IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9055-d1769918.html

Non-Food Geographical Indications in the European Union: Comparative Indicators, Cluster Typologies, and Policy Scenarios Under Regulation (EU) 2023/2411

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Peira

    (Department of Management, University of Turin, 10134 Torino, Italy)

  • Sergio Arnoldi

    (Chamber of Commerce of Turin, 10123 Torino, Italy)

  • Alessandro Bonadonna

    (Department of Management, University of Turin, 10134 Torino, Italy)

Abstract

Non-food geographical indications (GIs) are emerging as strategic policy instruments in the European Union after Regulation (EU) 2023/2411 extended protection to craft and industrial products. While the literature on agri-food GIs is extensive, empirical and comparative evidence on non-food GIs remains scarce and fragmented. This study addresses this gap by constructing a harmonised dataset, combining 132 registered and 380 potential non-food GIs identified by EUIPO (512 in total across the EU). Using secondary institutional data, descriptive and comparative statistics, and a hierarchical clustering (Ward, squared Euclidean distance) on normalised indicators total GIs, GIs per million inhabitants (GI/POP), and GIs per € billion of GDP (GI/GDP), the analysis identifies three country typologies differing by scale and intensity. Results reveal a strong geographical concentration in Southern Europe but also unexpectedly high intensity in smaller or mid-sized economies such as Portugal, Cyprus, and Slovenia. A forward-looking scenario analysis based on Cost of Non-Europe (CoNE) estimates suggests that the full implementation of the new Regulation could generate 284,000–338,000 new jobs and € 37–50 billion in additional intra-EU trade. The study contributes to EU policy debates by introducing comparative indicators (GI/POP, GI/GDP) as monitoring tools for evidence-based policymaking and by highlighting the role of non-food GIs as hybrid institutions connecting industrial competitiveness, cultural identity, and sustainability transitions.

