IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i10p5543-d555553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cooperatives in the Wine Industry: Sustainable Management Practices and Digitalisation

Author

Listed:
  • Barbara Richter

    (Department of Wine and Beverage Business, Hochschule Geisenheim University, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany)

  • Jon H. Hanf

    (Department of Wine and Beverage Business, Hochschule Geisenheim University, 65366 Geisenheim, Germany)

Abstract

In Europe, cooperatives have a long tradition and are widespread in the agricultural sector. Cooperatives in the wine sector of some EU countries even surpass a market share of more than 50%. In Germany, the first wine cooperative was established in 1868 in the Ahr region. Despite the decline in the number of cooperatives, of members and of the vineyard area cultivated by cooperatives, wine cooperatives are still accountable for roughly a quarter of the German vineyard area. Due to developments in the field of sustainability and digitalisation, cooperatives are facing increasing pressure. Based on the definition of cooperatives by the International Co-operative Alliance, one can conclude that cooperatives are a sustainable form of enterprise. A previous study from 2019 showed that sustainability and digitalisation were not mentioned by cooperative management as important topics in the competitive analysis. Also, sustainable management practices have not been analysed explicitly for wine cooperatives so far. We therefore consider sustainability and digitalisation in the context of the strategic management of wine cooperatives. Our article does not aim to show further development in the areas of sustainability and digitalisation but rather to unveil existing managerial practices in order to provide a basis for management decisions. As only limited knowledge exists, a qualitative approach was chosen. Interviews were conducted with the management of wine cooperatives ( n = 13) and representatives of the regional and national cooperative associations, which in turn represent the wine cooperatives as a whole ( n = 4). A data content analysis was performed. The results describe state of the art of sustainable management practices and digitalisation in wine cooperatives. Even if the understanding of sustainability and digitalisation is quite similar among the respondents, the operationalisation in the cooperatives differs strongly. However, it is clear that innovation, adaptability and sustainability are strongly interlinked. Options for future research and the limitations of the study are provided as well.

