IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3872-d1388879.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumers’ Risk Perception of Triploid Food: Empirical Research Based on Variance Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Qi

    (College of Science, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Taoyang Cai

    (Aulin College, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Keyu Zhou

    (Aulin College, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Zhitao Hu

    (College of Economics and Management, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Fanjie Hao

    (College of Science, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Yutong Wei

    (College of Science, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Shangjie Ge-Zhang

    (College of Science, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Jingang Cui

    (College of Science, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

With the advancement of new food processing technology, triploid technology has emerged as a viable option to enhance plant yield and improve crop stress resistance. However, like many emerging technologies, food produced using triploid technology has sparked controversy regarding its safety since its inception. Particularly, consumers generally have a limited understanding of new technologies employed in food production, leading to concerns about potential risks and uncertainties associated with these technologies. Such concerns can significantly impact consumers’ acceptance and purchasing intentions toward foods modified using new technologies. This study collected 375 questionnaires from both online and offline sources and conducted a detailed analysis of consumers’ demographic variables, fear degree regarding triploid food, social trust, and concerns about food safety. SPSS and AMOS software were utilized for reliability and validity analysis, variance analysis, multiple comparisons, and confirmatory factor analysis. A structural equation model was developed to comprehensively examine consumers’ risk perception of triploid food and its influencing factors. The results indicate that consumers’ risk perception of triploid food is influenced by various factors. Notably, significant differences were found in consumers’ risk perception of triploid food based on age, educational background, residency, and employment status. Additionally, this study identified a negative correlation between consumers’ risk perception of triploid food and their levels of fear and social trust. Conversely, a positive correlation was observed between risk perception and the degree of attention given to food safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Qi & Taoyang Cai & Keyu Zhou & Zhitao Hu & Fanjie Hao & Yutong Wei & Shangjie Ge-Zhang & Jingang Cui, 2024. "Consumers’ Risk Perception of Triploid Food: Empirical Research Based on Variance Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3872-:d:1388879
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3872/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3872/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guanghua Han & Simin Yan, 2019. "Does Food Safety Risk Perception Affect the Public’s Trust in Their Government? An Empirical Study on a National Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Xiling WANG & Zong-Ming CHENG & Shuang ZHI & Fengxiang XU, 2016. "Breeding triploid plants: a review," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 52(2), pages 41-54.
    3. Rodolfo M. Nayga, 1996. "Sociodemographic Influences on Consumer Concern for Food Safety: The Case of Irradiation, Antibiotics, Hormones, and Pesticides," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 18(3), pages 467-475.
    4. Donna M. Dosman & Wiktor L. Adamowicz & Steve E. Hrudey, 2001. "Socioeconomic Determinants of Health‐ and Food Safety‐Related Risk Perceptions," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(2), pages 307-318, April.
    5. Michael Siegrist, 2003. "Perception of gene technology, and food risks: results of a survey in Switzerland," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 45-60, January.
    6. Thanh Mai Ha & Shamim Shakur & Kim Hang Pham Do, 2019. "Consumers’ Perception of Food Safety Risk From Vegetables: A Rural - Urban Comparison," Discussion Papers 1902, School of Economics and Finance, Massey University, New Zealand.
    7. Lin, Chung-Tung Jordan, 1995. "Demographic And Socioeconomic Influences On The Importance Of Food Safety In Food Shopping," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-9, October.
    8. Guanghua Han & Yihong Liu, 2018. "Does Information Pattern Affect Risk Perception of Food Safety? A National Survey in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Lin, Chung-Tung Jordan, 1995. "Demographic and Socioeconomic Influences on the Importance of Food Safety in Food Shopping," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 190-198, October.