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Peira & Sergio Arnoldi & Alessandro Bonadonna, 2025. "Non-Food Geographical Indications in the European Union: Comparative Indicators, Cluster Typologies, and Policy Scenarios Under Regulation (EU) 2023/2411," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-25, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9055-:d:1769918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9055/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9055/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mazzucato, Mariana & Semieniuk, Gregor, 2018. "Financing renewable energy: Who is financing what and why it matters," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 8-22.
    2. Becker, Tilman C., 2009. "European Food Quality Policy: The Importance of Geographical Indications, Organic Certification and Food Quality Assurance Schemes in European Countries," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 10(01), pages 1-20.
    3. Daniel Pick, 2008. "Geographical Indications and the Competitive Provision of Quality in Agricultural Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 90(3), pages 794-812.
    4. Philip McCann & Raquel Ortega-Argil�s, 2015. "Smart Specialization, Regional Growth and Applications to European Union Cohesion Policy," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1291-1302, August.
    5. Belletti, Giovanni & Marescotti, Andrea & Touzard, Jean-Marc, 2017. "Geographical Indications, Public Goods, and Sustainable Development: The Roles of Actors’ Strategies and Public Policies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 45-57.
    6. Emilie Vandecandelaere & Luis Fernando Samper & Andrés Rey & Ana Daza & Pablo Mejía & Florence Tartanac & Massimo Vittori, 2021. "The Geographical Indication Pathway to Sustainability: A Framework to Assess and Monitor the Contributions of Geographical Indications to Sustainability through a Participatory Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    8. Dorota Leszczyńska & Nada Khachlouf, 2018. "How proximity matters in interactive learning and innovation: a study of the Venetian glass industry," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(9), pages 874-896, October.
    9. Christos N. Pitelis & David J. Teece, 2010. "Cross-border market co-creation, dynamic capabilities and the entrepreneurial theory of the multinational enterprise," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 19(4), pages 1247-1270, August.
    10. repec:bla:devpol:v:27:y:2009:i:5:p:503-528 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Dorota Leszczyńska & Nada Khachlouf, 2018. "How proximity matters in interactive learning and innovation: a study of the Venetian glass industry," Post-Print halshs-01824538, HAL.
    12. Valentina Raimondi & Chiara Falco & Daniele Curzi & Alessandro Olper, 2020. "Trade effects of geographical indication policy: The EU case," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 330-356, June.
    13. Maria Cecilia Mancini & Marianna Guareschi & Valentin Bellassen & Filippo Arfini, 2022. "Geographical Indications and Public Good Relationships: Evidence and Policy Implications," Post-Print hal-03813338, HAL.
    14. Kirchherr, Julian & Reike, Denise & Hekkert, Marko, 2017. "Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 221-232.
    15. Markard, Jochen & Raven, Rob & Truffer, Bernhard, 2012. "Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 955-967.
    16. Maria Cecilia Mancini & Marianna Guareschi & Valentin Bellassen & Filippo Arfini, 2022. "Geographical Indications and Public Good Relationships: Evidence and Policy Implications," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(2), pages 66-71, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marcello De Rosa & Margherita Masi & Ludovica Apostolico & Luca Bartoli & Martina Francescone, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Risks of Unsustainability Linked to “Disaffection Effects” in the Dairy Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Zhuang Zhang & Qiuxia Yan & Hao Zheng & Mengqing Zeng & Youhua Chen, 2024. "Little Brands, Big Profits? Effect of Agricultural Geographical Indicators on County-Level Economic Development in China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    4. Regolo, Julie & Gendre, Cédric & Poméon, Thomas, 2025. "Does the geographical indications protection policy encourage more sustainable agriculture in the territories? Moving from claims to empirical evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    5. Zuzana Palková & Marieta Okenková & Marta Harničárová & Jan Valíček & Miroslav Gombár & Jakub Dvorský & Mária Behanovská & Monika Slaninová & Monika Reiskupová & Peter Vnučko, 2021. "Implementation of the EU Quality Policy: Case Study, Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-25, June.
    6. Julie Regolo & Cédric Gendre & Thomas Poméon, 2025. "Does the geographical indications protection policy encourage more sustainable agriculture in the territories? Moving from claims to empirical evidence," Post-Print hal-05234723, HAL.
    7. Zhang, Ruixue & Tang, Yuyan & Li, Yongli & Zhang, Yuanxin, 2025. "What motivates the collaborative innovation relationship in infrastructure projects from dynamic network perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    8. Susana López‐Bayón & Marta Fernández‐Barcala & Manuel González‐Díaz, 2020. "In search of agri‐food quality for wine: Is it enough to join a geographical indication?," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 568-590, October.
    9. Weiwen Qian & Yinguo Dong & Yuchen Liu, 2023. "The impact of mutual recognition of geographical indications on the quality upgrading of China’s agricultural exports," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Alejandro Aristi Capetillo & Fredric Bauer & Cristina Chaminade, 2023. "Emerging Technologies Supporting the Transition to a Circular Economy in the Plastic Materials Value Chain," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 953-982, June.
    11. Haiou Mao & Holger Görg, 2025. "Don't take me for a free‐ride: Chinese Agricultural Geographical Indications and firms' export quality," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 56(2), pages 188-209, March.
    12. Mara Giua & Luca Salvatici & Cristina Vaquero-Piñeiro & Roberto Solazzo, 2025. "Do Territories with Geographical Indications Trade Better?," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 11(1), pages 31-64, March.
    13. Huysmans, Martijn, 2021. "On Feta and Fetta: Protecting EU Geographical Indications Down Under," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314978, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Steffen, Bjarne & Karplus, Valerie & Schmidt, Tobias S., 2022. "State ownership and technology adoption: The case of electric utilities and renewable energy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(6).
    15. Stranieri, Stefanella & Orsi, Luigi & De Noni, Ivan & Olper, Alessandro, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Innovation: Evidence from EU regions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    16. Salman Shahzad & Baomin Wang, 2025. "Geographical Indications and Sustainable Development: Bridging Policy Gaps in Pakistan’s GI Framework for Socio-Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Maria Lisa Clodoveo & Ahmed Yangui & Mahdi Fendri & Simona Giordano & Pasquale Crupi & Filomena Corbo, 2021. "Protected Geographical Indications for EVOO in Tunisia: Towards Environmental, Social, and Economic Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-29, October.
    18. Liwen Sun & Ying Han, 2022. "Spatial Correlation Network Structure and Influencing Factors of Two-Stage Green Innovation Efficiency: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-22, September.
    19. Daniel Holzer & Claudia Mair-Bauernfeind & Michael Kriechbaum & Romana Rauter & Tobias Stern, 2023. "Different but the Same? Comparing Drivers and Barriers for Circular Economy Innovation Systems in Wood- and Plastic-Based Industries," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 983-1011, June.
    20. Biancolillo Ilaria & Paletto Alessandro & Bersier Jacques & Keller Michael & Romagnoli Manuela, 2020. "A literature review on forest bioeconomy with a bibliometric network analysis," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(7), pages 265-279.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9055-:d:1769918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.