IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5759-d558892.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Facilitators of Specialist Knowledge Dispersion in the Digital Era

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl

    (Department of Organizational Behavior, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Kraków, Poland)

  • Małgorzata Ćwiek

    (Department of Statistics, Cracow University of Economics, 31-510 Kraków, Poland)

Abstract

The digital revolution has triggered disproportions resulting from unequal access to knowledge and various related skills, because the constituting new civilization is based on specific, high-context, and personalized professional knowledge. In response to these dependencies, and in line with the sustainability paradigm, the issue of diffusion of knowledge, especially of the professional type, is of particular importance in eliminating the increasing digital inequalities. Therefore, the main challenge is to stimulate the free dispersion of intellectual workers’ knowledge. Their openness and commitment, devoid of opportunistic and knowledge-flow restraining attitudes, are prerequisites for the development of a sustainable society (synonymous with Civilization 5.0 or Humanity 5.0). The article endeavors to verify trust as the leading factor of effective specialist knowledge exchange. Its purpose is to analyze and diagnose the components, enablers, and types of trust that affect the diffusion of specific forms of professional knowledge in different groups of organizational stakeholders treated as knowledge agents. Systematic scientific literature analysis, expert evaluation, and structured questionnaires were used to develop and verify the hypotheses. Direct semistructured individual interviews, focus-group online interviews, computer-assisted telephone interviews, and computer-assisted web interviews were also applied in the paper. The research results confirmed the assumption that reliability-based trust, built on competence-based trust and reinforced by benevolence-based trust, is the foundation of the exchange of professional knowledge. It also supported the hypotheses that this process depends on the group of knowledge agents, the dominant form of trust, as well as its enhancers and types of exchanged knowledge. Conducted explorations constitute a theoretical and practical contribution to the subject of professional knowledge exchange. They fill the research gap regarding vehicles of trust as a factor of specialist knowledge diffusion and provide general, practical guidelines in terms of shaping individual components of competence-, benevolence-, and reliability-based trust due to the type of transferred knowledge and the group of knowledge agents involved in its circulation.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek, 2021. "Social Facilitators of Specialist Knowledge Dispersion in the Digital Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5759-:d:558892
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5759/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5759/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharmila Jayasingam & Muhiniswari Govindasamy & Sharan Kaur Garib Singh, 2016. "Instilling affective commitment: insights on what makes knowledge workers want to stay," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 266-288, March.
    2. Amitabh Anand & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione, 2020. "Why should I share knowledge with others? A review-based framework on events leading to knowledge hiding," Post-Print hal-02870014, HAL.
    3. Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir & Guðmundur Valur Oddsson, 2017. "A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity—Analysis of the Problem Situation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
    4. Wioleta Kucharska, 2017. "Relationships between Trust and Collaborative Culture in The Context of Tacit Knowledge Sharing," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 14(4), pages 61-78.
    5. Jalil Heidary Dahooie & Mohammad Reza Ghezel Arsalan & Ali Zolghadr Shojai, 2018. "A valid and applicable measurement method for knowledge worker productivity," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 67(9), pages 1764-1791, November.
    6. Gorman, Michael E, 2002. "Types of Knowledge and Their Roles in Technology Transfer," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 27(3), pages 219-231, June.
    7. Argote, Linda & Ingram, Paul, 2000. "Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 150-169, May.
    8. John A. Cotsomitis, 2018. "Is the learning economy a viable concept for understanding the modern economy?," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 45(3), pages 492-507, March.
    9. Elizabeth Webster & Paul H. Jensen, 2006. "Investment in Intangible Capital: An Enterprise Perspective," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 82(256), pages 82-96, March.
    10. Fabio Zagonari, 2016. "Four Sustainability Paradigms for Environmental Management: A Methodological Analysis and an Empirical Study Based on 30 Italian Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-34, May.
    11. Hegadekatti, Kartik & S G, Yatish, 2017. "The Programmable Economy: Envisaging an Entire Planned Economic System as a Single Computer through Blockchain Networks," MPRA Paper 82831, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 May 2017.
    12. Amitabh Anand & Isabelle Walsh & Sandra Moffett, 2019. "Does humility facilitate knowledge sharing? Investigating the role of humble knowledge inquiry and response," Post-Print halshs-02284002, HAL.
    13. Jerry Courvisanos & Stuart Mackenzie, 2014. "Innovation economics and the role of the innovative entrepreneur in economic theory," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 41-61.
