Author
Listed:
- Kun Wang
(Institute for Human Rights, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Lefeng Cheng
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Meng Yin
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Kuozhen Zhang
(Law School, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China)
- Ruikun Wang
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Mengya Zhang
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
- Runbao Sun
(School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
Abstract
As global energy systems transition towards greater reliance on renewable energy sources, the integration of energy storage systems (ESSs) becomes increasingly critical to managing the intermittency and variability associated with renewable generation. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the application of evolutionary game theory (EGT) to optimize ESSs, emphasizing its role in enhancing decision-making processes, operation scheduling, and multi-agent coordination within dynamic, decentralized energy environments. A significant contribution of this paper is the incorporation of negotiation mechanisms and collaborative decision-making frameworks, which are essential for effective multi-agent coordination in complex systems. Unlike traditional game-theoretic models, EGT accounts for bounded rationality and strategic adaptation, offering a robust tool for modeling the interactions among stakeholders such as energy producers, consumers, and storage operators. The paper first addresses the key challenges in integrating ESS into modern power grids, particularly with high penetration of intermittent renewable energy. It then introduces the foundational principles of EGT and compares its advantages over classical game theory in capturing the evolving strategies of agents within these complex environments. A key innovation explored in this review is the hybridization of game-theoretic models, combining the stability of classical game theory with the adaptability of EGT, providing a comprehensive approach to resource allocation and coordination. Furthermore, this paper highlights the importance of deliberative democracy and process-based negotiation decision-making mechanisms in optimizing ESS operations, proposing a shift towards more inclusive, transparent, and consensus-driven decision-making. The review also examines several case studies where EGT has been successfully applied to optimize both local and large-scale ESSs, demonstrating its potential to enhance system efficiency, reduce operational costs, and improve reliability. Additionally, hybrid models incorporating evolutionary algorithms and particle swarm optimization have shown superior performance compared to traditional methods. The future directions for EGT in ESS optimization are discussed, emphasizing the integration of artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and blockchain technologies to address current challenges such as data scarcity, computational complexity, and scalability. These interdisciplinary innovations are expected to drive the development of more resilient, efficient, and flexible energy systems capable of supporting a decarbonized energy future.
Suggested Citation
Kun Wang & Lefeng Cheng & Meng Yin & Kuozhen Zhang & Ruikun Wang & Mengya Zhang & Runbao Sun, 2025.
"Evolutionary Game Theory in Energy Storage Systems: A Systematic Review of Collaborative Decision-Making, Operational Strategies, and Coordination Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Integration,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-153, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7400-:d:1725531
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7400-:d:1725531. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.