IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2603-d1361579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exploratory Analysis of the Current Status and Potential of Service-Oriented and Data-Driven Business Models within the Sheet Metal Working Sector: Insights from Interview-Based Research in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Jonas Wirth

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    TRUMPF SE + Co. KG, Johann-Maus-Straße 2, 71254 Ditzingen, Germany)

  • Mirko Schneider

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Leon Hanselmann

    (TRUMPF SE + Co. KG, Johann-Maus-Straße 2, 71254 Ditzingen, Germany)

  • Kira Fink

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Stephan Nebauer

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

  • Thomas Bauernhansl

    (Fraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
    Institute of Industrial Manufacturing and Management (IFF), University of Stuttgart, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany)

Abstract

Responding to changing value creation processes in the sheet metal working sector, where the complexity and interchangeability of products challenge traditional differentiation strategies, this exploratory analysis examines the integration of service-oriented and data-driven business models as new paths to ensure competitiveness, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). This study aims to capture the current state and challenges associated with the implementation of these business models in this sector. This research was conducted through semi-structured interviews with SMEs in the industry. The findings indicate that service-oriented and data-driven business models are not yet widely adopted and that manufacturing companies require support in their implementation. Fields of action were identified for the industry. These are “Creating awareness and understanding”, “Recognizing added value”, “Increasing company maturity”, and “Understanding the change process”. Cooperation between science and industry is essential in tackling these fields of action to ensure the successful integration of such business models in manufacturing companies. This paper identifies challenges in the fields of action that companies must address through a structured approach, promoting awareness, recognizing value, improving organizational maturity, and understanding the change process to successfully implement service-oriented and data-driven business models.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonas Wirth & Mirko Schneider & Leon Hanselmann & Kira Fink & Stephan Nebauer & Thomas Bauernhansl, 2024. "An Exploratory Analysis of the Current Status and Potential of Service-Oriented and Data-Driven Business Models within the Sheet Metal Working Sector: Insights from Interview-Based Research in Small a," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2603-:d:1361579
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2603/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2603/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vandermerwe, Sandra & Rada, Juan, 1988. "Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 6(4), pages 314-324, December.
    2. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Baines, Tim, 2017. "Service implementation in manufacturing: An organisational transformation perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C), pages 1-8.
    3. Tonci Grubic & Ian Jennions, 2018. "Remote monitoring technology and servitised strategies – factors characterising the organisational application," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 56(6), pages 2133-2149, March.
    4. Klaus Backhaus & Jörg Becker & Daniel Beverungen & Margarethe Frohs & Ralf Knackstedt & Oliver Müller & Michael Steiner & Matthias Weddeling, 2010. "Vermarktung hybrider Leistungsbündel: Die Anbieterperspektive," Springer Books, in: Vermarktung hybrider Leistungsbündel, chapter 3, pages 29-74, Springer.
    5. Matthias Weddeling & Michael Steiner & Oliver Müller & Ralf Knackstedt & Jörg Becker & Klaus Backhaus & Daniel Beverungen & Margarethe Frohs, 2010. "Vermarktung hybrider Leistungsbündel," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-642-12830-1, September.
    6. Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit & Patel, Pankaj C. & Gebauer, Heiko, 2020. "The relationship between digitalization and servitization: The role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    7. Mahoney, James & Goertz, Gary, 2006. "A Tale of Two Cultures: Contrasting Quantitative and Qualitative Research," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(3), pages 227-249, July.
    8. Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit & Oghazi, Pejvak & Gebauer, Heiko & Baines, Tim, 2019. "Digital servitization business models in ecosystems: A theory of the firm," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 380-392.
    9. Cobben, Dieudonnee & Ooms, Ward & Roijakkers, Nadine & Radziwon, Agnieszka, 2022. "Ecosystem types: A systematic review on boundaries and goals," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 138-164.
    10. Münch, Christopher & Marx, Emanuel & Benz, Lukas & Hartmann, Evi & Matzner, Martin, 2022. "Capabilities of digital servitization: Evidence from the socio-technical systems theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Sklyar, Alexey & Kowalkowski, Christian & Tronvoll, Bård & Sörhammar, David, 2019. "Organizing for digital servitization: A service ecosystem perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 450-460.