    14. Ya-Hui Ling, 2013. "The influence of intellectual capital on organizational performance—Knowledge management as moderator," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 937-964, September.
    15. Muhammad Khalique & Jamal Abdul Nassir bin Shaari & Abu Hassan bin Md. Isa, 2013. "The road to the development of intellectual capital theory," International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(2), pages 122-136.
    16. Huang, Yimin & Wilkinson, Ian F., 2014. "A case study of the development of trust in a business relation: Implications for a dynamic theory of trust," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 7(1), pages 254-279.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fabio De Felice & Marta Travaglioni & Antonella Petrillo, 2021. "Innovation Trajectories for a Society 5.0," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(11), pages 1-30, November.
    2. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek & Bernard Ziębicki & Anna Wójcik-Karpacz, 2021. "Organizational Culture as a Prerequisite for Knowledge Transfer among IT Professionals: The Case of Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek & Bernard Ziębicki & Anna Wójcik-Karpacz, 2021. "Organizational Culture as a Prerequisite for Knowledge Transfer among IT Professionals: The Case of Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, December.
    2. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Cwiek, 2021. "Trust in the Diffusion of Professional Knowledge," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 989-1009.
    3. Perotti, Francesco Antonio & Ferraris, Alberto & Candelo, Elena & Busso, Donatella, 2022. "The dark side of knowledge sharing: Exploring “knowledge sabotage” and its antecedents," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 422-432.
    4. Shu-Hsien Liao & Chih-Chiang Chen & Da-Chian Hu & Yu-chun Chung & Min-Ju Yang, 2017. "Developing a sustainable competitive advantage: absorptive capacity, knowledge transfer and organizational learning," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 42(6), pages 1431-1450, December.
    5. Busola D. Akintayo & Oluwafemi E. Ige & Olubayo M. Babatunde & Oludolapo A. Olanrewaju, 2023. "Evaluation and Prioritization of Power-Generating Systems Using a Life Cycle Assessment and a Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Felipe A. Csaszar & Nicolaj Siggelkow, 2010. "How Much to Copy? Determinants of Effective Imitation Breadth," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 661-676, June.
    7. Bertermann, Britta & Virgillito, Alfredo & Naegele, Gerhard & Wilkesmann, Uwe, 2015. "Werkzeugkasten Wissenstransfer: Entwicklung einer praktischen Handlungshilfe für Betriebs- und Personalräte," Study / edition der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf, volume 127, number 291.
    8. Boeker, Warren & Howard, Michael D. & Basu, Sandip & Sahaym, Arvin, 2021. "Interpersonal relationships, digital technologies, and innovation in entrepreneurial ventures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 495-507.
    9. Sseruyange, J. & Bulte, E., 2018. "Do Incentives matter for Knowledge Diffusion? Experimental Evidence from Uganda," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 275896, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Jarratt, Denise & Ceric, Arnela, 2015. "The complexity of trust in business collaborations," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 2-12.
    11. Oubrich, Mourad & Hakmaoui, Abdelati & Benhayoun, Lamiae & Solberg Söilen, Klaus & Abdulkader, Bisan, 2021. "Impacts of leadership style, organizational design and HRM practices on knowledge hiding: The indirect roles of organizational justice and competitive work environment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 488-499.
    12. Shahid Qureshi & Sarfraz Mian, 2021. "Transfer of entrepreneurship education best practices from business schools to engineering and technology institutions: evidence from Pakistan," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 366-392, April.
    13. Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir & Guðmundur Valur Oddsson, 2017. "A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity—Analysis of the Problem Situation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
    14. Tammy L. Madsen & Elaine Mosakowski & Srilata Zaheer, 2003. "Knowledge Retention and Personnel Mobility: The Nondisruptive Effects of Inflows of Experience," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 173-191, April.
    15. Jeroen Struben & Brandon H. Lee & Christopher B. Bingham, 2020. "Collective Action Problems and Resource Allocation During Market Formation," Post-Print hal-02927584, HAL.
    16. Haradhan Kumar MOHAJAN, 2019. "Knowledge Sharing among Employees in Organizations," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 8(1), pages 52-61, March.
    17. Caligiuri, Paula & Bonache, Jaime, 2016. "Evolving and enduring challenges in global mobility," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(1), pages 127-141.
    18. Young-Choon Kim & Taekjin Shin & Sangchan Park, 2021. "Enhancing firm performance through intra-group managerial experience: Evidence from group-affiliated firms in Korea," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 435-465, June.
    19. Winkler Renata, 2014. "Training and knowledge transfer at the interface of cultures," Management, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 1-14, May.
    20. Wang, Haiying & Moore, Jack Murdoch & Wang, Jun & Small, Michael, 2021. "The distinct roles of initial transmission and retransmission in the persistence of knowledge in complex networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 392(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5759-:d:558892. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.