IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v29y2021i5p847-859.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer acceptance of product–service systems as alternative satisfiers of consumer needs for sustainable development

Author

Listed:
  • Kee Ok Kim
  • Hyesun Hwang

Abstract

As an alternative method of production and consumption in the pursuit of a sustainable society, product–service system (PSS) involves consumers in the process of value creation. This study uses an online survey comprising three questionnaires to investigate consumer acceptance of PSSs based on their expectations of the benefits of three types of PSS: product‐, use‐, and result‐oriented. The results indicate that consumers have higher expectations of the process benefits of result‐oriented PSSs and outcome benefits of product‐oriented PSSs. Furthermore, the results of general linear models indicate that consumers' intentions to purchase PSSs are influenced by expected benefits and consumer innovativeness. High levels of innovativeness among consumers moderate the effects of consumer expectations of outcome benefits on purchase intentions. This result implies that consumers who have lower levels of innovativeness exhibit reluctance to adopt PSSs, although they realize the benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Kee Ok Kim & Hyesun Hwang, 2021. "Consumer acceptance of product–service systems as alternative satisfiers of consumer needs for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 847-859, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:29:y:2021:i:5:p:847-859
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2179
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vandermerwe, Sandra & Rada, Juan, 1988. "Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 314-324, December.
    2. Pauline Deutz & Gareth Neighbour & Michael McGuire, 2010. "Integrating sustainable waste management into product design: sustainability as a functional requirement," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(4), pages 229-239.
    3. Arnold Tukker, 2004. "Eight types of product–service system: eight ways to sustainability? Experiences from SusProNet," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(4), pages 246-260, July.
    4. Kleijnen, Mirella & Lee, Nick & Wetzels, Martin, 2009. "An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 344-357, June.
    5. Cosette M. Armstrong & Kirsi Niinimäki & Chunmin Lang & Sari Kujala, 2016. "A Use‐Oriented Clothing Economy? Preliminary Affirmation for Sustainable Clothing Consumption Alternatives," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(1), pages 18-31, January.
    6. Taillard, Marie & Peters, Linda D. & Pels, Jaqueline & Mele, Cristina, 2016. "The role of shared intentions in the emergence of service ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2972-2980.
    7. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2019. "The circular economy's closed loop and product service systems for sustainable development: A review and appraisal," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 530-536, May.
    8. Herman I. Stål & Johan Jansson, 2017. "Sustainable Consumption and Value Propositions: Exploring Product–Service System Practices Among Swedish Fashion Firms," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(6), pages 546-558, November.
    9. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1980. "Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 7(3), pages 283-295, December.
    10. Laukkanen, Tommi, 2016. "Consumer adoption versus rejection decisions in seemingly similar service innovations: The case of the Internet and mobile banking," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 2432-2439.
    11. Vivian S. C. Tunn & Richard Fokker & Koen A. Luijkx & Silke A. M. De Jong & Jan P. L. Schoormans, 2019. "Making Ours Mine: Increasing Consumer Acceptance of Access-Based PSS through Temporary Product Customisation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rambabu Lavuri & Abhinav Jindal & Umair Akram & Bhukya Koteswara Rao Naik & Alrence Santiago Halibas, 2023. "Exploring the antecedents of sustainable consumers' purchase intentions: Evidence from emerging countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 280-291, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mahavarpour, Nasrin & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea, 2023. "A Brief History of Service Innovation: The evolution of past, present, and future of service innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    2. Siri Jagstedt & Magnus Persson, 2019. "Using Platform Strategies In The Development Of Integrated Product-Service Solutions," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(04), pages 1-36, May.
    3. Nel, Jacques & Boshoff, Christo, 2021. "“I just don't like digital-only banks, and you should not use them either†: Traditional-bank customers' opposition to using digital-only banks," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Arghya Ray & Muskan Jain & Lan Ma & Khalid Hussain Alhamzi & Ananya Ray & Long She, 2024. "The impact of personality traits, barriers and gamification on Gen X continuance intention for mobile credit bill payment apps," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 1154-1174, September.
    5. Bernhard Dachs & Sabine Biege & Martin Borowiecki & Gunter Lay & Angela Jäger & Doris Schartinger, 2014. "Servitisation of European manufacturing: evidence from a large scale database," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 5-23, January.
    6. David Hidalgo-Carvajal & Ruth Carrasco-Gallego & Gustavo Morales-Alonso, 2021. "From Goods to Services and from Linear to Circular: The Role of Servitization’s Challenges and Drivers in the Shifting Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, April.
    7. Julian T. M. Pinto & Manuel E. Morales & Mariia Fedoruk & Marina Kovaleva & Arnaud Diemer, 2019. "Servitization in Support of Sustainable Cities: What Are Steel’s Contributions and Challenges?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, February.
    8. Green, Maxwell H. & Davies, Philip & Ng, Irene C.L., 2017. "Two strands of servitization: A thematic analysis of traditional and customer co-created servitization and future research directions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 40-53.
    9. Vinit Parida & Joakim Wincent, 2019. "Why and how to compete through sustainability: a review and outline of trends influencing firm and network-level transformation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, March.
    10. Pejvak Oghazi & Rana Mostaghel, 2018. "Circular Business Model Challenges and Lessons Learned—An Industrial Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-19, March.
    11. Querci, Ilaria & Monsurrò, Luigi & Peverini, Paolo, 2024. "When anthropomorphism backfires: Anticipation of negative social roles as a source of resistance to smart object adoption," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    12. Karatzas, Antonios & Daskalakis, George & Bastl, Marko & Johnson, Mark, 2022. "Risky business? Shareholder value effects of service provision," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    13. Alina Neamtu Idorasi & Stelian Stancu & Oana Madalina Popescu & Ionut Constantin, 2019. "The customer perspective – an effective and efficient way to differentiate for companies in the globalization era," Manager Journal, Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, vol. 30(1), pages 31-51, December.
    14. Chaouali, Walid & Souiden, Nizar, 2019. "The role of cognitive age in explaining mobile banking resistance among elderly people," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 342-350.
    15. Mark Anthony Camilleri, 2020. "European environment policy for the circular economy: Implications for business and industry stakeholders," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 1804-1812, November.
    16. Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Services, service innovation and the ecological challenge," Chapters, in: Faïz Gallouj & Faridah Djellal (ed.), A Research Agenda for Service Innovation, chapter 2, pages 27-45, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    17. Heidenreich, Sven & Kraemer, Tobias, 2015. "Passive innovation resistance: The curse of innovation? Investigating consequences for innovative consumer behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 134-151.
    18. André, Francisco J. & Arguedas, Carmen & Rousseau, Sandra, 2024. "Strategic pricing, lifespan choices and environmental implications of peer-to-peer sharing," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    19. Paul Rogers, 2021. "Rented But MINE! Application of Psychological Ownership Theory to Access-Based Consumption and the Circular Economy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 719-744, September.
    20. Chankook Park, 2022. "Expansion of servitization in the energy sector and its implications," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(4), July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:29:y:2021:i:5:p:847-859. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.