IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jjrfmx/v15y2022i8p366-d889860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors Influencing the Take-Up of Agricultural Insurance and the Entry into the Mutual Fund: A Case Study of the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Sofia Kislingerová

    (Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Mánesova 75, 120 00 Prague 2, Czech Republic)

  • Jindřich Špička

    (Faculty of Business Administration, Prague University of Economics and Business, W. Churchill Sq. 4, 130 67 Prague 3, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The objective of the study was to identify the main factors influencing farmers’ willingness to take up agricultural insurance and participate in a mutual fund for non-insurable risks in the Czech Republic. Responses from 214 representative farms were processed using descriptive statistics, paired t -tests, binary logistic regression, and contingency analysis. The regression model showed the influences of agricultural area, distrust in insurance companies, the probability of losing more than 20% of production, the price of insurance premiums, and having a developed formal strategy on the likelihood of taking up agricultural insurance. Unlike previous empirical studies, this study did not attempt to look at agricultural insurance as an isolated risk management tool but rather to show the interrelationship between farmers’ decisions to join a mutual fund and their choice of agricultural insurance. Farmers expect most agricultural production risks to become significantly more important. With the ongoing economic crisis in the EU, there is growing pressure to reduce ad hoc public spending on coverage of non-insurable risks and to seek alternative solutions. The study also shows the need for a holistic approach to the design of risk management support systems in EU countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Sofia Kislingerová & Jindřich Špička, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Take-Up of Agricultural Insurance and the Entry into the Mutual Fund: A Case Study of the Czech Republic," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-17, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:366-:d:889860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/8/366/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/15/8/366/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hongli Feng & Xiaodong Du & David A. Hennessy, 2020. "Depressed demand for crop insurance contracts, and a rationale based on third generation Prospect Theory," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 51(1), pages 59-73, January.
    2. Šimpach, Ondřej & Pechrová, M., 2015. "Development of the Czech Farmers’ Age Structure and the Consequences for Subsidy Policy," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 7(3), pages 1-13, September.
    3. Anna Zubor-Nemes & József Fogarasi & András Molnár & Gábor Kemény, 2018. "Farmers’ responses to the changes in Hungarian agricultural insurance system," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 78(2), pages 275-288, March.
    4. Essossinam Ali & Aklesso Y. G. Egbendewe & Tahirou Abdoulaye & Daniel B. Sarpong, 2020. "Willingness to pay for weather index-based insurance in semi-subsistence agriculture: evidence from northern Togo," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 534-547, May.
    5. Lajos Baráth & Raushan Bokusheva & Imre Fertő, 2017. "Demand for Farm Insurance Under Financial Constraints," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 357-376, July.
    6. Miranda P.M. Meuwissen & Tsion Taye Assefa & Marcel A.P.M. Asseldonk, 2013. "Supporting Insurance in European Agriculture: Experience of Mutuals in the Netherlands," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 12(3), pages 10-16, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luigi Biagini & Simone Severini, 2022. "Can Machine Learning discover the determining factors in participation in insurance schemes? A comparative analysis," Papers 2212.03092, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2022.
    2. Shirinyan Lada & Arych Mykhailo & Rohanova Hanna, 2021. "Influence of Insurance on Competitiveness of Food Enterprises in Ukraine," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 43(1), pages 5-12, March.
    3. Martey, Edward & Etwire, Prince M. & Adombilla, Ramson & Abebrese, Samuel O., 2023. "Information constraint and farmers’ willingness to pay for an irrigation scheduling tool," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    4. Simone Severini & Cinzia Zinnanti & Valeria Borsellino & Emanuele Schimmenti, 2021. "EU income stabilization tool: potential impacts, financial sustainability and farmer’s risk aversion," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 9(1), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Myyrä, Sami & Liesivaara, Petri, 2014. "Willingness to pay for agricultural yield insurance is affected by starting point bias," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182855, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    6. Giampietri, Elisa & Yu, Xiaohua & Trestini, Samuele, 2020. "The role of trust and perceived barriers on farmer’s intention to adopt risk management tools," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 9(1), April.
    7. Möhring, Niklas & Dalhaus, Tobias & Enjolras, Geoffroy & Finger, Robert, 2020. "Crop insurance and pesticide use in European agriculture," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Kamel Louhichi & Daël Merisier, 2023. "Potential impacts of the Income Stabilisation Tool on farmers' income and crop diversity: a French case study [Impacts potentiels de l'outil de stabilisation des revenus sur les revenus des agricul," Post-Print hal-04195630, HAL.
    9. Luigi Biagini & Simone Severini, 2021. "The role of Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) in enhancing and stabilising farm income: an analysis of income transfer efficiency and the Income Stabilisation Tool," Papers 2104.14188, arXiv.org.
    10. Liesivaara, Petri & Myyrä, Sami, 2017. "The demand for public–private crop insurance and government disaster relief," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 19-34.
    11. Milan Oplanić & Ana Čehić Marić & Smiljana Goreta Ban & Tajana Čop & Mario Njavro, 2022. "Horticultural Farmers’ Perceived Risk of Climate Change in Adriatic Croatia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Paloch Suchato & Taro Mieno & Karina Schoengold & Timothy Foster, 2022. "The potential for moral hazard behavior in irrigation decisions under crop insurance," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(2), pages 257-273, March.
    13. Stigler, Matthieu M. & Lobell, David, 2020. "Suitability of index insurance: new insights from satellite data," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304663, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Ranjan Kumar Ghosh & Shweta Gupta & Vartika Singh & Patrick S. Ward, 2021. "Demand for Crop Insurance in Developing Countries: New Evidence from India," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(1), pages 293-320, February.
    15. Tobias Dalhaus & Barry J Barnett & Robert Finger, 2020. "Behavioral weather insurance: Applying cumulative prospect theory to agricultural insurance design under narrow framing," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, May.
    16. Ruggiero Rippo & Simone Cerroni, 2023. "Farmers' participation in the Income Stabilisation Tool: Evidence from the apple sector in Italy," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(1), pages 273-294, February.
    17. Filiptseva, Anna & Filler, Günther & Odening, Martin, 2022. "Compensation Options for Quarantine Costs in Plant Production," 62nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 7-9, 2022 329595, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    18. Vilhelm, V. & Špička, J. & Valder, A., 2015. "Public Support of Agricultural Risk Management – Situation and Prospects," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 7(2), pages 1-10, June.
    19. Alexis H. Villacis & Jeffrey R. Alwang & Victor Barrera, 2021. "Linking risk preferences and risk perceptions of climate change: A prospect theory approach," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(5), pages 863-877, September.
    20. Jean Cordier & Fabio Santeramo, 2020. "Mutual Funds and the Income Stabilisation Tool in the EU: Retrospect and Prospects," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(1), pages 53-58, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jjrfmx:v:15:y:2022:i:8:p:366-:d:889860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.