Suggested Citation

  • Barbara Richter & Jon H. Hanf, 2021. "Cooperatives in the Wine Industry: Sustainable Management Practices and Digitalisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-20, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5543-:d:555553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5543/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/10/5543/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Torres, Pedro & Augusto, Mário, 2020. "Digitalisation, social entrepreneurship and national well-being," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    2. repec:bla:annpce:v:85:y:2014:i:4:p:683-684 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Salzmann, Oliver & Ionescu-somers, Aileen & Steger, Ulrich, 2005. "The Business Case for Corporate Sustainability:: Literature Review and Research Options," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 27-36, February.
    4. Ilaria Zambon & Andrea Colantoni & Massimo Cecchini & Enrico Maria Mosconi, 2018. "Rethinking Sustainability within the Viticulture Realities Integrating Economy, Landscape and Energy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-13, January.
    5. Michael Paul Kramer & Linda Bitsch & Jon Hanf, 2021. "Blockchain and Its Impacts on Agri-Food Supply Chain Network Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Michael L. Cook, 1995. "The Future of U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives: A Neo-Institutional Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(5), pages 1153-1159.
    7. Ringle, Günther, 2007. "Genossenschaftliche Prinzipien im Spannungsfeld zwischen Tradition und Modernität," Wismar Discussion Papers 01/2007, Hochschule Wismar, Wismar Business School.
    8. Nambisan, Satish & Wright, Mike & Feldman, Maryann, 2019. "The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    9. Cristina Santini & Alessio Cavicchi & Leonardo Casini, 2013. "Sustainability in the wine industry: key questions and research trends a," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Helen Borland & Véronique Ambrosini & Adam Lindgreen & Joëlle Vanhamme, 2016. "Building Theory at the Intersection of Ecological Sustainability and Strategic Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(2), pages 293-307, May.
    11. Iselborn, Maximilian & Hanf, Jon & Ingenwerth, Lea & Sparer, Patrizia & Thein, Anne, 2015. "Analyse der Rollenverteilung in Winzergenossenschaften im Kontext des Qualitätsmanagements," 55th Annual Conference, Giessen, Germany, September 23-25, 2015 209190, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    12. Jasper Grashuis, 2019. "The impact of brand equity on the financial performance of marketing cooperatives," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(2), pages 234-248, April.
    13. Benedetto, Graziella & Rugani, Benedetto & Vázquez-Rowe, Ian, 2014. "Rebound effects due to economic choices when assessing the environmental sustainability of wine," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(P1), pages 167-173.
    14. Peter Helmberger & Sidney Hoos, 1962. "Cooperative Enterprise and Organization Theory," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 44(2), pages 275-290.
    15. Frick, Bernd, 2017. "Some Cooperatives Produce Great Wines, but the Majority Does Not: Complementary Institutional Mechanisms to Improve the Performance of an Indispensable Organizational Form," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(4), pages 386-394, November.
    16. Richard Phillips, 1953. "Economic Nature of the Cooperative Association," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 35(1), pages 74-87.
    17. Robert P. King & Michael Boehlje & Michael L. Cook & Steven T. Sonka, 2010. "Agribusiness Economics and Management," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(2), pages 554-570.
    18. Antonio Manuel Ciruela-Lorenzo & Ana Rosa Del-Aguila-Obra & Antonio Padilla-Meléndez & Juan José Plaza-Angulo, 2020. "Digitalization of Agri-Cooperatives in the Smart Agriculture Context. Proposal of a Digital Diagnosis Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, February.
    19. Loose, Simone & Pabst, Evelyn, 2018. "Current State of the German and International Wine Markets," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 67(Supplemen), April.
    20. Christine Legner & Torsten Eymann & Thomas Hess & Christian Matt & Tilo Böhmann & Paul Drews & Alexander Mädche & Nils Urbach & Frederik Ahlemann, 2017. "Digitalization: Opportunity and Challenge for the Business and Information Systems Engineering Community," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 59(4), pages 301-308, August.
    21. Jos Bijman & Constantine Iliopoulos, 2014. "Farmers' Cooperatives in the Eu: Policies, Strategies, and Organization," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 85(4), pages 497-508, December.
    22. Capitello, Roberta & Agnoli, Lara, 2009. "Development of strategic options for Italian wine cooperatives through a new membership integration pattern," 113th Seminar, September 3-6, 2009, Chania, Crete, Greece 57656, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    23. Frank Robotka, 1947. "A Theory of Cooperation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 29(1), pages 94-114.
    24. Eugenio Pomarici & Riccardo Vecchio & Angela Mariani, 2015. "Wineries’ Perception of Sustainability Costs and Benefits: An Exploratory Study in California," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-11, December.
    25. Rucht, Dieter, 2019. "Faszinosum Fridays for Future," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 69(47/48), pages 4-9.
