IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5114-d1670566.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geographical Indications and Sustainable Development: Bridging Policy Gaps in Pakistan’s GI Framework for Socio-Economic Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Salman Shahzad

    (School of Law, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Baomin Wang

    (School of Law, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

Abstract

Pakistan, a country with a rich cultural heritage and diverse products, enacted the Geographical Indications (Registration and Protection) Act 2020 to comply with the WTO’s TRIPS Agreement, which defines GIs as signs linking products to their geographic origin based on unique qualities or reputation. This legal framework aims to protect local products, promote exports, and drive economic growth. To date, Pakistan has 10 registered and 65 notified GIs. This study critically examines Pakistan’s GI framework, highlighting gaps in legislation, enforcement, institutional capacity, and stakeholder awareness. It assesses Pakistan’s alignment with international standards (e.g., the EU model) and explores how GIs can foster sustainable rural development, cultural preservation, and economic growth. As a governance tool, GIs ensure equitable benefit-sharing, enhance market competitiveness, and promote eco-friendly traditional practices. The findings reveal that addressing policy weaknesses and strengthening institutional mechanisms could unlock the full socio-economic potential of GIs, contributing to sustainable industrialization and rural uplift. Aligning Pakistan’s GI framework with global best practices would not only protect indigenous products but also boost their international recognition, reduce poverty, and advance sustainable development goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Salman Shahzad & Baomin Wang, 2025. "Geographical Indications and Sustainable Development: Bridging Policy Gaps in Pakistan’s GI Framework for Socio-Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5114-:d:1670566
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5114/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5114/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gangjee,Dev, 2012. "Relocating the Law of Geographical Indications," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521192026, November.
    2. Áron Török & Lili Jantyik & Zalán Márk Maró & Hazel V. J. Moir, 2020. "Understanding the Real-World Impact of Geographical Indications: A Critical Review of the Empirical Economic Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Lingling Li & Yingzi Chen & Haoran Gao & Changjian Li, 2023. "How to Regulate the Infringements of Geographical Indications of Agricultural Products—An Empirical Study on Judicial Documents in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-31, March.
    4. Emilie Vandecandelaere & Luis Fernando Samper & Andrés Rey & Ana Daza & Pablo Mejía & Florence Tartanac & Massimo Vittori, 2021. "The Geographical Indication Pathway to Sustainability: A Framework to Assess and Monitor the Contributions of Geographical Indications to Sustainability through a Participatory Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    5. De Filippis, Fabrizio & Giua, Mara & Salvatici, Luca & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    6. Yongzhong Yang & Mohsin Shafi & Xiaoting Song & Ruo Yang, 2018. "Preservation of Cultural Heritage Embodied in Traditional Crafts in the Developing Countries. A Case Study of Pakistani Handicraft Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Julie Regolo & Cédric Gendre & Thomas Poméon, 2025. "Does the geographical indications protection policy encourage more sustainable agriculture in the territories? Moving from claims to empirical evidence," Post-Print hal-05234723, HAL.
    3. Giovanni Peira & Sergio Arnoldi & Alessandro Bonadonna, 2025. "Non-Food Geographical Indications in the European Union: Comparative Indicators, Cluster Typologies, and Policy Scenarios Under Regulation (EU) 2023/2411," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Emlinger, Charlotte & Latouche, Karine, 2022. "Protection of Geographical Indications in Trade Agreements: is it worth it?," 2022: Transforming Global Value Chains, December 11-13, Clearwater Beach, FL 339444, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    5. Marcello De Rosa & Margherita Masi & Ludovica Apostolico & Luca Bartoli & Martina Francescone, 2023. "Geographical Indications and Risks of Unsustainability Linked to “Disaffection Effects” in the Dairy Sector," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, January.
    6. Benzarour, Choukri, 2022. "التدخل لتحسين أدوار ونتائج قطاع الحرف اليدوية في الجزائر: التطلع إلى المستقبل، وتحديد عناصر الممارسة الفعالة [Intervening to improve roles and outcomes of Algerian handicraft sector: Looking to the," MPRA Paper 112833, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Karola Schober & Richard Balling & Tobias Chilla & Hannah Lindermayer, 2023. "European Integration Processes in the EU GI System—A Long-Term Review of EU Regulation for GIs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, February.
    8. Wojciech Połeć & Daria Murawska, 2021. "The Social Constraints on the Preservation and Sustainable Development of Traditional Crafts in a Developed Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, December.
    9. Maminiaina Randrianandrasana & Stéphane Fournier & Mikael Linder, 2024. "GIs, a promising innovation for the development of Africa’s food systems? The decisive role of collective actions," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, December.
    10. Nan Yang & Xiaoge Zang & Cong Chen, 2022. "Inheritance Patterns under Cultural Ecology Theory for the Sustainable Development of Traditional Handicrafts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Lingling Li & Yingzi Chen & Haoran Gao & Changjian Li, 2023. "How to Regulate the Infringements of Geographical Indications of Agricultural Products—An Empirical Study on Judicial Documents in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-31, March.
    12. Bach Q. Ho, 2024. "Customers’ Prior Knowledge in the Servitization of Traditional Handicrafts," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-11, February.
    13. Le Goffic, Caroline & Zappalaglio, Andrea, 2017. "The Role Played by the US Government in Protecting Geographical Indications," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 35-44.
    14. Guanghao Wu, 2024. "From Soil to Soul: Agro-Product Geographical Indications and the Subjective Well-Being of Rural Residents," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(6), pages 1-25, August.
    15. Barjolle, Dominique & Quiñones-Ruiz, Xiomara F. & Bagal, Monique & Comoé, Hermann, 2017. "The Role of the State for Geographical Indications of Coffee: Case Studies from Colombia and Kenya," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 105-119.
    16. Matthew J. Zinsli, 2023. "Authorizing the ‘taste of place’ for Galápagos Islands coffee: scientific knowledge, development politics, and power in geographical indication implementation," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 40(2), pages 581-597, June.
    17. Wenyu Lv & Di Dai & Renjie Wei & Lanlan Bai, 2023. "Restoration of the Nanjing Circumvallation in Sustainable Urban Planning: Application of Environmental Ethical Decision-Making Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    18. Meyer, Camille & Naicker, Kiruben, 2023. "Collective intellectual property of Indigenous peoples and local communities: Exploring power asymmetries in the rooibos geographical indication and industry-wide benefit-sharing agreement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
    19. Fulin Liu & Shixin Ding & Jinxing Zhang & Yingying Wang, 2024. "A multiscale and multiperspective quantifying framework for spatial patterns and influencing mechanisms of geographical indications," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-12, December.
    20. Chunyan Li & Lanqing Ge & Qi Ban & Xiaoting Song, 2025. "Protection of geographical indication products and sustainable agricultural development: The role of public policies," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(2), pages 59-70.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5114-:d:1670566. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.