IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2989-d1369697.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Dairy Farm Welfare: A Holistic Examination of Technology Adoption and Economic Performance in Kahramanmaraş Province, Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Melih Erdem

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Selçuk University, Konya 42000, Türkiye)

  • Hasan Burak Ağır

    (Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Kahramanmaraş 46000, Türkiye)

Abstract

Technology and innovations have significant potential to enhance farm productivity, profitability, and economic sustainability. This study comprehensively investigates the relationship between technology adoption and economic performance within dairy farming. First, it seeks to clarify how socio-economic, information-seeking, behavioral factors and technical efficiency influence the level of technology adoption in dairy farms. It also compares the economic indicators of dairy farms depending on their technology adoption levels and evaluates whether technology adoption affects dairy farms’ technical, allocative, and economic efficiency. The data were collected from 188 dairy farmers in Kahramanmaraş Province in the East Mediterranean Region of Turkey in 2022. The results reveal that dairy farms’ technology adoption levels are influenced by income, household size, investment, ownership of cultured cattle breeds, Chamber of Agriculture membership, contact frequency with private veterinarians and other farmers, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and technical efficiency. Farms with high-level technology adoption demonstrate increased profitability and efficiency scores, highlighting the positive correlation between technology adoption and farm efficiency. Policymakers should focus on training and support programs for dairy farmers to optimize technology use and input management. They can also promote resource-efficient farming and provide financial incentives for sustainable practices and dairy technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Melih Erdem & Hasan Burak Ağır, 2024. "Enhancing Dairy Farm Welfare: A Holistic Examination of Technology Adoption and Economic Performance in Kahramanmaraş Province, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-22, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2989-:d:1369697
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2989/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2989/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Karina Gallardo & Johannes Sauer, 2018. "Adoption of Labor-Saving Technologies in Agriculture," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 185-206, October.
    2. Feder, Gershon & Just, Richard E & Zilberman, David, 1985. "Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 255-298, January.
    3. Shabir Ahmad Mir & T. Padma, 2020. "Integrated Technology Acceptance Model for the Evaluation of Agricultural Decision Support Systems," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(2), pages 138-164, April.
    4. Osman Doğan Bulut & Süleyman Karaman & Zeynep Çelik Kaysim & Ayşe Karadağ Gürsoy, 2023. "Factors Affecting Landowners’ Willingness to Sustain Hiring Foreign Farmworkers: The Case of Banana Producers in Mersin Province, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Jiang, Nan & Sharp, Basil, 2014. "Cost Efficiency of Dairy Farming in New Zealand: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 406-418, December.
    6. Hisham S. El-Osta & Mitchell J. Morehart, 2000. "Technology Adoption and Its Impact on Production Performance of Dairy Operations," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 477-498.
    7. Richard Williams, 2012. "Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects," Stata Journal, StataCorp LP, vol. 12(2), pages 308-331, June.
    8. João Augusto Rossi Borges & Alfons G.J.M. Oude Lansink & Grigorios Emvalomatis, 2019. "Adoption of innovation in agriculture: a critical review of economic and psychological models," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 36-56.
    9. Tom Kompas & Tuong Nhu Che, 2006. "Technology choice and efficiency on Australian dairy farms," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(1), pages 65-83, March.
    10. Flett, Ross & Alpass, Fiona & Humphries, Steve & Massey, Claire & Morriss, Stuart & Long, Nigel, 2004. "The technology acceptance model and use of technology in New Zealand dairy farming," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 199-211, May.
    11. A. Gelan & B.W. Muriithi, 2012. "Measuring and explaining technical efficiency of dairy farms: a case study of smallholder farms in East Africa," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(2), pages 53-74.
    12. Silva Emiliana & Almeida Bruno & Marta-Costa Ana Alexandra, 2018. "Efficiency of the Dairy Farms: A Study from Azores (Portugal)," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(4), pages 725-734, December.
    13. Fraser, I. & Cordina, D., 1999. "An application of data envelopment analysis to irrigated dairy farms in Northern Victoria, Australia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 267-282, March.
