IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i23p13415-d694532.html

Exploring the Convergence of Resilience Processes and Sustainable Outcomes in Post-COVID, Post-Glasgow Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Jesse M. Keenan

    (School of Architecture, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
    Oxford Sustainable Finance Group, Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment, Oxford University, Oxford OX1 3QY, UK)

  • Benjamin D. Trump

    (U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Concord, MA 01742, USA
    School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA)

  • William Hynes

    (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 75016 Paris, France)

  • Igor Linkov

    (U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Concord, MA 01742, USA
    College of Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA)

Abstract

Resilience and sustainability have each offered a path forward for post-COVID economic recovery and a post-Glasgow global financial order. Yet, the relationships between these two concepts are largely unexplored in economic policy and investment strategies. In light of emerging systemic risks and global demands for more resolute investments in resilience and sustainability, this perspective article took the position that policymakers must begin to draw greater conceptual, empirical, and practical linkages between sustainability and resilience. This perspective article provided a simplified framework for understanding the positively reinforcing, negatively conflicting, and neutral relationships between different types of resilience and sustainability consistent with two propositions. The Reinforcement Proposition argues (i) that various resilience processes may drive sustainable outcomes, and/or (ii) that an allocation of sustainable resources may reinforce resilience processes, as well as the transformative adaptation of markets. Conversely, the Conflict Proposition argues (i) that certain resilience processes may perpetuate stability features that may thwart an economic transition toward sustainability, and/or (ii) that certain sustainability outcomes associated with reorganized economic structures and relationships may undermine resources for resilience. This framework provides policymakers with an opportunity to evaluate the convergent and conflicting trade-offs of resilience processes and sustainable outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Jesse M. Keenan & Benjamin D. Trump & William Hynes & Igor Linkov, 2021. "Exploring the Convergence of Resilience Processes and Sustainable Outcomes in Post-COVID, Post-Glasgow Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-12, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13415-:d:694532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13415/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/23/13415/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rezaee, Zabihollah, 2016. "Business sustainability research: A theoretical and integrated perspective," Journal of Accounting Literature, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 48-64.
    2. Ron Martin, 2012. "Regional economic resilience, hysteresis and recessionary shocks," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 12(1), pages 1-32, January.
    3. Colgan, Jeff D. & Green, Jessica F. & Hale, Thomas N., 2021. "Asset Revaluation and the Existential Politics of Climate Change," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(2), pages 586-610, February.
    4. G Dosi & M C Pereira & A Roventini & M E Virgillito, 2018. "Causes and consequences of hysteresis: aggregate demand, productivity, and employment," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 27(6), pages 1015-1044.
    5. Jason Hickel & Giorgos Kallis, 2020. "Is Green Growth Possible?," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(4), pages 469-486, June.
    6. William Hynes & Benjamin D. Trump & Patrick Love & Alan Kirman & Stephanie E. Galaitsi & Gabriela Ramos & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Resilient Financial Systems Can Soften the Next Global Financial Crisis," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(6), pages 311-318, November.
    7. Iris Lucas & Michel Cotsaftis & Cyrille Bertelle, 2018. "Self-Organization, Resilience and Robustness of Complex Systems Through an Application to Financial Market from an Agent-Based Approach," Post-Print hal-02114928, HAL.
    8. Aven, Terje & Zio, Enrico, 2021. "Globalization and global risk: How risk analysis needs to be enhanced to be effective in confronting current threats," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    9. Lamperti, F. & Dosi, G. & Napoletano, M. & Roventini, A. & Sapio, A., 2020. "Climate change and green transitions in an agent-based integrated assessment model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    10. Adam Rose & Shu‐Yi Liao, 2005. "Modeling Regional Economic Resilience to Disasters: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Water Service Disruptions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(1), pages 75-112, February.
