IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i17p12807-d1224182.html

Can Service Trade Effectively Promote Carbon Emission Reduction?—Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Hongze Liang

    (School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

  • Xiaoli Hao

    (School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China)

Abstract

Carbon emissions have become a global issue of increasing concern due to their detrimental impact on the environment. Efforts to combat rising emissions have been taken globally. Despite China’s commitment to globalization, policymakers have faced challenges in adequately addressing this pressing issue. This paper aims to fill this gap by exploring a specific aspect of international trade, namely service trade. We theoretically analyzed the impact of service trade on carbon emissions and then empirically examined the impact using panel data from 2009 to 2019 of 30 provincial regions in China. Specifically, a non-linear model was used to capture the direct effect, particularly the potential non-linear relationship; a mediating effect model was applied to investigate the indirect effects; and a panel quantile model was adopted to examine the heterogeneity of the impact across different levels of carbon emissions. The research revealed: (1) The impact of service trade on carbon emissions exhibits a non-linear characteristic with a significant inverted U-shaped relationship being evident, indicating that the development of service trade can ultimately contribute to carbon reduction; (2) service trade can directly impact carbon emissions through its scale effect, while mechanism analysis showed that service trade can indirectly affect carbon emissions through its technological and structural effects, with carbon emission reduction also relying on these mechanisms; (3) There is significant heterogeneity in the impact of service trade on carbon emissions across geographic regions and at different levels of carbon emissions in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongze Liang & Xiaoli Hao, 2023. "Can Service Trade Effectively Promote Carbon Emission Reduction?—Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-23, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12807-:d:1224182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12807/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/17/12807/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Holger Görg & David Greenaway, 2016. "Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment?," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES AND HOST COUNTRY DEVELOPMENT Volume 53: World Scientific Studies in International Economics, chapter 9, pages 163-189, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    2. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    3. Koenker, Roger, 2004. "Quantile regression for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 74-89, October.
    4. Markusen, James R, 1989. "Trade in Producer Services and in Other Specialized Intermediate Inputs," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 79(1), pages 85-95, March.
    5. Eva Lyubich & Joseph Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2018. "Regulating Mismeasured Pollution: Implications of Firm Heterogeneity for Environmental Policy," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 136-142, May.
    6. Wu, Haitao & Xu, Lina & Ren, Siyu & Hao, Yu & Yan, Guoyao, 2020. "How do energy consumption and environmental regulation affect carbon emissions in China? New evidence from a dynamic threshold panel model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Viktor Stojkoski & Zoran Utkovski & Ljupco Kocarev, 2016. "The Impact of Services on Economic Complexity: Service Sophistication as Route for Economic Growth," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(8), pages 1-29, August.
    8. Lei Jin & Keran Duan & Chunming Shi & Xianwei Ju, 2017. "The Impact of Technological Progress in the Energy Sector on Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Analysis from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Shen Xiaobo & Chen Yu & Lin Boqiang, 2021. "Impact of Technological Progress and Industrial Structure Distortion on Energy Intensity in China," China Finance and Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 10(3), pages 25-46, November.
    10. Andrés Zahler & Leonardo Iacovone & Aaditya Mattoo, 2014. "Trade and Innovation in Services: Evidence from a Developing Economy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 953-979, July.
    11. Bhagwati, Jagdish N, 1984. "Why Are Services Cheaper in the Poor Countries?," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 94(374), pages 279-286, June.
    12. Shan, Yuli & Liu, Jianghua & Liu, Zhu & Xu, Xinwanghao & Shao, Shuai & Wang, Peng & Guan, Dabo, 2016. "New provincial CO2 emission inventories in China based on apparent energy consumption data and updated emission factors," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 742-750.
    13. Chuanwang Sun & Tiemeng Ma & Xiaoling Ouyang & Rong Wang, 2021. "Does Service Trade Globalization Promote Trade and Low-Carbon Globalization? Evidence from 30 Countries," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(5), pages 1455-1473, April.
    14. Hao, Xiaoli & Wen, Shufang & Xue, Yan & Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu, 2023. "How to improve environment, resources and economic efficiency in the digital era?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    15. Eva Lyubich & Joseph S. Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2018. "Regulating Mismeasured Pollution: Implications of Firm Heterogeneity for Environmental Policy," Working Papers 18-03, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    16. Hu, Hui & Xie, Nan & Fang, Debin & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2018. "The role of renewable energy consumption and commercial services trade in carbon dioxide reduction: Evidence from 25 developing countries," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 1229-1244.
    17. Roberts, Simon H. & Foran, Barney D. & Axon, Colin J. & Stamp, Alice V., 2021. "Is the service industry really low-carbon? Energy, jobs and realistic country GHG emissions reductions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    18. Arik Levinson, 2010. "Pollution and international trade in services," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 93-105, June.