    14. Timothy J. Coelli & D.S. Prasada Rao & Christopher J. O’Donnell & George E. Battese, 2005. "An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-0-387-25895-9, April.
    15. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kamrath, Carolin & Rajendran, Srinivasulu & Nenguwo, Ngoni & Afari-Sefa, Victor & Broring, Stefanie, 2018. "Adoption behavior of market traders: an analysis based on Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    2. Anjani Kumar & Ashok K. Mishra & Sunil Saroj & Vinay K. Sonkar & Ganesh Thapa & Pramod K. Joshi, 2020. "Food safety measures and food security of smallholder dairy farmers: Empirical evidence from Bihar, India," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 363-384, June.
    3. Scheierling, Susanne M. & Treguer, David O. & Booker, James F. & Decker, Elisabeth, 2014. "How to assess agricultural water productivity ? looking for water in the agricultural productivity and efficiency literature," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6982, The World Bank.
    4. Bopp, Carlos & Jara-Rojas, Roberto & Bravo-Ureta, Boris & Engler, Alejandra, 2022. "Irrigation water use, shadow values and productivity: Evidence from stochastic production frontiers in vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    5. Wanglin Ma & Kathryn Bicknell & Alan Renwick, 2019. "Feed use intensification and technical efficiency of dairy farms in New Zealand," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 63(1), pages 20-38, January.
    6. Silva Emiliana & Almeida Bruno & Marta-Costa Ana Alexandra, 2018. "Efficiency of the Dairy Farms: A Study from Azores (Portugal)," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(4), pages 725-734, December.
    7. Kamiche Zegarra, J. & Bravo-Ureta, B., 2018. "Are users of market information efficient? A stochastic production frontier model corrected by sample selection," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275870, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Jiang, Nan & Sharp, Basil, 2014. "Cost Efficiency of Dairy Farming in New Zealand: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 43(3), pages 1-13, December.
    9. Gabriela Pérez Quesada, 2017. "Technical efficiency of dairy farms in Uruguay: a stochastic production frontier analysis," Documentos de Trabajo (working papers) 0517, Department of Economics - dECON.
    10. Osrof, Hazem Yusuf & Tan, Cheng Ling & Angappa, Gunasekaran & Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Kim Hua, 2023. "Adoption of smart farming technologies in field operations: A systematic review and future research agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Graham, Mary, 2008. "Biophysical Modelling and Performance Measurement," 2008 Conference (52nd), February 5-8, 2008, Canberra, Australia 6773, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    12. Veronika Hannus & Johannes Sauer, 2021. "Understanding Farmers’ Intention to Use a Sustainability Standard: The Role of Economic Rewards, Knowledge, and Ease of Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Ligia Alba Melo-Becerra & Antonio José Orozco-Gallo, 2017. "Technical efficiency for Colombian small crop and livestock farmers: A stochastic metafrontier approach for different production systems," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 1-16, February.
    14. Faruque-As-Sunny & Zuhui Huang & Taonarufaro Tinaye Pemberai Karimanzira, 2018. "Investigating Key Factors Influencing Farming Decisions Based on Soil Testing and Fertilizer Recommendation Facilities (STFRF)—A Case Study on Rural Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-24, November.
    15. Schaak, Henning & Musshoff, Oliver, 2017. "Behavioral Drivers for Grazing Practices in Dairy Farming," 2017 Conference (61st), February 7-10, 2017, Brisbane, Australia 258680, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    16. Scheierling, Susanne M. & Treguer, David O. & Booker, James F., 2015. "Water Productivity in Agriculture: Looking for Water in the Agricultural Productivity and Efficiency Literature," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205677, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Maroua Afi & Jay Parsons, 2023. "Integrated vs. Specialized Farming Systems for Sustainable Food Production: Comparative Analysis of Systems’ Technical Efficiency in Nebraska," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Bagheri, Asghar & Teymouri, Ali, 2022. "Farmers’ intended and actual adoption of soil and water conservation practices," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    19. Tzemi, Domna & Breen, James Patrick, 2019. "Socio-economic factors affecting the adoption of GHG emission abatement practices; the case of spring slurry spreading," International Journal of Agricultural Management, Institute of Agricultural Management, vol. 8(1), August.
    20. Thomas, Rosemary J. & O'Hare, Gregory & Coyle, David, 2023. "Understanding technology acceptance in smart agriculture: A systematic review of empirical research in crop production," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2989-:d:1369697. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.