IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7400-d1725531.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolutionary Game Theory in Energy Storage Systems: A Systematic Review of Collaborative Decision-Making, Operational Strategies, and Coordination Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Kun Wang

    (Institute for Human Rights, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Lefeng Cheng

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Meng Yin

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Kuozhen Zhang

    (Law School, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China)

  • Ruikun Wang

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Mengya Zhang

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Runbao Sun

    (School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

As global energy systems transition towards greater reliance on renewable energy sources, the integration of energy storage systems (ESSs) becomes increasingly critical to managing the intermittency and variability associated with renewable generation. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the application of evolutionary game theory (EGT) to optimize ESSs, emphasizing its role in enhancing decision-making processes, operation scheduling, and multi-agent coordination within dynamic, decentralized energy environments. A significant contribution of this paper is the incorporation of negotiation mechanisms and collaborative decision-making frameworks, which are essential for effective multi-agent coordination in complex systems. Unlike traditional game-theoretic models, EGT accounts for bounded rationality and strategic adaptation, offering a robust tool for modeling the interactions among stakeholders such as energy producers, consumers, and storage operators. The paper first addresses the key challenges in integrating ESS into modern power grids, particularly with high penetration of intermittent renewable energy. It then introduces the foundational principles of EGT and compares its advantages over classical game theory in capturing the evolving strategies of agents within these complex environments. A key innovation explored in this review is the hybridization of game-theoretic models, combining the stability of classical game theory with the adaptability of EGT, providing a comprehensive approach to resource allocation and coordination. Furthermore, this paper highlights the importance of deliberative democracy and process-based negotiation decision-making mechanisms in optimizing ESS operations, proposing a shift towards more inclusive, transparent, and consensus-driven decision-making. The review also examines several case studies where EGT has been successfully applied to optimize both local and large-scale ESSs, demonstrating its potential to enhance system efficiency, reduce operational costs, and improve reliability. Additionally, hybrid models incorporating evolutionary algorithms and particle swarm optimization have shown superior performance compared to traditional methods. The future directions for EGT in ESS optimization are discussed, emphasizing the integration of artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and blockchain technologies to address current challenges such as data scarcity, computational complexity, and scalability. These interdisciplinary innovations are expected to drive the development of more resilient, efficient, and flexible energy systems capable of supporting a decarbonized energy future.