    19. Zheng, Jiali & Mi, Zhifu & Coffman, D'Maris & Milcheva, Stanimira & Shan, Yuli & Guan, Dabo & Wang, Shouyang, 2019. "Regional development and carbon emissions in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 25-36.
    20. Ronald Steenblik & Massimo Geloso Grosso, 2011. "Trade in Services Related to Climate Change: An Exploratory Analysis," OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers 2011/3, OECD Publishing.
    21. Zhang, Wencheng & Peng, Shuijun & Sun, Chuanwang, 2015. "CO2 emissions in the global supply chains of services: An analysis based on a multi-regional input–output model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 93-103.
    22. Tuochen Li & Dongri Han & Shaosong Feng & Lei Liang, 2019. "Can Industrial Co-Agglomeration between Producer Services and Manufacturing Reduce Carbon Intensity in China?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    23. Feng, Rui & Shen, Chen & Huang, Liangxiong & Tang, Xuan, 2022. "Does trade in services improve carbon efficiency? —Analysis based on international panel data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    24. Zhang, Yu & Zhang, Sufang, 2018. "The impacts of GDP, trade structure, exchange rate and FDI inflows on China's carbon emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 347-353.
    25. Fourcroy, Charlotte & Gallouj, Faiz & Decellas, Fabrice, 2012. "Energy consumption in service industries: Challenging the myth of non-materiality," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 155-164.
    26. Eva Lyubich & Joseph Shapiro & Reed Walker, 2018. "Regulating Mismeasured Pollution: Implications of Firm Heterogeneity for Environmental Policy," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 108, pages 136-142, May.
    27. Wu, Linfei & Sun, Liwen & Qi, Peixiao & Ren, Xiangwei & Sun, Xiaoting, 2021. "Energy endowment, industrial structure upgrading, and CO2 emissions in China: Revisiting resource curse in the context of carbon emissions," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hang Yang & Xiao-Qing Ai, 2025. "The Impact of Digital Service Trade on the Carbon Intensity of Well-Being Under Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-30, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Feng, Rui & Shen, Chen & Huang, Liangxiong & Tang, Xuan, 2022. "Does trade in services improve carbon efficiency? —Analysis based on international panel data," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Xi Lin & Ling-Yun He, 2023. "The More the Merrier? Evidence from Firm-Level Exports and Environmental Performance in China," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(1), pages 125-172, January.
    3. Zhang, Zhaowen & Jiang, Yaohui, 2022. "Can green public procurement change energy efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Xu, Hao & Xu, Jingxuan & Wang, Jie & Hou, Xiang, 2023. "Reduce production or increase efficiency? Hazardous air pollutants regulation, energy use, and the synergistic effect on industrial enterprises' carbon emission," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    5. Benatti, Nicola & Groiss, Martin & Kelly, Petra & Lopez-Garcia, Paloma, 2024. "The impact of environmental regulation on clean innovation: are there crowding out effects?," Working Paper Series 2946, European Central Bank.
    6. Ritz, Robert A., 2022. "Global carbon price asymmetry," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Wang, Linhui & Chen, Qi & Dong, Zhiqing & Cheng, Lu, 2024. "The role of industrial intelligence in peaking carbon emissions in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Filippo Maria D'Arcangelo & Marzio Galeotti, 2022. "Environmental Policy and Investment Location: The Risk of Carbon Leakage in the EU ETS," Working Papers 2022.27, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Huang, Ruting & Yao, Xin, 2024. "City size and energy efficiency of Chinese manufacturing firms: An empirical study from a city characteristic perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    10. Michael Mehling & Robert Ritz, 2020. "Going beyond default intensities in an EU carbon border adjustment mechanism," Working Papers EPRG2026, Energy Policy Research Group, Cambridge Judge Business School, University of Cambridge.
    11. Dardati, Evangelina & Saygili, Meryem, 2021. "Are exporters cleaner? Another look at the trade-environment nexus," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    12. Kim, Taehyun & Kim, Yongjun, 2025. "Does corporate environmental responsibility create value?: Evidence from supreme Court rulings," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    13. Leisner, Jonathan & Munch, Jakob R. & Nielsen, August Twile & Schaur, Georg, 2023. "The Impact of Offshoring and Import Competition on Firm-Level Carbon Emissions," IZA Discussion Papers 16556, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Jingbo Cui & On Kit Tam & Bei Wang & Yan Zhang, 2020. "The environmental effect of trade liberalization: Evidence from China's manufacturing firms," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 3357-3383, December.
    15. Vural, Gulfer, 2020. "How do output, trade, renewable energy and non-renewable energy impact carbon emissions in selected Sub-Saharan African Countries?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    16. Curtis, E. Mark & Lee, Jonathan M., 2019. "When do environmental regulations backfire? Onsite industrial electricity generation, energy efficiency and policy instruments," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 174-194.
    17. Joseph S Shapiro, 2021. "The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 136(2), pages 831-886.
    18. Huang, Ruting & Miao, Qin & Liu, Chen & Li, Zhi, 2025. "Market segmentation and the dilemma of energy efficiency improvement: New insights from Chinese manufacturing firms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 322(C).
    19. Wang, Bo & Zhao, Jun & Dong, Kangyin & Jiang, Qingzhe, 2022. "High-quality energy development in China: Comprehensive assessment and its impact on CO2 emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    20. Jia, Shanghui & Chen, Xinhui & Jin, Jiayu, 2024. "Digital disruption and energy efficiency: The impact of regional digitalization on China's industrial sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:17:p:12807-:d:1224182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.