    12. Klaus Backhaus & Jörg Becker & Daniel Beverungen & Margarethe Frohs & Ralf Knackstedt & Oliver Müller & Michael Steiner & Matthias Weddeling, 2010. "Vermarktung hybrider Leistungsbündel: Die Nachfragerperspektive," Springer Books, in: Vermarktung hybrider Leistungsbündel, chapter 4, pages 75-162, Springer.
    13. Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko & Wincent, Joakim, 2020. "An agile co-creation process for digital servitization: A micro-service innovation approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 478-491.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Lei & Sun, Wanqin & Parida, Vinit, 2023. "Consolidating digital servitization research: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    2. Mosch, Philipp & Schweikl, Stefan & Obermaier, Robert, 2021. "Trapped in the supply chain? Digital servitization strategies and power relations in the case of an industrial technology supplier," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    3. Tian, Jiamian & Coreynen, Wim & Matthyssens, Paul & Shen, Lei, 2022. "Platform-based servitization and business model adaptation by established manufacturers," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    4. Huikkola, Tuomas & Kohtamäki, Marko & Rabetino, Rodrigo & Makkonen, Hannu & Holtkamp, Philipp, 2022. "Overcoming the challenges of smart solution development: Co-alignment of processes, routines, and practices to manage product, service, and software integration," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Serena Galvani & Elisa Carloni & Roberta Bocconcelli & Alessandro Pagano, 2022. "From After-Sales to Advanced Services: A Network Analysis on the Impacts of Digital Servitization Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Kohtamäki, Marko & Rabetino, Rodrigo & Einola, Suvi & Parida, Vinit & Patel, Pankaj, 2021. "Unfolding the digital servitization path from products to product-service-software systems: Practicing change through intentional narratives," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 379-392.
    7. Kohtamäki, Marko & Parida, Vinit & Patel, Pankaj C. & Gebauer, Heiko, 2020. "The relationship between digitalization and servitization: The role of servitization in capturing the financial potential of digitalization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    8. Jifei Xie & Lulu Ma & Jiamin Li, 2023. "Servitization, Digitalization or Hand in Hand: A Study on the Sustainable Development Path of Manufacturing Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-17, July.
    9. Linus Thomson & Anmar Kamalaldin & David Sjödin & Vinit Parida, 2022. "A maturity framework for autonomous solutions in manufacturing firms: The interplay of technology, ecosystem, and business model," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 125-152, March.
    10. Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco & Tarba, Shlomo, 2022. "Exploring the interplay between Smart Manufacturing and KIBS firms in configuring product-service innovation performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    11. Zhou, Dan & Yan, Tingting & Dai, Weiqi & Feng, Junzheng, 2021. "Disentangling the interactions within and between servitization and digitalization strategies: A service-dominant logic," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    12. Shleha, Waleed & Vaillant, Yancy & Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran, 2023. "Entry mode diversity and closing commercial deals with international customers: The moderating role of advanced servitization," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 32(1).
    13. Yong Chen & Zhengjie Wu & Wenchao Yi & Bingjia Wang & Jianhua Yao & Zhi Pei & Jiaoliao Chen, 2022. "Bibliometric Method for Manufacturing Servitization: A Review and Future Research Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Chen, Liping & Dai, Yishu & Ren, Fei & Dong, Xiaoying, 2023. "Data-driven digital capabilities enable servitization strategy——From service supporting the product to service supporting the client," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Khanra, Sayantan & Dhir, Amandeep & Parida, Vinit & Kohtamäki, Marko, 2021. "Servitization research: A review and bibliometric analysis of past achievements and future promises," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 151-166.
    16. Jovanovic, Marin & Sjödin, David & Parida, Vinit, 2022. "Co-evolution of platform architecture, platform services, and platform governance: Expanding the platform value of industrial digital platforms," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    17. Wim Coreynen & Arjen van Witteloostuijn & Johanna Vanderstraeten, 2021. "Toward Servitized Research: An Integrated Approach for Sustainable Product-Service Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-21, July.
    18. Kolagar, Milad & Parida, Vinit & Sjödin, David, 2022. "Ecosystem transformation for digital servitization: A systematic review, integrative framework, and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 176-200.
    19. Chirumalla, Koteshwar & Leoni, Luna & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2023. "Moving from servitization to digital servitization: Identifying the required dynamic capabilities and related microfoundations to facilitate the transition," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    20. David Hidalgo-Carvajal & Ruth Carrasco-Gallego & Gustavo Morales-Alonso, 2021. "From Goods to Services and from Linear to Circular: The Role of Servitization’s Challenges and Drivers in the Shifting Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2603-:d:1361579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.