Suggested Citation

  • Kun Wang & Lefeng Cheng & Meng Yin & Kuozhen Zhang & Ruikun Wang & Mengya Zhang & Runbao Sun, 2025. "Evolutionary Game Theory in Energy Storage Systems: A Systematic Review of Collaborative Decision-Making, Operational Strategies, and Coordination Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-153, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7400-:d:1725531
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7400/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7400/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fudenberg, Drew & Tirole, Jean, 1991. "Perfect Bayesian equilibrium and sequential equilibrium," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 236-260, April.
    2. John C. Harsanyi & Reinhard Selten, 1988. "A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262582384, December.
    3. Cheng, Lefeng & Yu, Feng & Huang, Pengrong & Liu, Guiyun & Zhang, Mengya & Sun, Runbao, 2025. "Game-theoretic evolution in renewable energy systems: Advancing sustainable energy management and decision optimization in decentralized power markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Yang, Yuqing & Bremner, Stephen & Menictas, Chris & Kay, Merlinde, 2022. "Modelling and optimal energy management for battery energy storage systems in renewable energy systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Roth, Alvin E. & Erev, Ido, 1995. "Learning in extensive-form games: Experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 8(1), pages 164-212.
    6. Borgers, Tilman & Sarin, Rajiv, 1997. "Learning Through Reinforcement and Replicator Dynamics," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui & Li, Ke & Ma, Xin, 2021. "Game theory-based multi-agent capacity optimization for integrated energy systems with compressed air energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    8. Kandori, Michihiro & Mailath, George J & Rob, Rafael, 1993. "Learning, Mutation, and Long Run Equilibria in Games," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 61(1), pages 29-56, January.
    9. Ken Binmore, 2007. "Rational Decisions in Large Worlds," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 86, pages 25-41.
    10. Lefeng Cheng & Pengrong Huang & Mengya Zhang & Ru Yang & Yafei Wang, 2025. "Optimizing Electricity Markets Through Game-Theoretical Methods: Strategic and Policy Implications for Power Purchasing and Generation Enterprises," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-90, January.
    11. Aneke, Mathew & Wang, Meihong, 2016. "Energy storage technologies and real life applications – A state of the art review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 350-377.
    12. Christos-Spyridon Karavas & Konstantinos Arvanitis & George Papadakis, 2017. "A Game Theory Approach to Multi-Agent Decentralized Energy Management of Autonomous Polygeneration Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Shuxia Yang & Xianguo Zhu & Shengjiang Peng, 2020. "Prospect Prediction of Terminal Clean Power Consumption in China via LSSVM Algorithm Based on Improved Evolutionary Game Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    14. Imed Khabbouchi & Dhaou Said & Aziz Oukaira & Idir Mellal & Lyes Khoukhi, 2023. "Machine Learning and Game-Theoretic Model for Advanced Wind Energy Management Protocol (AWEMP)," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-15, February.
    15. Erev, Ido & Roth, Alvin E, 1998. "Predicting How People Play Games: Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Games with Unique, Mixed Strategy Equilibria," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 88(4), pages 848-881, September.
    16. Kanase-Patil, A.B. & Saini, R.P. & Sharma, M.P., 2010. "Integrated renewable energy systems for off grid rural electrification of remote area," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1342-1349.
    17. Larry Samuelson, 2002. "Evolution and Game Theory," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 16(2), pages 47-66, Spring.
    18. Fei Huang & Hua Fan & Yunlong Shang & Yuankang Wei & Sulaiman Z. Almutairi & Abdullah M. Alharbi & Hengrui Ma & Hongxia Wang, 2024. "Research on Renewable Energy Trading Strategies Based on Evolutionary Game Theory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, March.
    19. Ibrahim, H. & Ilinca, A. & Perron, J., 2008. "Energy storage systems--Characteristics and comparisons," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 12(5), pages 1221-1250, June.
    20. Thomas, Gareth & Demski, Christina & Pidgeon, Nick, 2019. "Deliberating the social acceptability of energy storage in the UK," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    21. Kreps, David M., 1990. "Game Theory and Economic Modelling," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198283812.
    22. repec:adr:anecst:y:2007:i:86:p:04 is not listed on IDEAS
    23. Kebede, Abraham Alem & Kalogiannis, Theodoros & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Berecibar, Maitane, 2022. "A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    24. He, Ye & Wu, Hongbin & Wu, Andrew Y. & Li, Peng & Ding, Ming, 2024. "Optimized shared energy storage in a peer-to-peer energy trading market: Two-stage strategic model regards bargaining and evolutionary game theory," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    25. Mailath, George J. & Samuelson, Larry, 2006. "Repeated Games and Reputations: Long-Run Relationships," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195300796.
    26. Lefeng Cheng & Xin Wei & Manling Li & Can Tan & Meng Yin & Teng Shen & Tao Zou, 2024. "Integrating Evolutionary Game-Theoretical Methods and Deep Reinforcement Learning for Adaptive Strategy Optimization in User-Side Electricity Markets: A Comprehensive Review," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-56, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ianni, A., 2002. "Reinforcement learning and the power law of practice: some analytical results," Discussion Paper Series In Economics And Econometrics 203, Economics Division, School of Social Sciences, University of Southampton.
    2. Christoph Kuzmics & Daniel Rodenburger, 2020. "A case of evolutionarily stable attainable equilibrium in the laboratory," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 70(3), pages 685-721, October.
    3. Battalio,R. & Samuelson,L. & Huyck,J. van, 1998. "Risk dominance, payoff dominance and probabilistic choice learning," Working papers 2, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    4. Cabrales, Antonio & Garcia-Fontes, Walter & Motta, Massimo, 2000. "Risk dominance selects the leader: An experimental analysis," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 137-162, January.
    5. Kets, W., 2008. "Networks and learning in game theory," Other publications TiSEM 7713fce1-3131-498c-8c6f-3, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    6. Ponti, Giovanni, 2000. "Continuous-time evolutionary dynamics: theory and practice," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 187-214, June.
    7. Jonathan Newton, 2018. "Evolutionary Game Theory: A Renaissance," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-67, May.
    8. Guth, Werner & Pull, Kerstin, 2004. "Will equity evolve?: an indirect evolutionary approach," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 273-282, March.
    9. Tassos Patokos, 2014. "Introducing Disappointment Dynamics and Comparing Behaviors in Evolutionary Games: Some Simulation Results," Games, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, January.
    10. Mäs, Michael & Nax, Heinrich H., 2016. "A behavioral study of “noise” in coordination games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 195-208.
    11. repec:ehu:ikerla:9171 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. DeJong, D.V. & Blume, A. & Neumann, G., 1998. "Learning in Sender-Receiver Games," Other publications TiSEM 4a8b4f46-f30b-4ad2-bb0c-1, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. van Damme, E.E.C., 1995. "Game theory : The next stage," Other publications TiSEM 7779b0f9-bef5-45c7-ae6b-7, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    14. Norman, Thomas W.L., 2009. "Rapid evolution under inertia," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 865-879, July.
    15. Jean-François Laslier & Bernard Walliser, 2015. "Stubborn learning," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 79(1), pages 51-93, July.
    16. Boyu Zhang & Josef Hofbauer, 2015. "Equilibrium selection via replicator dynamics in $$2 \times 2$$ 2 × 2 coordination games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 44(2), pages 433-448, May.
    17. Hopkins, Ed, 1999. "Learning, Matching, and Aggregation," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 79-110, January.
    18. Funai, Naoki, 2022. "Reinforcement learning with foregone payoff information in normal form games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 638-660.
    19. Jiayang Li & Zhaoran Wang & Yu Marco Nie, 2023. "Wardrop Equilibrium Can Be Boundedly Rational: A New Behavioral Theory of Route Choice," Papers 2304.02500, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    20. Blume, Andreas & Gneezy, Uri, 2000. "An Experimental Investigation of Optimal Learning in Coordination Games," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 161-172, January.
    21. Kets, Willemien & Kager, Wouter & Sandroni, Alvaro, 2022. "The value of a coordination game," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7400-:d:1725531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.