    26. Hanf, Jon Henrich & Schweickert, Erik, 2007. "Changes in the wine chain - Managerial challenges and threats for German wine co-ops," Working Papers 37315, American Association of Wine Economists.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kahia, Montassar & Moulahi, Tarek & Mahfoudhi, Sami & Boubaker, Sabri & Omri, Anis, 2022. "A machine learning process for examining the linkage among disaggregated energy consumption, economic growth, and environmental degradation," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    2. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    3. Inmaculada Carrasco & Juan Sebastián Castillo-Valero & Carmen Córcoles & Marcos Carchano, 2021. "Greening Wine Exports? Changes in the Carbon Footprint of Spanish Wine Exports," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-13, August.
    4. Coralie Haller & Daria Plotkina & Tan Vo-Thanh, 2021. "Social Media Use of Small Wineries in Alsace: Resources and Motivations Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Henriett Matyi & Péter Tamás, 2023. "Operational Concept of an Innovative Management Framework for Choosing the Optimal Packaging System for Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Maria José Gomes & António Sousa & Jorge Novas & Ricardo Vinícius Dias Jordão, 2021. "Environmental Sustainability in Viticulture as a Balanced Scorecard Perspective of the Wine Industry: Evidence for the Portuguese Region of Alentejo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iselborn, M. & Jungbluth, L. & Hanf, J.H., 2015. "Probleme des Qualitätsmanagements bei Winzergenossenschaften," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 50, March.
    2. Ortmann, Gerald F. & King, Robert P., 2006. "Small-Scale Farmers in South Africa: Can Agricultural Cooperatives Facilitate Access to Input and Product Markets?," Staff Papers 13930, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    3. Ahmet Candemir & Sabine Duvaleix & Laure Latruffe, 2021. "Agricultural Cooperatives And Farm Sustainability – A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(4), pages 1118-1144, September.
    4. George Hendrikse & Li Feng, 2013. "Interfirm cooperatives," Chapters, in: Anna Grandori (ed.), Handbook of Economic Organization, chapter 26, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Ladd, George W., 1981. "The Objective of the Cooperative Association," AAEA Miscellaneous Paper Archive 337346, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Xiao Peng & George Hendrikse & Wendong Deng, 2018. "Communication and Innovation in Cooperatives," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(4), pages 1184-1209, December.
    7. Valentinov, Vladislav & Iliopoulos, Constantine, 2013. "Economic theories of nonprofits and agricultural cooperatives compared: New perspectives for nonprofit scholars," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 42(1), pages 109-126.
    8. Condon, Andrew M. & Cotterill, Ronald W. & Rhodes, V. James & Shaffer, James D. & Staatz, John M., 1987. "Cooperative Theory: New Approaches," Service Reports (SR) 280614, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
    9. Louis-Antoine Saïsset & Géraldine Riviere-Giordano & Paul Amadieu, 2016. "The key role of stakeholders on wine cooperatives governance and performance," Post-Print hal-02742867, HAL.
    10. Thembi Xaba & Nyankomo Marwa & Babita Mathur-Helm, 2018. "Efficiency and Profitability Analysis of Agricultural Cooperatives in Mpumalanga, South Africa," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(6), pages 1-10.
    11. Marc Dressler, 2023. "Generic strategic profiling of entrepreneurial SMEs – environmentalism as hygiene factor," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 121-150, March.
    12. Jason R. V. Franken & Michael L. Cook, 2019. "Do Corporate Governance Recommendations Apply to U.S. Agricultural Cooperatives?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-16, September.
    13. Holland, Steven Jerry, 2004. "Investment in a Thin and Uncertain Market: A Dynamic Study of the Formation and Stability of New Generation Cooperatives," Faculty and Alumni Dissertations 307221, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    14. Franken, Jason & Cook, Michael L., 2022. "Cooperatives’ Role in Farm Risk Management," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322116, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Zhang, Yimeng & Ma, Xinyu & Pang, Jianing & Xing, Hailong & Wang, Jian, 2023. "The impact of digital transformation of manufacturing on corporate performance — The mediating effect of business model innovation and the moderating effect of innovation capability," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Li, Ziran & Hang, Qian, 2014. "Pricing under Uncertainty in Agricultural Grain Markets and the Objectives of Cooperatives: A Mixed Oligopoly Analysis," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 170206, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Yu, L. & Huang, W., 2018. "Non-economic societal impact or economic revenue? Performance and efficiency analysis of farmer cooperatives in China," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277512, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    18. Ortmann, Gerald F. & King, Robert P., 2007. "Agricultural Cooperatives I: History, Theory and Problems," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 46(1), pages 1-29, March.
    19. Vladislav Valentinov & Constantine Iliopoulos, 2021. "Social capital in cooperatives: an evolutionary Luhmannian perspective," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 1317-1331, September.
    20. Antonello Cammarano & Vincenzo Varriale & Francesca Michelino & Mauro Caputo, 2023. "Blockchain as enabling factor for implementing RFID and IoT technologies in VMI: a simulation on the Parmigiano Reggiano supply chain," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 726-754, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:10:p:5543-:d:555553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.