IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i3p928-d205054.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Consumer Acceptance of Smart Product-Service Systems in Sharing Economy: The Effects of Perceived Interactivity and Particularity

Author

Listed:
  • Dong Lu

    (School of Business, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610101, China)

  • Ivan Ka Wai Lai

    (Faculty of International Tourism and Management, City University of Macau, Macau 999078, China)

  • Yide Liu

    (School of Business, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau 999078, China)

Abstract

With the rapid growth of the sharing economy, access-based services have emerged as an alternative and/or complementary to traditional ownership-based services. The access-based services are enabled by means of Smart Product-Service Systems (SPSSs) that integrate smart products and e-services into a single solution. However, there is a lack of studies that cover the acceptance factors for both smart products and e-services of SPSSs. Therefore, it is important to have a study to explore the factors that influence the acceptance of SPSSs. This study develops a conceptual framework which consists of the perceived interactivity of mobile apps and the particularity of the smart shared products as antecedents apart from perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, as suggested by the Technology Acceptance Model. To test the research framework empirically, a self-reported online survey was conducted among bike sharing program users in China. A total of 520 valid responses were collected, and the partial least-square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) technique was used to examine the research model. The empirical results suggest that the perceived interactivity of mobile apps and the particularity of smart shared products are two significant sets of antecedents that influence consumers’ perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, and the perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness are preconditions for the acceptance of SPSSs. The findings generate practical suggestions for SPSSs providers to increase the network size of users, improve the interactivity of mobile apps, and manage the distributions of service points.

