IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2023i1p16-d1302904.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transformational and Transactional Leaders and Their Role in Implementing the Kotter Change Management Model Ensuring Sustainable Change: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Ali M. Mouazen

    (Management and International Management Department, Lebanese International University/International of Beirut, Beirut 14404, Lebanon)

  • Ana Beatriz Hernández-Lara

    (Department of Business Management, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Avinguda Universitat 1, 43204 Reus, Spain)

  • Farid Abdallah

    (College of Business, Australian University, Kuwait City 40255, Kuwait)

  • Muhieddine Ramadan

    (Management and International Management Department, Lebanese International University/International of Beirut, Beirut 14404, Lebanon)

  • Jawad Chahine

    (College of Business, Australian University, Kuwait City 40255, Kuwait)

  • Hala Baydoun

    (Management and International Management Department, Lebanese International University/International of Beirut, Beirut 14404, Lebanon)

  • Najib Bou Zakhem

    (Management and International Management Department, Lebanese International University/International of Beirut, Beirut 14404, Lebanon)

Abstract

A rapid pace of change presents an unforeseen and perpetual competitive challenge for organizations. Despite the existence of numerous change management models, organizational change leaders often encounter obstacles during the implementation phase that limit change effectiveness. This paper seeks to make a difference in managerial actions, specifically when implementing planned change, by directing them to use specific leadership actions during the change stage. While previous research has acknowledged the potential linkage between leadership and change effectiveness, a comprehensive exploration of this relationship within the realm of strategic change management remains lacking. This study aims to address this gap by comparing transactional and transformational leadership styles through the lens of the leadership-as-practice perspective. Specifically, this paper analyzes the alignment of these leadership styles with the Kotter model for implementing organizational change and investigates which leadership components or behaviors positively impact predetermined stages of change. Using the MLQ and a developed Kotter questionnaire, data was collected from 385 Lebanese employees working in SMEs experiencing change across the five provinces of Lebanon. PLS structural equation modeling was utilized to analyze the results, and the GoF value indicated that the study model is valid to be considered as a PLS global model. Our findings shed light on the dynamic interplay between leadership efficacy and distinct change stages. Rooted in the leadership-as-practice perspective, this study contributes a nuanced understanding of effective leadership’s crucial role in navigating the multifaceted challenges of organizational change, offering insights for practitioners and scholars alike.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali M. Mouazen & Ana Beatriz Hernández-Lara & Farid Abdallah & Muhieddine Ramadan & Jawad Chahine & Hala Baydoun & Najib Bou Zakhem, 2023. "Transformational and Transactional Leaders and Their Role in Implementing the Kotter Change Management Model Ensuring Sustainable Change: An Empirical Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-34, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:16-:d:1302904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/16/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/1/16/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Seijts, Gerard H. & Gandz, Jeffrey, 2018. "Transformational change and leader character," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 239-249.
    2. Martin Wood, 2005. "The Fallacy of Misplaced Leadership," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(6), pages 1101-1121, September.
    3. Joris Van der Voet & Ben S. Kuipers & Sandra Groeneveld, 2016. "Implementing Change in Public Organizations: The relationship between leadership and affective commitment to change in a public sector context," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 842-865, July.
    4. Tipu, Syed Awais Ahmad & Ryan, James C & Fantazy, Kamel A, 2012. "Transformational leadership in Pakistan: An examination of the relationship of transformational leadership to organizational culture and innovation propensity," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(4), pages 461-480, July.
    5. Schein, Edgar H., 1995. "Kurt Lewin in the clasroom, in the field, and in change theory : notes toward a model of managed learning," Working papers 3821-95., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    6. Crevani, Lucia & Lindgren, Monica & Packendorff, Johann, 2010. "Leadership, not leaders: On the study of leadership as practices and interactions," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 77-86, March.
    7. Ángel Gutiérrez-Iñiguez & Jesús Collado-Agudo & Josep Rialp-Criado, 2023. "The Role of Managers in Corporate Change Management: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-15, July.
    8. Nawal Abdalla Adam, 2022. "Employees’ Innovative Work Behavior and Change Management Phases in Government Institutions: The Mediating Role of Knowledge Sharing," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, February.
    9. Martin Natter & Andreas Mild & Markus Feurstein & Georg Dorffner & Alfred Taudes, 2001. "The Effect of Incentive Schemes and Organizational Arrangements on the New Product Development Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(8), pages 1029-1045, August.
