IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i2p335-d1051045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Using Augmented Reality Technology in Takeaway Food Packaging to Improve Young Consumers’ Negative Evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Gu

    (Department of Culture and Arts Management, Honam University, Gwangju 62399, Republic of Korea)

  • Tingting Huang

    (School of Art and Design, Minnan Science and Technology University, Quanzhou 362300, China)

  • Wei Wei

    (School of Textile Garment and Design, Changshu Institute of Technology, Changshu 215500, China)

  • Chun Yang

    (School of Design, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Jiangjie Chen

    (School of Design, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Wei Miao

    (School of Textile Garment and Design, Changshu Institute of Technology, Changshu 215500, China)

  • Shuyuan Lin

    (Department of Media Design, Tatung University, Taipei 104, Taiwan)

  • Hanchu Sun

    (The Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CE Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Jie Sun

    (College of Arts and Design, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

Abstract

This paper examines the use of augmented reality technology in the design of packaging for takeaway food to assist in marketing. The research is divided into three studies for progressive investigation and analysis. Study 1 collected 375,859 negative evaluations of food delivery from the Internet and explored the main reasons that may have impacted the user’s evaluation by Latent Dirichlet Allocation topic modeling. Study 2 evaluated the effectiveness of augmented reality packaging by surveying 165 subjects and comparing it with traditional packaging. We conducted a survey of 1603 subjects in Study 3 and used the technology incentive model (TIM) to analyze how augmented reality technology positively impacts food delivery marketing. It has been established that packaging will influence the negative perception of consumers about buying and eating takeout food. Specifically, augmented reality technology can improve negative evaluations by providing a more conducive user experience than traditional packaging. According to our findings, augmented reality technology has improved the consumers’ perception of interaction, perceived vividness, and novelty experience, and achieved the aim of promoting takeaway food retail by improving negative evaluations posted by users.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Gu & Tingting Huang & Wei Wei & Chun Yang & Jiangjie Chen & Wei Miao & Shuyuan Lin & Hanchu Sun & Jie Sun, 2023. "The Effect of Using Augmented Reality Technology in Takeaway Food Packaging to Improve Young Consumers’ Negative Evaluations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-35, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:335-:d:1051045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/335/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/2/335/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shi, Yishao & Tao, Tianhui & Cao, Xiangyang & Pei, Xiaowen, 2021. "The association between spatial attributes and neighborhood characteristics based on Meituan take-out data: Evidence from shanghai business circles," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    2. Massoud Moslehpour & Van Kien Pham & Wing-Keung Wong & İsmail Bilgiçli, 2018. "e-Purchase Intention of Taiwanese Consumers: Sustainable Mediation of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Sujin Bae & Timothy Hyungsoo Jung & Natasha Moorhouse & Minjeong Suh & Ohbyung Kwon, 2020. "The Influence of Mixed Reality on Satisfaction and Brand Loyalty in Cultural Heritage Attractions: A Brand Equity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-22, April.
    4. Bowon Suh & Shinyoung Kang & Hyeyoung Moon, 2022. "Estimating the Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Customers’ Dining-Out Activities in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Aiyun Xiao & Shaohua Yang & Qaisar Iqbal, 2018. "Factors Affecting Purchase Intentions in Generation Y: An Empirical Evidence from Fast Food Industry in Malaysia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Mandler, Timo & Johnen, Marius & Gräve, Jan-Frederik, 2020. "Can’t help falling in love? How brand luxury generates positive consumer affect in social media," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 330-342.
    7. Whang, Jeong Bin & Song, Ji Hee & Choi, Boreum & Lee, Jong-Ho, 2021. "The effect of Augmented Reality on purchase intention of beauty products: The roles of consumers’ control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 275-284.
    8. El-Adly, Mohammed Ismail, 2019. "Modelling the relationship between hotel perceived value, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 322-332.
