IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v10y2018i6p1998-d152345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Uses Smart City Services and What to Make of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities Research

Author

Listed:
  • Miltiadis D. Lytras

    (School of Business, Deree College—The American College of Greece, 153-42 Athens, Greece
    Effat College of Engineering, Effat University, P.O. Box 34689, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia)

  • Anna Visvizi

    (School of Business, Deree College—The American College of Greece, 153-42 Athens, Greece
    Effat College of Business, Effat University, P.O. Box 34689, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

As research on smart cities garners increased attention and its status consolidates as one of the fanciest areas of research today, this paper makes a case for a cautious rethink of the very rationale and relevance of the debate. To this end, this paper looks at the smart cities debate from the perspectives of, on the one hand, citizens’ awareness of applications and solutions that are considered ‘smart’ and, on the other hand, their ability to use these applications and solutions. Drawing from a detailed analysis of the outcomes of a pilot international study, this paper showcases that even the most educated users of smart city services, i.e., those arguably most aware of and equipped with skills to use these services effectively, express very serious concerns regarding the utility, safety, accessibility and efficiency of those services. This suggests that more pragmatism needs to be included in smart cities research if its findings are to remain useful and relevant for all stakeholders involved. The discussion in this paper contributes to the smart cities debate in three ways. First, it adds empirical support to the thesis of ‘normative bias’ of smart cities research. Second, it suggests ways of bypassing it, thereby opening a debate on the preconditions of sustainable interdisciplinary smart cities research. Third, it points to new avenues of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Miltiadis D. Lytras & Anna Visvizi, 2018. "Who Uses Smart City Services and What to Make of It: Toward Interdisciplinary Smart Cities Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1998-:d:152345
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1998/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/6/1998/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bi, Sheng & Liu, Zhiying & Usman, Khalid, 2017. "The influence of online information on investing decisions of reward-based crowdfunding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 10-18.
    2. Shiann Ming Wu & Tsung-chun Chen & Yenchun Jim Wu & Miltiadis Lytras, 2018. "Smart Cities in Taiwan: A Perspective on Big Data Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, January.
    3. Miltiadis D. Lytras & Vijay Raghavan & Ernesto Damiani, 2017. "Big Data and Data Analytics Research: From Metaphors to Value Space for Collective Wisdom in Human Decision Making and Smart Machines," International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-10, January.
    4. Kwok Tai Chui & Wadee Alhalabi & Sally Shuk Han Pang & Patricia Ordóñez de Pablos & Ryan Wen Liu & Mingbo Zhao, 2017. "Disease Diagnosis in Smart Healthcare: Innovation, Technologies and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    5. José Luis Carrasco-Sáez & Marcelo Careaga Butter & María Graciela Badilla-Quintana, 2017. "The New Pyramid of Needs for the Digital Citizen: A Transition towards Smart Human Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Lihuan Guo & Dongqiang Guo & Wei Wang & Hongwei Wang & Yenchun Jim Wu, 2018. "Distance Diffusion of Home Bias for Crowdfunding Campaigns between Categories: Insights from Data Analytics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anna Visvizi & Miltiadis D. Lytras, 2018. "It’s Not a Fad: Smart Cities and Smart Villages Research in European and Global Contexts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-10, August.
    2. Miltiadis D. Lytras & Anna Visvizi & Akila Sarirete, 2019. "Clustering Smart City Services: Perceptions, Expectations, Responses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Miltiades D. Lytras & Anna Visvizi, 2019. "Big Data and Their Social Impact: Preliminary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    4. Michela Arnaboldi, 2018. "The Missing Variable in Big Data for Social Sciences: The Decision-Maker," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Lihuan Guo & Dongqiang Guo & Wei Wang & Hongwei Wang & Yenchun Jim Wu, 2018. "Distance Diffusion of Home Bias for Crowdfunding Campaigns between Categories: Insights from Data Analytics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Wang, Wei & Guo, Lihuan & Wu, Yenchun Jim, 2022. "The merits of a sentiment analysis of antecedent comments for the prediction of online fundraising outcomes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    7. Xiaobei Liang & Xiaojuan Hu & Jiang Jiang, 2020. "Research on the Effects of Information Description on Crowdfunding Success within a Sustainable Economy—The Perspective of Information Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-36, January.
    8. Junjuan Du, 2023. "Impact of project information disclosure on backers' investment intensity in reward-based crowdfunding: Evidence from agri-food crowdfunding in China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 69(11), pages 427-435.
    9. Lihuan Guo & Wei Wang & Yenchun Jim Wu & Mark Goh, 2021. "How much do social connections matter in fundraising outcomes?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Han-Chiang Ho & Candy Lim Chiu & Somkiat Mansumitrchai & Zhengqing Yuan & Nan Zhao & Jiajie Zou, 2021. "The Influence of Signals on Donation Crowdfunding Campaign Success during COVID-19 Crisis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-25, July.
    11. Munan Li, 2019. "Visualizing the studies on smart cities in the past two decades: a two-dimensional perspective," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 120(2), pages 683-705, August.
    12. Yang, Jialiang & Li, Yaokuang & Calic, Goran & Shevchenko, Anton, 2020. "How multimedia shape crowdfunding outcomes: The overshadowing effect of images and videos on text in campaign information," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 6-18.
    13. Jascha-Alexander Koch & Michael Siering, 2019. "The recipe of successful crowdfunding campaigns," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 661-679, December.
    14. Diandian Xiang & Leinan Zhang & Qiuyan Tao & Yonggui Wang & Shuang Ma, 2019. "Informational or emotional appeals in crowdfunding message strategy: an empirical investigation of backers’ support decisions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 1046-1063, November.
    15. Yanfang Zhang & Mushang Lee, 2019. "A Hybrid Model for Addressing the Relationship between Financial Performance and Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    16. Bhukya, Ramulu & Paul, Justin, 2023. "Social influence research in consumer behavior: What we learned and what we need to learn? – A hybrid systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    17. Jie Gao & Xinping Huang & Lili Zhang, 2019. "Comparative Analysis between International Research Hotspots and National-Level Policy Keywords on Artificial Intelligence in China from 2009 to 2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-18, November.
    18. Kromidha, Endrit & Li, Matthew C., 2019. "Determinants of leadership in online social trading: A signaling theory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 184-197.
    19. Fang, Xing, 2022. "Why we hide good deeds? The selfless and anonymous donation behavior in crowdfunding," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    20. Swati Gupta & Sahil Raj & Sanjay Gupta & Ajay Sharma, 2023. "Prioritising crowdfunding benefits: a fuzzy-AHP approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 379-403, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:10:y:2018:i:6:p:1998-:d:152345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.