    11. Anand, Kartik & Gai, Prasanna & Kapadia, Sujit & Brennan, Simon & Willison, Matthew, 2013. "A network model of financial system resilience," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 219-235.
    12. Edward B. Barbier, 2010. "Green Stimulus, Green Recovery and Global Imbalances," World Economics, World Economics, 1 Ivory Square, Plantation Wharf, London, United Kingdom, SW11 3UE, vol. 11(2), pages 149-177, April.
    13. Wei Xie & Adam Rose & Shantong Li & Jianwu He & Ning Li & Tariq Ali, 2018. "Dynamic Economic Resilience and Economic Recovery from Disasters: A Quantitative Assessment," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(6), pages 1306-1318, June.
    14. Cars Hommes, 2021. "Behavioral and Experimental Macroeconomics and Policy Analysis: A Complex Systems Approach," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 59(1), pages 149-219, March.
    15. Zhou, Ziqiao & Zhang, Lin, 2021. "Destructive destruction or creative destruction? Unraveling the effects of tropical cyclones on economic growth," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 380-393.
    16. Brendan O'Dwyer & Jeffrey Unerman, 2020. "Shifting the focus of sustainability accounting from impacts to risks and dependencies: researching the transformative potential of TCFD reporting," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 33(5), pages 1113-1141, June.
    17. Romain Svartzman & Patrick Bolton & Morgan Despres & Luiz Awazu Pereira Da Silva & Frédéric Samama, 2021. "Central banks, financial stability and policy coordination in the age of climate uncertainty: a three-layered analytical and operational framework," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 563-580, April.
    18. Edward B. Barbier, 2020. "Greening the Post-pandemic Recovery in the G20," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 685-703, August.
    19. Nikolaos A. Skondras & Demetrios E. Tsesmelis & Constantina G. Vasilakou & Christos A. Karavitis, 2020. "Resilience–Vulnerability Analysis: A Decision-Making Framework for Systems Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Giovanni Dosi & Marcelo C. Pereira & Andrea Roventini & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2018. "Causes et consequences of hysteresis : aggregate demand, productivity and employment," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/4h9cnu4n2k8, Sciences Po.
    21. Philipp Krueger & Zacharias Sautner & Laura T Starks, 2020. "The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 33(3), pages 1067-1111.
    22. Karl Widerquist, 2018. "The Bottom Line," Exploring the Basic Income Guarantee, in: A Critical Analysis of Basic Income Experiments for Researchers, Policymakers, and Citizens, chapter 0, pages 93-98, Palgrave Macmillan.
    23. Eric Specking & Bobby Cottam & Gregory Parnell & Edward Pohl & Matthew Cilli & Randy Buchanan & Zephan Wade & Colin Small, 2019. "Assessing Engineering Resilience for Systems with Multiple Performance Measures," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1899-1912, September.
    24. William Hynes & Benjamin D. Trump & Patrick Love & Alan Kirman & Stephanie E. Galaitsi & Gabriela Ramos & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Resilient Financial Systems Can Soften the Next Global Financial Crisis," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(6), pages 311-318, November.
    25. Seoyoung Yu & Donghyun Kim, 2021. "Changes in Regional Economic Resilience after the 2008 Global Economic Crisis: The Case of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    26. Peter Klimek & Sebastian Poledna & Stefan Thurner, 2019. "Quantifying economic resilience from input–output susceptibility to improve predictions of economic growth and recovery," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    27. Demirguc-Kunt,Asli & Klapper,Leora & Singer,Dorothe, 2017. "Financial inclusion and inclusive growth : a review of recent empirical evidence," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8040, The World Bank.
    28. Peter Klimek & Sebastian Poledna & Stefan Thurner, 2019. "Economic resilience from input-output susceptibility improves predictions of economic growth and recovery," Papers 1903.03203, arXiv.org.
    29. Xiaogang He & Kairui Feng & Xiaoyuan Li & Amy B. Craft & Yoshihide Wada & Peter Burek & Eric F. Wood & Justin Sheffield, 2019. "Solar and wind energy enhances drought resilience and groundwater sustainability," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    30. Paolo Caro & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Regional determinants of economic resilience," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 235-240, March.
    31. Giovanni Dosi & Marcelo Pereira & Andrea Roventini & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2018. "Causes et consequences of hysteresis : aggregate demand, productivity and employment," Sciences Po publications info:hdl:2441/hiaqa97n684, Sciences Po.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bilal Chabane & Dragan Komljenovic & Georges Abdul-Nour, 2023. "Converging on human-centred industry, resilient processes, and sustainable outcomes in asset management frameworks," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(4), pages 663-679, December.
