IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jecomi/v5y2017i3p28-d106647.html

A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity—Analysis of the Problem Situation

Author

Listed:
  • Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 101, Iceland)

  • Guðmundur Valur Oddsson

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Iceland, Reykjavik 101, Iceland)

Abstract

Low knowledge worker productivity is an important problem that needs to be addressed. Current research addressing this problem is fragmented and deals with different isolated elements of the problem. There is a need for a holistic approach to knowledge worker productivity. This paper takes the first steps of a holistic approach to knowledge worker productivity by using soft systems methodology to describe the problem situation. The main challenge of this research was the abstraction of the results from two literature reviews into simple rich pictures and specific root definitions to identify the fundamentals of knowledge worker productivity. The problem situation was explored from the perspective of two problem owners, the organization and the individual knowledge worker. The rich picture from the perspective of the organization highlighted that the organization must communicate what they perceive as value and create a work environment that promotes collaboration, encourages knowledge sharing, motivates and fulfills the needs of their knowledge workers. The rich picture from the perspective of the individual knowledge worker highlighted the fact that knowledge workers need to manage their personal resources, be effective and efficient to maximize their own productivity. This paper attempts to integrate these two perspectives into a holistic view.

Suggested Citation

  • Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir & Guðmundur Valur Oddsson, 2017. "A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity—Analysis of the Problem Situation," Economies, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p:28-:d:106647
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/5/3/28/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7099/5/3/28/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chin-Hui Lai, 2015. "Applying knowledge flow mining to group recommendation methods for task-based groups," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(3), pages 545-563, March.
    2. Yoram M. Kalman & Gilad Ravid, 2015. "Filing, piling, and everything in between: The dynamics of E-mail inbox management," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 66(12), pages 2540-2552, December.
    3. Sharmila Jayasingam & Muhiniswari Govindasamy & Sharan Kaur Garib Singh, 2016. "Instilling affective commitment: insights on what makes knowledge workers want to stay," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 39(3), pages 266-288, March.
    4. Alfonso Gambardella & Claudio Panico & Giovanni Valentini, 2015. "Strategic incentives to human capital," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1), pages 37-52, January.
    5. Joseph Barjis & Ashish Gupta & Ramesh Sharda, 2011. "Knowledge work and communication challenges in networked enterprises," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(5), pages 615-619, November.
    6. Duen-Ren Liu & Chin-Hui Lai & Ya-Ting Chen, 2012. "Document recommendations based on knowledge flows: A hybrid of personalized and group-based approaches," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(10), pages 2100-2117, October.
    7. Gunasekaran, A. & Korukonda, A. R. & Virtanen, I. & Yli-Olli, P., 1994. "Improving productivity and quality in manufacturing organizations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 169-183, September.
    8. Duen‐Ren Liu & Chin‐Hui Lai & Ya‐Ting Chen, 2012. "Document recommendations based on knowledge flows: A hybrid of personalized and group‐based approaches," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 63(10), pages 2100-2117, October.
    9. Keneley, Monica, 2007. "Supervising outworkers: the case of the AMP and the sale of industrial life insurance 1905-1940," Working Papers eco_2007_10, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek, 2021. "Social Facilitators of Specialist Knowledge Dispersion in the Digital Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    2. Helga Guðrún Óskarsdóttir & Guðmundur Valur Oddsson & Jón Þór Sturluson & Rögnvaldur Jóhann Sæmundsson, 2021. "A Soft Systems Approach to Knowledge Worker Productivity: A Purposeful Activity Model for the Individual," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacob Rubæk Holm & Kristian Nielsen & Bram Timmermans, 2025. "Bureaucracy, work organization, and the transition to entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 2179-2195, April.
    2. Tuhin Chaturvedi & John E. Prescott, 2022. "Resource Reconfiguration During Technological Change," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 240-265, September.
    3. Di Lorenzo, Francesco & Almeida, Paul, 2017. "The role of relative performance in inter-firm mobility of inventors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(6), pages 1162-1174.
    4. Sharon Belenzon & Ulya Tsolmon, 2016. "Market frictions and the competitive advantage of internal labor markets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(7), pages 1280-1303, July.
    5. Pardeep Gupta & Sachit Vardhan, 2016. "Optimizing OEE, productivity and production cost for improving sales volume in an automobile industry through TPM: a case study," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(10), pages 2976-2988, May.
    6. Douglas P. Hannah & Ron Tidhar & Kathleen M. Eisenhardt, 2021. "Analytic models in strategy, organizations, and management research: A guide for consumers," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(2), pages 329-360, February.
    7. David R. Williams & Betty S. Coffey & Carlton C. Young, 2018. "Human capital and agency effects on CEO compensation of IPO biopharmaceutical firms and the market’s response," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 22(2), pages 315-337, June.
    8. Christoph Grimpe & Wolfgang Sofka & Ulrich Kaiser, 2023. "Competing for digital human capital: The retention effect of digital expertise in MNC subsidiaries," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(4), pages 657-685, June.
    9. Jana Gallus & Bruno S. Frey, 2016. "Awards: A strategic management perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(8), pages 1699-1714, August.
    10. Bryan Hong, 2020. "Power to the outsiders: External hiring and decision authority allocation within organizations," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(9), pages 1628-1652, September.
    11. Bea Chiang, 2013. "Indirect Labor Costs And Implications For Overhead Allocation," Accounting & Taxation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(1), pages 85-96.
    12. Filippo Carlo Wezel & Martin Ruef, 2020. "Learning Against the Wind: Diversity and Performance on the Ships of the Dutch East India Company," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 330-347, December.
    13. Chen, Siyu & Guo, Qing, 2023. "Fintech, strategic incentives and investment to human capital, and MSEs innovation," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek, 2021. "Social Facilitators of Specialist Knowledge Dispersion in the Digital Era," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-25, May.
    15. Andrea Morrison, 2018. "Spinoffs, parents, and institutions: Evidence from the Italian motorcycle industry," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1840, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Nov 2018.
    16. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:special1:p:989-1009 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Jeongwon Lee & Kiyoon Shin & Hongbum Kim & Junseok Hwang, 2025. "Efficiency of Innovation Policy with Different Types of R&D Planning: Evidence from South Korea’s Information and Communication Technology Sector," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(1), pages 630-662, March.
    18. Demeter, Krisztina & Chikán, Attila & Matyusz, Zsolt, 2011. "Labour productivity change: Drivers, business impact and macroeconomic moderators," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 215-223, May.
    19. Odilon Câmara & Nan Jia & Joseph Raffiee, 2023. "Reputation, Competition, and Lies in Labor Market Recommendations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(11), pages 7022-7043, November.
    20. Bowei Cai & Jiangmin Yang & Gengzhi Huang, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics in Economic, Social, and Environmental Upgrading in China: Coupling Coordination and Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, December.
    21. Anna Pietruszka-Ortyl & Małgorzata Ćwiek & Bernard Ziębicki & Anna Wójcik-Karpacz, 2021. "Organizational Culture as a Prerequisite for Knowledge Transfer among IT Professionals: The Case of Energy Companies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-32, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jecomi:v:5:y:2017:i:3:p:28-:d:106647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.