IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cii/cepidt/2024-05.html

Protection of Geographical Indications in Trade Agreements: Is it worth it?

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Emlinger
  • Karine Latouche

Abstract

This paper estimates the impact of the inclusion of GIs in bilateral agreements on French exports of foodstuffs. We rely on a unique dataset of firms and products concerned by Geographical Indications (GIs) in the French agri-food industry (excluding wine) for 2012-2019, merged with firm-product-destination level data from French Customs and the French National Institute of Statistics. Controlling for market and firm characteristics, we compare the exports of GI firms with those of non-GI firms before and after the signing of the 13 agreements (25 destination countries) that include a list of GIs to be protected. We show that the protection of GIs in EU RTA helps French firms to reach new markets and to sell their products at higher price, but it depends on the level of protection provided by the agreement.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Emlinger & Karine Latouche, 2024. "Protection of Geographical Indications in Trade Agreements: Is it worth it?," Working Papers 2024-05, CEPII research center.
    • Handle: RePEc:cii:cepidt:2024-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2024/wp2024-05.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Le Roy, Cecile & Harel, Monique & Latouche, Karine & Gaigne, Carl & Turolla, Stephane, 2014. "Nomenclature de produits et concordance dans le temps. Procédure de correction et analyses de sensibilité," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 343(September).
    2. Daniele Curzi & Martijn Huysmans, 2022. "The Impact of Protecting EU Geographical Indications in Trade Agreements," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(1), pages 364-384, January.
    3. Valentina Raimondi & Chiara Falco & Daniele Curzi & Alessandro Olper, 2020. "Trade effects of geographical indication policy: The EU case," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 330-356, June.
    4. Zakaria Sorgho & Bruno Larue, 2014. "Geographical indication regulation and intra-trade in the European Union," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(S1), pages 1-12, November.
    5. Baker, Andrew C. & Larcker, David F. & Wang, Charles C.Y., 2022. "How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(2), pages 370-395.
    6. Martijn Huysmans, 2022. "On Feta and Fetta: Protecting EU geographical indications in Australia," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 73(2), pages 598-613, June.
    7. Luisa Menapace & Gian Carlo Moschini, 2014. "Strength of Protection for Geographical Indications: Promotion Incentives and Welfare Effects," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 96(4), pages 1030-1048.
    8. Tim Josling, 2006. "The War on Terroir: Geographical Indications as a Transatlantic Trade Conflict," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 337-363, September.
    9. Martijn Huysmans & Johan Swinnen, 2019. "No Terroir in the Cold? A Note on the Geography of Geographical Indications," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(2), pages 550-559, June.
    10. Amit Khandelwal, 2010. "The Long and Short (of) Quality Ladders," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 77(4), pages 1450-1476.
    11. De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    12. Sorgho, Zakaria & Larue, Bruno, 2014. "Geographical Indication Regulation and Intra-Trade in the European Union," Working Papers 162246, University of Laval, Center for Research on the Economics of the Environment, Agri-food, Transports and Energy (CREATE).
    13. Martijn Huysmans, 2022. "Exporting protection: EU trade agreements, geographical indications, and gastronationalism," Review of International Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 979-1005, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mara Giua & Luca Salvatici & Cristina Vaquero-Piñeiro & Roberto Solazzo, 2025. "Do Territories with Geographical Indications Trade Better?," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 11(1), pages 31-64, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Martijn Huysmans & D. van Noord, 2021. "The market for lemons from Sorrento and Gouda from Holland. Do geographical indications certify origin and quality?: Do geographical indications certify origin and quality?," Working Papers 2108, Utrecht School of Economics.
    3. Daniele Curzi & Martijn Huysmans & Oliver Ken Haase, 2023. "Potable Intellectual Property: WTO TRIPS and EU Geographical Indication Wines," Working Papers 2311, Utrecht School of Economics.
    4. Huysmans, Martijn, 2021. "On Feta and Fetta: Protecting EU Geographical Indications Down Under," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 314978, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Weiwen Qian & Yinguo Dong & Yuchen Liu, 2025. "Mutual recognition of geographical indications and China's agricultural exports—On the use of domestic and international markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(2), pages 445-480, April.
    6. David Moroz, 2024. "What does terroir mean? A science mapping of a multidimensional concept," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 889-913, September.
    7. Weiwen Qian & Yinguo Dong, 2023. "Comparative study on the geographical indication protection between China and the European Union - From the perspective of the China-EU Geographical Indications Agreement," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(5), pages 185-201.
    8. Duvaleix, Sabine & Emlinger, Charlotte & Gaigné, Carl & Latouche, Karine, 2021. "Geographical indications and trade: Firm-level evidence from the French cheese industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    9. Filippis, Fabrizio De & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Pineiro, Cristina, 2021. "The International Competitiveness of Geographical Indications: Hype or Hope?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315147, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Annalisa Zezza & Federica Demaria & Maria Rosaria Pupo d'Andrea & Jo Swinnen & Giulia Meloni & Senne Vandevelde & Alessandro Olper & Daniele Curzi & Valentina Raimondi & Sophie Drogue, 2018. "Research for AGRI Committee - Agricultural trade: assessing reciprocity of standards," Working Papers hal-02787948, HAL.
    11. David J. Kuenzel, 2023. "Geographical Protections and Trade: Product-level Evidence from EU Agreements," Wesleyan Economics Working Papers 2023-001, Wesleyan University, Department of Economics.
    12. Daniele Curzi & Martijn Huysmans & Oliver Ken Haase, 2024. "Potable intellectual property: WTO TRIPS and EU geographical indication wines," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(3), pages 1065-1082, September.
    13. Johan Swinnen & Alessandro Olper & Senne Vandevelde, 2021. "From unfair prices to unfair trading practices: Political economy, value chains and 21st century agri‐food policy," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 771-788, September.
    14. Mara Giua & Luca Salvatici & Cristina Vaquero-Piñeiro & Roberto Solazzo, 2025. "Do Territories with Geographical Indications Trade Better?," Italian Economic Journal: A Continuation of Rivista Italiana degli Economisti and Giornale degli Economisti, Springer;Società Italiana degli Economisti (Italian Economic Association), vol. 11(1), pages 31-64, March.
    15. Crescenzi, Riccardo & De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero Pineiro, Cristina, 2023. "From local to global, and return: geographical Indications and FDI in Europe," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 120408, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Stranieri, Stefanella & Orsi, Luigi & De Noni, Ivan & Olper, Alessandro, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Innovation: Evidence from EU regions," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    17. Cei, Leonardo & Stefani, Gianluca & Defrancesco, Edi, 2021. "How do local factors shape the regional adoption of geographical indications in Europe? Evidences from France, Italy and Spain," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    18. Valentina Raimondi & Chiara Falco & Daniele Curzi & Alessandro Olper, 2020. "Trade effects of geographical indication policy: The EU case," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(2), pages 330-356, June.
    19. Guanghao Wu, 2024. "From Soil to Soul: Agro-Product Geographical Indications and the Subjective Well-Being of Rural Residents," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 1-25, August.
    20. Cristina Vaquero Piñeiro & Daniele Curzi, 2024. "Assessing the role of geographical indications in affecting the quality of imports," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 653-671, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F10 - International Economics - - Trade - - - General
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cii:cepidt:2024-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepiifr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.