    10. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    11. Wynne W. Chin & Barbara L. Marcolin & Peter R. Newsted, 2003. "A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 189-217, June.
    12. Elisabeta-Emilia Halmaghi & Diana-Elena Ranf & Dorel Badea, 2023. "Interdisciplinary Exploration between Organizational Culture and Sustainable Development Management Applied to the Romanian Higher Education Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Prashant & Seetharaman, A. & Raj, John Rudolph, 2013. "The usage and adoption of cloud computing by small and medium businesses," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 861-874.
    2. Asif Khan & Chih-Cheng Chen & Kwanrat Suanpong & Athapol Ruangkanjanases & Santhaya Kittikowit & Shih-Chih Chen, 2021. "The Impact of CSR on Sustainable Innovation Ambidexterity: The Mediating Role of Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Second-Order Social Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Teller, Christoph & Kotzab, Herbert & Grant, David B., 2012. "The relevance of shopper logistics for consumers of store-based retail formats," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 59-66.
    4. Kawai, Norifumi & Chung, Chul, 2019. "Expatriate utilization, subsidiary knowledge creation and performance: The moderating role of subsidiary strategic context," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 24-36.
    5. Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi & Idris Othman & Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ahmad A. Mousa & Ahmad M. A. Zamil, 2022. "Modeling the Impact of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOC) Implementation Factors on Continuance Intention of Students: PLS-SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, April.
    6. A. Q. Adeleke & A. Y. Bahaudin & A. M. Kamaruddeen, 2018. "Organizational Internal Factors and Construction Risk Management among Nigerian Construction Companies," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(4), pages 921-938, August.
    7. Yadgar Taha M. Hamakhan, 2020. "The effect of individual factors on user behaviour and the moderating role of trust: an empirical investigation of consumers’ acceptance of electronic banking in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 6(1), pages 1-29, December.
    8. Hedaya Abusafiya & Saad Suliman, 2017. "Causes and Effects of Cost Overrun on Construction Project in Bahrain: Part 2 (PLS-SEM Path Modelling)," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(7), pages 1-28, July.
    9. Elbashir, Mohamed Z. & Collier, Philip A. & Davern, Michael J., 2008. "Measuring the effects of business intelligence systems: The relationship between business process and organizational performance," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 135-153.
    10. Suning Zhu & Ashish Gupta & David Paradice & Casey Cegielski, 2019. "Understanding the Impact of Immersion and Authenticity on Satisfaction Behavior in Learning Analytics Tasks," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 791-814, August.
    11. Küster, Inés & Pascual, Juan J., 2021. "Non-monetary price perceived in e-peer-to peer accommodation. Airbnb guests’ perspective," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    12. Raelin, Joseph A., 2017. "Leadership-as-practice: Theory and application—An editor’s reflection," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 13(2), pages 215-221.
    13. Sahar Ahmadian & Somayeh Abdolmaleki, 2018. "Network typology and international opportunity recognition: moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 8(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Merschmann, Ulf & Thonemann, Ulrich W., 2011. "Supply chain flexibility, uncertainty and firm performance: An empirical analysis of German manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 130(1), pages 43-53, March.
    15. Wu, Jen-Her & Kao, Hao-Yun & Sambamurthy, Vallabh, 2016. "The integration effort and E-health compatibility effect and the mediating role of E-health synergy on hospital performance," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1288-1300.
    16. Arnold Kamis & Tziporah Stern & Daniel M. Ladik, 2010. "A flow-based model of web site intentions when users customize products in business-to-consumer electronic commerce," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 157-168, April.
    17. Ramazan Kaynak & Arzu Tuygun Toklu & Meral Elci & Ismail Tamer Toklu, 2016. "Effects of Occupational Health and Safety Practices on Organizational Commitment, Work Alienation, and Job Performance: Using the PLS-SEM Approach," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 146-146, April.
    18. Bruhn, Manfred & Schwarz, Jürgen & Batt, Verena, 2012. "Swissness als Erfolgsfaktor – Einsatz des Country-of-Origin zur Stärkung von Marken-Konsumenten-Beziehungen und der Markenbindung," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 66(2), pages 153-179.
    19. Hall, Matthew, 2011. "Do comprehensive performance measurement systems help or hinder managers' mental model development?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 36703, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    20. Edward C. S. Ku & Wu-Chung Wu & Yan Ju Chen, 2016. "The relationships among supply chain partnerships, customer orientation, and operational performance: the effect of flexibility," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 14(2), pages 415-441, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2023:i:1:p:16-:d:1302904. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.