 2023. "What kind of fiscal policies and natural resources efficiency promotes green economic growth? Evidence from regression analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    25. De Miguel, Carlos & Montero, María & Bajona, Claustre, 2015. "Intergenerational effects of a green tax reform for a more sustainable social security system," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(S1), pages 117-129.
    26. Yang, Yi & Zhen, Deyun & Meng, Fuyu, 2024. "Mineral resource management for a sustainable future: Unraveling the role of energy tax in driving green technologies and environmental quality," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    27. Felbermayr, Gabriel & Peterson, Sonja & Wanner, Joschka, 2025. "Trade and the environment, trade policies and environmental policies—How do they interact?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 323983, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    28. Dai, Jiapeng & Ahmed, Zahoor & Sinha, Avik & Pata, Ugur Korkut & Alvarado, Rafael, 2023. "Sustainable green electricity, technological innovation, and ecological footprint: Does democratic accountability moderate the nexus?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    29. Shimomura, Koji, 1998. "Factor income function and an oligopolistic Heckscher-Ohlin model of international trade," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 91-100, October.
    30. Yang, Hao-Yen, 2001. "Carbon emissions control and trade liberalization: coordinated approaches to Taiwan's trade and tax policy," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 725-734, July.
    31. Ge, Tao & Li, Chunying & Li, Jinye & Hao, Xionglei, 2023. "Does neighboring green development benefit or suffer from local economic growth targets? Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Ge & Yuan Chen, 2025. "Interregional Environmental Policy Coordination, Natural Resource Endowment, and Green Economic Development: A Quantitative Analysis of China’s Policy Tests," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Mustafa Naimoğlu & Serkan Şahin & Sefa Özbek, 2025. "Governance, Corruption, Trade Openness, and Innovation: Key Drivers of Green Growth and Sustainable Development in Türkiye," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 4147-4162, June.
    3. Ly, Alpha, 2025. "Scaling up renewables without phasing down fossil fuels? Rethinking the role of financial globalization," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Liobikienė, Genovaitė & Butkus, Mindaugas, 2017. "Environmental Kuznets Curve of greenhouse gas emissions including technological progress and substitution effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 237-248.
    5. Mansor H. Ibrahim & Siong Hook Law, 2016. "Institutional Quality and CO 2 Emission–Trade Relations: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 84(2), pages 323-340, June.
    6. Kenji Fujiwara & Koji Shimomura, 2005. "A factor endowment theory of international trade under imperfect competition and increasing returns," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 38(1), pages 273-289, February.
    7. Barra, Cristian & Zotti, Roberto, 2016. "Investigating the impact of national income on environmental pollution. International evidence," MPRA Paper 74149, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Ai, Hongshan & Zhou, Zhengqing, 2023. "Green growth: The impact of urban forest construction on economic growth in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    9. Marbuah, George & Gren, Ing-Marie & Tirkaso, Wondmagegn Tafesse, 2021. "Social capital, economic development and carbon emissions: Empirical evidence from counties in Sweden," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Liu, Yiming & Hao, Yu & Gao, Yixuan, 2017. "The environmental consequences of domestic and foreign investment: Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 271-280.
    11. Lv, Zhike & Jiang, Fei & Xu, Ting, 2022. "Female parliamentarians and environment nexus: The neglected role of governance quality," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    12. Jingjing Qi, 2024. "Greening economic sectors through trade liberalization and efficient governance," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-8, December.
    13. Liu, Yin & Alnafrah, Ibrahim & Zhou, Yaying, 2024. "A systemic efficiency measurement of resource management and sustainable practices: A network bias-corrected DEA assessment of OECD countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    14. Kenji Fujiwara, 2005. "Unilateral and Multilateral Gains from Trade in International Oligopoly," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(255), pages 404-413, December.
    15. Yu, Yuyuan & Qayyum, Muhammad & Li, Shijie, 2024. "Trade dynamics of environmental goods within global energy economy and their impacts on green technological innovation: A complex network analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    16. Le Ngoc, Anh & Heshmati, Almas, 2025. "The Green Path: FDI’s Influence on Asia’s Sustainable Economic Growth," IZA Discussion Papers 17900, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. George Marbuah & Ing-Marie Gren, 2015. "Carbon Emissions and Social Capital in Sweden," Working Papers 2015.14, FAERE - French Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.
    18. Liu, Bing & Zhang, Xiangmeng, 2024. "The impact of ESG and executive structure on the default risk of family businesses: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    19. Octavio Fernández-Amador & Doris A. Oberdabernig & Patrick Tomberger, 2019. "Testing for Convergence in Carbon Dioxide Emissions Using a Bayesian Robust Structural Model," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(4), pages 1265-1286, August.
    20. Nguyen Phuc Canh & Su Dinh Thanh & Christophe Schinckus & Jo Bensemann & Lai Trung Thanh, 2019. "Global Emissions: A New Contribution from the Shadow Economy," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(3), pages 320-337.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9378-:d:1777076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.