Suggested Citation

  • Dong Lu & Ivan Ka Wai Lai & Yide Liu, 2019. "The Consumer Acceptance of Smart Product-Service Systems in Sharing Economy: The Effects of Perceived Interactivity and Particularity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:928-:d:205054
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/928/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/3/928/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mont, Oksana, 2004. "Institutionalisation of sustainable consumption patterns based on shared use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(1-2), pages 135-153, September.
    2. Arnold Tukker, 2004. "Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 246-260, July.
    3. Miltiadis D. Lytras & Anna Visvizi, 2018. "Who Uses Smart City Services and What to Make of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    5. Kathan, Wolfgang & Matzler, Kurt & Veider, Viktoria, 2016. "The sharing economy: Your business model's friend or foe?," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 663-672.
    6. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2012. "Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 881-898.
    7. Flora Poppelaars & Conny Bakker & Jo Van Engelen, 2018. "Does Access Trump Ownership? Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Access-Based Consumption in the Case of Smartphones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    9. Fong, Lawrence Hoc Nang & Lam, Long Wai. & Law, Rob, 2017. "How locus of control shapes intention to reuse mobile apps for making hotel reservations: Evidence from chinese consumers," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 331-342.
    10. Elliot Fishman & Simon Washington & Narelle Haworth, 2013. "Bike Share: A Synthesis of the Literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 148-165, March.
    11. Reinartz, Werner & Haenlein, Michael & Henseler, Jörg, 2009. "An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 332-344.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Yu & Tung-Jung Sung, 2023. "A value-based view of the smart PSS adoption: a study of smart kitchen appliances," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 17(2), pages 499-527, June.
    2. Aixia Li & A. Y. M. Atiquil Islam & Xiaoqing Gu, 2021. "Factors Engaging College Students in Online Learning: An Investigation of Learning Stickiness," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    3. Schiopu, Andreea Fortuna & Hornoiu, Remus Ion & Padurean, Ana Mihaela & Nica, Ana-Maria, 2022. "Constrained and virtually traveling? Exploring the effect of travel constraints on intention to use virtual reality in tourism," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    4. Xiaoyi Chen & Sarah Cheah & Ao Shen, 2019. "Empirical Study on Behavioral Intentions of Short-Term Rental Tenants—The Moderating Role of Past Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    5. Meindl, Benjamin & Ayala, Néstor Fabián & Mendonça, Joana & Frank, Alejandro G., 2021. "The four smarts of Industry 4.0: Evolution of ten years of research and future perspectives," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    6. Liang, Jyun-Kai & Eccarius, Timo & Lu, Chung-Cheng, 2019. "Investigating factors that affect the intention to use shared parking: A case study of Taipei City," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 799-812.
    7. Mohammadbashir Sedighi & Hamideh Parsaeiyan & Yashar Araghi, 2021. "An Empirical Study of Intention to Continue Using of Digital Ride-hailing Platforms," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 489-515, November.
    8. Katalin Czakó & Kinga Szabó & Marcell Tóth & Dávid Fekete, 2019. "Differences, Constraints and Key Elements of Providing Local Sharing Economy Services in Different-Sized Cities: A Hungarian Case," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Akbari, Morteza & Foroudi, Pantea & Khodayari, Maryam & Zaman Fashami, Rahime & Shahabaldini parizi, Zahra & Shahriari, Elmira, 2022. "Sharing Your Assets: A Holistic Review of Sharing Economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 604-625.
    10. José Alberto Martínez-González & Eduardo Parra-López & Almudena Barrientos-Báez, 2021. "Young Consumers’ Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    11. Chao Gu & Tingting Huang & Wei Wei & Chun Yang & Jiangjie Chen & Wei Miao & Shuyuan Lin & Hanchu Sun & Jie Sun, 2023. "The Effect of Using Augmented Reality Technology in Takeaway Food Packaging to Improve Young Consumers’ Negative Evaluations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-35, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vivian S. C. Tunn & Ellis A. Van den Hende & Nancy M. P. Bocken & Jan P. L. Schoormans, 2021. "Consumer adoption of access‐based product‐service systems: The influence of duration of use and type of product," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2796-2813, September.
    2. Akbar, Payam & Hoffmann, Stefan, 2020. "Creating value in product service systems through sharing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 495-505.
    3. Juelin Yin & Lixian Qian & Anusorn Singhapakdi, 2018. "Sharing Sustainability: How Values and Ethics Matter in Consumers’ Adoption of Public Bicycle-Sharing Scheme," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(2), pages 313-332, May.
    4. Vivian S. C. Tunn & Richard Fokker & Koen A. Luijkx & Silke A. M. De Jong & Jan P. L. Schoormans, 2019. "Making Ours Mine: Increasing Consumer Acceptance of Access-Based PSS through Temporary Product Customisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Hong, Ji Hyun & Kim, Byung Cho & Park, Kyung Sam, 2019. "Optimal risk management for the sharing economy with stranger danger and service quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 1024-1035.
    6. Roos, Daniel & Hahn, Rüdiger, 2017. "Does shared consumption affect consumers' values, attitudes, and norms? A panel study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 113-123.
    7. Aine Petrulaityte & Fabrizio Ceschin & Eujin Pei & David Harrison, 2020. "Applying Distributed Manufacturing to Product-Service System Design: A Set of Near-Future Scenarios and a Design Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-39, June.
    8. Daniel Borg & Oksana Mont & Heather Schoonover, 2020. "Consumer Acceptance and Value in Use-Oriented Product-Service Systems: Lessons from Swedish Consumer Goods Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    9. Małecka, Agnieszka & Mitręga, Maciej & Mróz-Gorgoń, Barbara & Pfajfar, Gregor, 2022. "Adoption of collaborative consumption as sustainable social innovation: Sociability and novelty seeking perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 163-179.
    10. Philippe Cohard, 2020. "Information Systems Values: A Study of the Intranet in Three French Higher Education Institutions," Post-Print hal-02987225, HAL.
    11. Paolo E. Giordani & Francesco Rullani, 2020. "The Digital Revolution and COVID-19," Working Papers 06, Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    12. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    13. Mäntymäki, Matti & Salo, Jari, 2013. "Purchasing behavior in social virtual worlds: An examination of Habbo Hotel," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 282-290.
    14. Lutz, Christoph & Newlands, Gemma, 2018. "Consumer segmentation within the sharing economy: The case of Airbnb," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 187-196.
    15. Marcus Adam, 2018. "The Role of Human Resource Management (HRM) for the Implementation of Sustainable Product-Service Systems (PSS)—An Analysis of Fashion Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    16. Catherine E. Cherry & Nick F. Pidgeon, 2018. "Why Is Ownership an Issue? Exploring Factors That Determine Public Acceptance of Product-Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    17. Hsu, Sheila Hsuan-Yu & Tsou, Hung-Tai & Chen, Ja-Shen, 2021. "“Yes, we do. Why not use augmented reality?†customer responses to experiential presentations of AR-based applications," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    18. Daniel Roos & Rüdiger Hahn, 2019. "Understanding Collaborative Consumption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior with Value-Based Personal Norms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(3), pages 679-697, September.
    19. Gansser, Oliver Alexander & Reich, Christina Stefanie, 2021. "A new acceptance model for artificial intelligence with extensions to UTAUT2: An empirical study in three segments of application," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    20. Oghuma, Apollos Patricks & Chang, Younghoon & Libaque-Saenz, Christian Fernando & Park, Myeong-Cheol & Rho, Jae Jeung, 2015. "Benefit-confirmation model for post-adoption behavior of mobile instant messaging applications: A comparative analysis of KakaoTalk and Joyn in Korea," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 658-677.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:3:p:928-:d:205054. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.