IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i1p274-d195613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Making Ours Mine: Increasing Consumer Acceptance of Access-Based PSS through Temporary Product Customisation

Author

Listed:
  • Vivian S. C. Tunn

    (Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Richard Fokker

    (Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Koen A. Luijkx

    (Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Silke A. M. De Jong

    (Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Jan P. L. Schoormans

    (Delft University of Technology, Landbergstraat 15, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Access-based product-service systems (AB-PSS) have the potential to lower environmental impacts. Currently, a lack of consumer acceptance and, consequently, low adoption levels of AB-PSS are challenges preventing the realisation of their sustainability potential. This study proposes temporary product customisation to lower barriers for the acceptance of AB-PSS. We investigated whether customisation through modifying the appearance of an easily changeable attribute of a typical product, and thereby changing the product personality, could improve consumer acceptance while limiting the impact on sustainability. To explore this, a 3 × 1 between-group design experiment was conducted with consumers who are familiar with offerings similar to the AB-PSS we tested. The results indicate that respondents have a strong preference, as is widely recognised, for typical products in an AB-PSS. Infusing meaning and intangible value into accessed products through customisation can simultaneously lead to wider acceptance in the market and individual consumers’ satisfaction. Our findings confirm that consumer acceptance increases if a product fulfils intangible needs along with functionality needs. The results can be used to think about new ways in which product design can enhance the diffusion of AB-PSS in the consumer market.

Suggested Citation

  • Vivian S. C. Tunn & Richard Fokker & Koen A. Luijkx & Silke A. M. De Jong & Jan P. L. Schoormans, 2019. "Making Ours Mine: Increasing Consumer Acceptance of Access-Based PSS through Temporary Product Customisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:274-:d:195613
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/274/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/1/274/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Loken, Barbara & Ward, James C, 1990. "Alternative Approaches to Understanding the Determinants of Typicality," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 17(2), pages 111-126, September.
    2. Arnold Tukker, 2004. "Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 246-260, July.
    3. Maurizio Catulli & Matthew Cook & Stephen Potter, 2017. "Product Service Systems Users and Harley Davidson Riders: The Importance of Consumer Identity in the Diffusion of Sustainable Consumption Solutions," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(5), pages 1370-1379, October.
    4. Da Silveira, Giovani & Borenstein, Denis & Fogliatto, Flavio S., 2001. "Mass customization: Literature review and research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 1-13, June.
    5. Fleura Bardhi & Giana M. Eckhardt, 2012. "Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(4), pages 881-898.
    6. Catherine E. Cherry & Nick F. Pidgeon, 2018. "Why Is Ownership an Issue? Exploring Factors That Determine Public Acceptance of Product-Service Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    7. Flora Poppelaars & Conny Bakker & Jo Van Engelen, 2018. "Does Access Trump Ownership? Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Access-Based Consumption in the Case of Smartphones," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-18, June.
    8. Weston Baxter & Marco Aurisicchio & Peter Childs, 2017. "Contaminated Interaction: Another Barrier to Circular Material Flows," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(3), pages 507-516, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stephanie Lang & Giulia Minnucci & Matthias Mueller & Michael P. Schlaile, 2023. "The Role of Consumers in Business Model Innovations for a Sustainable Circular Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Daniel Borg & Oksana Mont & Heather Schoonover, 2020. "Consumer Acceptance and Value in Use-Oriented Product-Service Systems: Lessons from Swedish Consumer Goods Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Kee Ok Kim & Hyesun Hwang, 2021. "Consumer acceptance of product–service systems as alternative satisfiers of consumer needs for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 847-859, September.
    4. Paul Rogers, 2021. "Rented But MINE! Application of Psychological Ownership Theory to Access-Based Consumption and the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vivian S. C. Tunn & Ellis A. Van den Hende & Nancy M. P. Bocken & Jan P. L. Schoormans, 2021. "Consumer adoption of access‐based product‐service systems: The influence of duration of use and type of product," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2796-2813, September.
    2. Steven Day & Janet Godsell & Donato Masi & Wanrong Zhang, 2020. "Predicting consumer adoption of branded subscription services: A prospect theory perspective," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1310-1330, March.
    3. Daniel Borg & Oksana Mont & Heather Schoonover, 2020. "Consumer Acceptance and Value in Use-Oriented Product-Service Systems: Lessons from Swedish Consumer Goods Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Paul Rogers, 2021. "Rented But MINE! Application of Psychological Ownership Theory to Access-Based Consumption and the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability,, Springer.
    5. Ece G. Gülserliler & Joseph D. Blackburn & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2022. "Consumer acceptance of circular business models and potential effects on economic performance: The case of washing machines," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(2), pages 509-521, April.
    6. Dong Lu & Ivan Ka Wai Lai & Yide Liu, 2019. "The Consumer Acceptance of Smart Product-Service Systems in Sharing Economy: The Effects of Perceived Interactivity and Particularity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, February.
    7. Lucy Chamberlin & Casper Boks, 2018. "Marketing Approaches for a Circular Economy: Using Design Frameworks to Interpret Online Communications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, June.
    8. Juana Camacho-Otero & Casper Boks & Ida Nilstad Pettersen, 2018. "Consumption in the Circular Economy: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.
    9. Aine Petrulaityte & Fabrizio Ceschin & Eujin Pei & David Harrison, 2020. "Applying Distributed Manufacturing to Product-Service System Design: A Set of Near-Future Scenarios and a Design Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-39, June.
    10. Rönnberg Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2016. "Capability configurations for advanced service offerings in manufacturing firms: Using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 5330-5335.
    11. Ben Bridgens & Kersty Hobson & Debra Lilley & Jacquetta Lee & Janet L. Scott & Garrath T. Wilson, 2019. "Closing the Loop on E‐waste: A Multidisciplinary Perspective," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 169-181, February.
    12. Florian Lüdeke‐Freund & Stefan Gold & Nancy M. P. Bocken, 2019. "A Review and Typology of Circular Economy Business Model Patterns," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 23(1), pages 36-61, February.
    13. Erik G. Hansen & Ferdinand Revellio, 2020. "Circular value creation architectures: Make, ally, buy, or laissez‐faire," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 24(6), pages 1250-1273, December.
    14. Ruth Mugge, 2018. "Product Design and Consumer Behaviour in a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-4, October.
    15. Belezas, Fernando & Daniel, Ana Dias, 2023. "Innovation in the sharing economy: A systematic literature review and research framework," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 122(C).
    16. Till Blüher & Theresa Riedelsheimer & Sonika Gogineni & Antje Klemichen & Rainer Stark, 2020. "Systematic Literature Review—Effects of PSS on Sustainability Based on Use Case Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-26, August.
    17. Leonardo M. Raimundo & João F. Proença, 2023. "The Influence of Sustainability on Psychological Ownership in Services Based on Temporary Access," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-35, July.
    18. Sarunnoud Phuphisith & Kiyo Kurisu, 2022. "Understanding the Determinants and Motivations for Collaborative Consumption in Laundromats," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-20, September.
    19. Daniel Guzzo & Adriana Hofmann Trevisan & Marcia Echeveste & Janaina Mascarenhas Hornos Costa, 2019. "Circular Innovation Framework: Verifying Conceptual to Practical Decisions in Sustainability-Oriented Product-Service System Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29, June.
    20. Carlos Galera-Zarco & José Antonio Campos, 2021. "Exploring Servitization in Industrial Construction: A Sustainable Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:274-:d:195613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.