    9. Milica Jevremović & Cătălin Gheorghiță & Vladimir Cerić & Ovidiu Blăjină & Zorica Jelić & Milena P. Ilić & Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Țoniș, 2022. "An Empirical Study on Website Interactivity Impact among a Student Group, Beneficent for Companies, and Other Users," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    10. Muhammad Tanveer & Abdul-Rahim Ahmad & Haider Mahmood & Ikram Ul Haq, 2021. "Role of Ethical Marketing in Driving Consumer Brand Relationships and Brand Loyalty: A Sustainable Marketing Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    11. Togawa, Taku & Park, Jaewoo & Ishii, Hiroaki & Deng, Xiaoyan, 2019. "A Packaging Visual-Gustatory Correspondence Effect: Using Visual Packaging Design to Influence Flavor Perception and Healthy Eating Decisions," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 95(4), pages 204-218.
    12. El-Adly, Mohammed Ismail & Eid, Riyad, 2016. "An empirical study of the relationship between shopping environment, customer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty in the UAE malls context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 217-227.
    13. Chun Yang & Xuqi Chen & Jie Sun & Wei Wei & Wei Miao & Chao Gu, 2022. "Could Surplus Food in Blind Box Form Increase Consumers’ Purchase Intention?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-19, June.
    14. Xiaolin Lin & Mauricio Featherman & Stoney L. Brooks & Nick Hajli, 2019. "Exploring Gender Differences in Online Consumer Purchase Decision Making: An Online Product Presentation Perspective," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 1187-1201, October.
    15. Alantari, Huwail J. & Currim, Imran S. & Deng, Yiting & Singh, Sameer, 2022. "An empirical comparison of machine learning methods for text-based sentiment analysis of online consumer reviews," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 1-19.
    16. Mitas, Ondrej & Bastiaansen, Marcel, 2018. "Novelty: A mechanism of tourists’ enjoyment," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 98-108.
    17. Iana A. Castro & Anuja Majmundar & Christine B. Williams & Barbara Baquero, 2018. "Customer Purchase Intentions and Choice in Food Retail Environments: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, November.
    18. Tao Zhang & Junyu Chen & Baoliang Hu, 2019. "Authenticity, Quality, and Loyalty: Local Food and Sustainable Tourism Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Carroll, Raymond J. & Schneider, Helmut, 1985. "A note on levene's tests for equality of variances," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 191-194, July.
    20. Chung, Minjee & Ko, Eunju & Joung, Heerim & Kim, Sang Jin, 2020. "Chatbot e-service and customer satisfaction regarding luxury brands," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 587-595.
    21. Chieh-Peng Lin & Sheng-Wuu Joe, 2012. "To Share or Not to Share: Assessing Knowledge Sharing, Interemployee Helping, and Their Antecedents Among Online Knowledge Workers," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 108(4), pages 439-449, July.
    22. Dong Lu & Ivan Ka Wai Lai & Yide Liu, 2019. "The Consumer Acceptance of Smart Product-Service Systems in Sharing Economy: The Effects of Perceived Interactivity and Particularity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-22, February.
    23. Ewa Kochańska & Rafał M. Łukasik & Maciej Dzikuć, 2021. "New Circular Challenges in the Development of Take-Away Food Packaging in the COVID-19 Period," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-18, August.
    24. Muhammad Tanveer & Harsandaldeep Kaur & George Thomas & Haider Mahmood & Mandakini Paruthi & Zhang Yu, 2021. "Mobile Phone Buying Decisions among Young Adults: An Empirical Study of Influencing Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-18, September.
    25. Fan, Xiaojun & Chai, Zeli & Deng, Nianqi & Dong, Xuebing, 2020. "Adoption of augmented reality in online retailing and consumers’ product attitude: A cognitive perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    26. Ismagilova, Elvira & Slade, Emma & Rana, Nripendra P. & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2020. "The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: A meta-analysis," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    27. Rui Silva & Ricardo Rodrigues & Carmem Leal, 2019. "Play it again: how game-based learning improves flow in Accounting and Marketing education," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(5), pages 484-507, September.
    28. Charlene Li & Miranda Mirosa & Phil Bremer, 2020. "Review of Online Food Delivery Platforms and their Impacts on Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    29. Chen, Yi-Mu & Hsu, Tsuen-Ho & Lu, Yu-Jou, 2018. "Impact of flow on mobile shopping intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 281-287.