    2. Vito Imbrenda & Rosa Coluzzi & Valerio Di Stefano & Gianluca Egidi & Luca Salvati & Caterina Samela & Tiziana Simoniello & Maria Lanfredi, 2022. "Modeling Spatio-Temporal Divergence in Land Vulnerability to Desertification with Local Regressions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-20, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ravaioli, Giacomo & Lamperti, Francesco & Roventini, Andrea & Domingos, Tiago, 2025. "Tackling emissions and inequality: policy insights from an agent-based model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Lamperti, Francesco & Bosetti, Valentina & Roventini, Andrea & Tavoni, Massimo & Treibich, Tania, 2021. "Three green financial policies to address climate risks," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Ciola, Emanuele & Turco, Enrico Maria & Rizzati, Massimiliano Carlo Pietro & Bazzana, Davide & Vergalli, Sergio, 2025. "Taking the green pill: Macroeconomic and financial risks of the energy transition in the MATRIX model," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    4. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/401t6job098n79ch91o9giov9d is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Dosi, Giovanni & Lamperti, Francesco & Mazzucato, Mariana & Napoletano, Mauro & Roventini, Andrea, 2023. "Mission-oriented policies and the “Entrepreneurial State” at work: An agent-based exploration," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    6. Taberna, Alessandro & Filatova, Tatiana & Roventini, Andrea & Lamperti, Francesco, 2022. "Coping with increasing tides: Evolving agglomeration dynamics and technological change under exacerbating hazards," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Wang, Xueli & Wang, Lei & Zhang, Xuerong & Fan, Fei, 2022. "The spatiotemporal evolution of COVID-19 in China and its impact on urban economic resilience," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    8. Dosi, G. & Pereira, M.C. & Roventini, A. & Virgillito, M.E., 2022. "Technological paradigms, labour creation and destruction in a multi-sector agent-based model," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(10).
    9. Elias Giannakis & Theofanis P. Mamuneas, 2022. "Labour productivity and regional labour markets resilience in Europe," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 68(3), pages 691-712, June.
    10. Borsato, Andrea & Lorentz, André, 2025. "Public science vs. mission-oriented policies in long-run growth: An agent-based model," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 129-146.
    11. Giovanni Dosi & Andrea Roventini & Emmanuele Russo, 2020. "Public Policies And The Art Of Catching Up," Working Papers hal-03242369, HAL.
    12. Giovanni Dosi & Andrea Roventini & Emanuele Russo, 2021. "Public policies and the art of catching up: matching the historical evidence with a multicountry agent-based model [Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 30(4), pages 1011-1036.
    13. Botta, Alberto & Tippet, Ben, 2020. "The roots of a divided eurozone: rigid labour markets or asymmetric technology-macroeconomic regimes?," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 30958, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    14. Campiglio, Emanuele & Lamperti, Francesco & Terranova, Roberta, 2024. "Believe me when I say green! Heterogeneous expectations and climate policy uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    15. Botta, Alberto & Caverzasi, Eugenio & Russo, Alberto, 2024. "Same old song: On the macroeconomic and distributional effects of leaving a Low Interest Rate Environment," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 552-570.
    16. Giovanni Dosi & Marcelo C. Pereira & Andrea Roventini & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2024. "The political economy of complex evolving systems: the case of declining unionization and rising inequalities," LEM Papers Series 2024/13, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    17. Giovanni Dosi & Federico Riccio & Maria Enrica Virgillito, 2022. "Specialize or diversify? And in What? Trade composition, quality of specialization, and persistent growth [Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind]," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 31(2), pages 301-337.
    18. Andr√©s O. D√°vila-Ospina, 2023. "Hysteresis From Monetary Policy Mistakes: How Bad Could It Be?," Documentos CEDE 21003, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    19. Patrick Mellacher, 2021. "Growth, Inequality and Declining Business Dynamism in a Unified Schumpeter Mark I + II Model," Papers 2111.09407, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    20. Hoxha, Sergei & Kleinknecht, Alfred, 2020. "When labour market rigidities are useful for innovation. Evidence from German IAB firm-level data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(7).
    21. Manfred Füllsack & Daniel Reisinger & Marie Kapeller & Georg Jäger, 2022. "Early warning signals from the periphery," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 665-685, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:23:p:13415-:d:694532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.