    10. Shangjie Ge-Zhang & Taoyang Cai & Zhitao Hu & Haotong Zhu & Pingxuan Mu & Jingang Cui, 2023. "Investigation and Suggestions regarding Residents’ Understanding of Waste Classification in Chinese Prefecture-Level Cities—A Case Study of Maanshan City, Anhui Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-8, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jae-Hwan Han & R. Wes Harrison, 2007. "Factors Influencing Urban Consumers' Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(4), pages 700-719.
    2. Baker, Gregory A., 2003. "Food Safety And Fear: Factors Affecting Consumer Response To Food Safety Risk," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11.
    3. Baker, Gregory A. & Burnham, Thomas A., 2001. "Consumer Response To Genetically Modified Foods: Market Segment Analysis And Implications For Producers And Policy Makers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Marcel Kornelis & Janneke De Jonge & Lynn Frewer & Hans Dagevos, 2007. "Consumer Selection of Food‐Safety Information Sources," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 327-335, April.
    5. Goss, Jody & Holcomb, Rodney B. & Ward, Clement E., 2002. "Factors Influencing Consumer Decisions Related To "Natural" Beef In The Southern Plains," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 33(1), pages 1-12, March.
    6. Han, Jae-Hwan & Harrison, R. Wes, 2006. "Consumer Valuation of the Second Generation of Genetically Modified (GM) Foods with Benefits Disclosure," 2006 Annual Meeting, February 5-8, 2006, Orlando, Florida 35277, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Rimal, Arbindra & Fletcher, Stanley M. & McWatters, Kay H., 2000. "Nutrition Considerations In Food Selection," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 3(1), pages 1-16.
    8. Chen, Lijun & Parcell, Joe L & Chen, Chao & James, Harvey S. Jr & Xu, Danning, 2016. "Consumer preference for supermarket food sampling in China," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236043, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Muhammad, Safdar & Sherif, Sherin & Gheblawi, Mohamed, 2010. "Consumers’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Food Safety in the United Arab Emirates," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 41(2), pages 1-13, July.
    10. Nayga, Rodolfo M., 1996. "Determinants of Consumers' Use of Nutritional Information on Food Packages," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(2), pages 303-312, December.
    11. Armah, Paul W. & Kennedy, Donald, 2000. "Evaluating Consumer Perceptions And Preferences For Pasture-Raised Pork In The Mississippi Delta Of Arkansas," Journal of Agribusiness, Agricultural Economics Association of Georgia, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13.
    12. Cerroni, Simone & Notaro, Sandra & Shaw, W. Douglass, 2013. "How many bad apples are in a bunch? An experimental investigation of perceived pesticide residue risks," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 112-123.
    13. Rimal, Arbindra & Fletcher, Stanley M., 2003. "Understanding Consumers' Attitude Toward Meat Labels And Meat Consumption Pattern," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35027, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    14. Armah, Paul W. & Kennedy, Donald, 2000. "Identification Of Market Potential For Pasture-Raised Pork In The Mississippi Delta Of Arkansas-1998," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 31(1), pages 1-9, March.
    15. Veeman, Michele M. & Adamowicz, Wiktor L., 2004. "Genetically Modified Foods: Consumers' Attitudes And Labeling Issues," Project Report Series 24060, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    16. Adu-Nyako, Kofi & Kunda, Danny & Ralston, Katherine L., 2003. "Safe Handling Labels And Consumer Behavior In The Southern Us," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21925, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Veeman, Michele M. & Adamowicz, Wiktor L., 2000. "Consumer'S Perceptions Of Environmental Risks And The Demand For Food Safety," Project Report Series 24040, University of Alberta, Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology.
    18. Heo, Seong-Yoon & Kim, Sanghyo & Zulauf, Carl & Lee, Kye-Im, 2016. "Satisfaction with Food Policies for Consumer: A Case Study of South Korea," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236145, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Straub, Matthew O. & Thomassin, Paul J., 2006. "Product Attributes and Consumer Willingness to Pay for Environmental Management Systems in Agriculture: Using the Choice Modeling Technique," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21051, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    20. Jolly, Curtis M. & Bayard, Budry & Awuah, Richard T. & Fialor, Simon C. & Williams, Johnathan T., 2009. "Examining the structure of awareness and perceptions of groundnut aflatoxin among Ghanaian health and agricultural professionals and its influence on their actions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 280-287, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3872-:d:1388879. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.