    30. Favier, Manon & Celhay, Franck & Pantin-Sohier, Gaëlle, 2019. "Is less more or a bore? Package design simplicity and brand perception: an application to Champagne," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 11-20.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alencar Bravo & Darli Vieira, 2024. "Modelling the Purchase of Green Packaged Products: The Significant Impact of the West–East Cultural Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Kevan W. Lamm & Lauren Pike & Lauren Griffeth & Jiyea Park & Andrews Idun, 2023. "Critical Issues Facing the Agriculture, Forestry, and Natural Resources Industries in the State of Georgia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qin, Hong & Osatuyi, Babajide & Xu, Lu, 2021. "How mobile augmented reality applications affect continuous use and purchase intentions: A cognition-affect-conation perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Baabdullah, Abdullah M. & Alalwan, Ali Abdallah & Algharabat, Raed S. & Metri, Bhimaraya & Rana, Nripendra P., 2022. "Virtual agents and flow experience: An empirical examination of AI-powered chatbots," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    3. Sun, Chunhua & Fang, Yuan & Kong, Meng & Chen, Xiayu & Liu, Yezheng, 2022. "Influence of augmented reality product display on consumers’ product attitudes: A product uncertainty reduction perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Sharma, Amalesh & Soni, Mauli & Borah, Sourav Bikash & Haque, Tanjum, 2022. "From silos to synergies: A systematic review of luxury in marketing research," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 893-907.
    5. Imran Khan & Mobin Fatma, 2023. "Does Perceived Sustainability Affect the Customer Responses toward the Brands? Role of Customer Engagement as a Mediator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Ganesh Dash & Syed Akmal & Prashant Mehta & Debarun Chakraborty, 2022. "COVID-19 and E-Learning Adoption in Higher Education: A Multi-Group Analysis and Recommendation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-20, July.
    7. Pathak, Kanishka & Prakash, Gyan, 2023. "Exploring the role of augmented reality in purchase intention: Through flow and immersive experience," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    8. Yeo, Sook Fern & Tan, Cheng Ling & Teo, Shen Long & Tan, Kim Hua, 2021. "The role of food apps servitization on repurchase intention: A study of FoodPanda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Whang, Jeong-Bin & Song, Ji Hee & Lee, Jong-Ho & Choi, Boreum, 2022. "Interacting with Chatbots: Message type and consumers' control," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 309-318.
    10. Giulia Borghesi & Piergiuseppe Morone, 2023. "A review of the effects of COVID-19 on food waste," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 15(1), pages 261-280, February.
    11. Zhang, Shanqi & Luan, Hui & Zhen, Feng & Kong, Yu & Xi, Guangliang, 2023. "Does online food delivery improve the equity of food accessibility? A case study of Nanjing, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    12. Ogechi Adeola & Isaiah Adisa & Adenike Moradeyo & Oserere Ibelegbu, 2023. "Mall Environment and Mall Value as Antecedents of Customer Loyalty in Shopping Malls: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    13. Chekembayeva, Gaukhar & Garaus, Marion & Schmidt, Orsolya, 2023. "The role of time convenience and (anticipated) emotions in AR mobile retailing application adoption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    14. Patel, Vipul & Das, Kallol & Chatterjee, Ravi & Shukla, Yupal, 2020. "Does the interface quality of mobile shopping apps affect purchase intention? An empirical study," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 300-309.
    15. Jayaswal, Pragya & Parida, Biswajita, 2023. "The role of augmented reality in redefining e-tailing: A review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    16. Dastane, Omkar & Goi, Chai Lee & Rabbanee, Fazlul, 2020. "A synthesis of constructs for modelling consumers’ perception of value from mobile-commerce (M-VAL)," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    17. Carlos Correa & David Alarcón & Ignacio Cepeda, 2021. "“I am Delighted!”: The Effect of Perceived Customer Value on Repurchase and Advocacy Intention in B2B Express Delivery Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Hee-Min Lee & Jee-Won Kang & Young Namkung, 2021. "Instagram Users’ Information Acceptance Process for Food-Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    19. Kumar, Aman & Shankar, Amit & Behl, Abhishek & Arya, Varsha & Gupta, Nakul, 2023. "Should I share it? Factors influencing fake news-sharing behaviour: A behavioural reasoning theory perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    20. Fernandes, Semila & Panda, Rajesh & Venkatesh, V.G. & Swar, Biranchi Narayan & Shi, Yangyan, 2022. "Measuring the impact of online reviews on consumer purchase decisions – A scale development study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:2:p:335-:d:1051045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.