IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i14p1527-d1702039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Peer Effects and Rural Households’ Online Shopping Behavior: Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiaxi Zhou

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Guoxiong Zhao

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Liuyang Yao

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

Abstract

Amid the rapid expansion of the digital economy, online shopping has become increasingly common among rural households in China, yet the social interaction mechanisms driving such behavior remain insufficiently explored. This study examines the impact of peer effects on farmers’ online shopping behavior using data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) covering the years 2014 to 2022. A Logit model is applied to estimate peer influence, and interaction terms are introduced to assess the moderating roles of land assets and social expenditures. The results reveal that peer behavior significantly increases the likelihood of rural households participating in online shopping, with the effect being particularly strong among low-income, less-educated households and those in western regions. Additionally, both land-rich households and those with higher social expenditures demonstrate greater responsiveness to peer influence. These findings highlight the importance of local social interaction in shaping rural online shopping behavior and provide theoretical and practical implications for digital inclusion and rural e-commerce strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiaxi Zhou & Guoxiong Zhao & Liuyang Yao, 2025. "Peer Effects and Rural Households’ Online Shopping Behavior: Evidence from China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:14:p:1527-:d:1702039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/14/1527/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/14/1527/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark T. Leary & Michael R. Roberts, 2014. "Do Peer Firms Affect Corporate Financial Policy?," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(1), pages 139-178, February.
    2. Bramoullé, Yann & Djebbari, Habiba & Fortin, Bernard, 2009. "Identification of peer effects through social networks," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 150(1), pages 41-55, May.
    3. Aker, Jenny C. & Ksoll, Christopher, 2016. "Can mobile phones improve agricultural outcomes? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Niger," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 44-51.
    4. Sarah Brown & Pulak Ghosh & Karl Taylor, 2016. "Household Finances and Social Interaction: Bayesian Analysis of Household Panel Data," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 62(3), pages 467-488, September.
    5. Beaman, Lori & Dillon, Andrew, 2018. "Diffusion of agricultural information within social networks: Evidence on gender inequalities from Mali," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 147-161.
    6. Guo, Yuanzhi & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Poverty alleviation through land assetization and its implications for rural revitalization in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    7. Charles F. Manski, 2000. "Economic Analysis of Social Interactions," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 115-136, Summer.
    8. Hongyun Han & Fan Si, 2023. "Capital assets and poverty transitions in rural China," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 15(3), pages 563-579, June.
    9. Joshua D. Angrist & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 2009. "Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 8769.
    10. Xinjie Li & Liu Yang & Qian Lu, 2024. "Does Social Learning Promote Farmers’ Cooperative Pest Control?—Evidence from Northwestern China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, October.
    11. Mingzhi Hu & Guocheng Xiang & Shihu Zhong, 2021. "The Burden of Social Connectedness: Do Escalating Gift Expenditures Make You Happy?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(8), pages 3479-3497, December.
    12. Charles F. Manski, 1993. "Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 60(3), pages 531-542.
    13. Yu Du & Hui Feng & Qingsong Zhang & Shaofeng Zheng, 2025. "Influence of Information Literacy on Farmers’ Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior: The Moderating Role of Risk Attitude," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    14. Ying Cheng & Yuan Hu & Weizhong Zeng & Zhongbao Liu, 2022. "Farmer Heterogeneity and Land Transfer Decisions Based on the Dual Perspectives of Economic Endowment and Land Endowment," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-13, February.
    15. Aschhoff, Birgit & Grimpe, Christoph, 2014. "Contemporaneous peer effects, career age and the industry involvement of academics in biotechnology," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(2), pages 367-381.
    16. Haoyuan Liu & Zhe Chen & Suyue Wen & Jizhou Zhang & Xianli Xia, 2025. "Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmers’ Adoption Behaviors of Green Production Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    17. Yunlong Sui & Qiang Gao, 2023. "Farmers’ Endowments, Technology Perception and Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    18. John R. Graham, 1999. "Herding among Investment Newsletters: Theory and Evidence," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 54(1), pages 237-268, February.
    19. Yongmin Luo & Shenqi Ding & Qiyuan Li & Min Gao, 2024. "Adding insult to injury: Living in a remote location increases the burden of gift expenses among the rural poor in China," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(5), pages 2229-2251, July.
    20. Zhigang Xu & Kerong Zhang & Li Zhou & Ruiyao Ying, 2022. "Mutual proximity and heterogeneity in peer effects of farmers' technology adoption: evidence from China's soil testing and formulated fertilization program," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 395-415, January.
    21. Zhen, Lin & Cao, Shuyan & Cheng, Shengkui & Xie, Gaodi & Wei, Yunjie & Liu, Xuelin & Li, Fen, 2010. "Arable land requirements based on food consumption patterns: Case study in rural Guyuan District, Western China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1443-1453, May.
    22. Cheng, Ying & Hu, Yuan & Zeng, Weizhong & Liu, Zhongbao, 2022. "Farmer heterogeneity and land transfer decisions based on the dual perspectives of economic endowment and land endowment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(3).
    23. Qiu, Tongwei & Zhang, Danru & Choy, S.T. Boris & Luo, Biliang, 2021. "The interaction between informal and formal institutions: A case study of private land property rights in rural China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 578-591.
    24. Wu, Haixia & Li, Jianping & Ge, Yan, 2022. "Ambiguity preference, social learning and adoption of soil testing and formula fertilization technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    25. Stephen Perz, 2005. "The importance of household asset diversity for livelihood diversity and welfare among small farm colonists in the Amazon," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 1193-1220.
    26. Song, Malin & Ma, Xiaowei & Shang, Yuping & Zhao, Xin, 2020. "Influences of land resource assets on economic growth and fluctuation in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    27. Zhigang Xu & Kerong Zhang & Li Zhou & Ruiyao Ying, 2022. "Mutual proximity and heterogeneity in peer effects of farmers' technology adoption: evidence from China's soil testing and formulated fertilization program," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(2), pages 395-415, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Cecilia Bustamante & Laurent Frésard, 2021. "Does Firm Investment Respond to Peers’ Investment?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(8), pages 4703-4724, August.
    2. Gibbons, Steve & Overman, Henry G. & Patacchini, Eleonora, 2015. "Spatial Methods," Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, in: Gilles Duranton & J. V. Henderson & William C. Strange (ed.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, edition 1, volume 5, chapter 0, pages 115-168, Elsevier.
    3. Cave, Joshua & Lancheros, Sandra, 2024. "Local peer influence on dividend payout decisions," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    4. Kelchtermans, Stijn & Neicu, Daniel & Teirlinck, Peter, 2020. "The role of peer effects in firms’ usage of R&D tax exemptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 74-91.
    5. Ali-Rind, Asad & Boubaker, Sabri & Jarjir, Souad Lajili, 2023. "Peer effects in financial economics: A literature survey," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    6. Margaretic, Paula & Cifuentes, Rodrigo & Carreño, José Gabriel, 2021. "Banks’ interconnections and peer effects: Evidence from Chile," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Bet Caeyers, 2014. "Peer effects in development programme awareness of vulnerable groups in rural Tanzania," CSAE Working Paper Series 2014-11, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    8. Yann Algan & Quoc-Anh Do & Nicolò Dalvit & Alexis Le Chapelain & Yves Zenou, 2015. "How Social Networks Shape Our Beliefs: A Natural Experiment among Future French Politicians," Working Papers hal-03459820, HAL.
    9. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/78vacv4udu92eq3fec89svm9uv is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Bonan, Jacopo & Battiston, Pietro & Bleck, Jaimie & LeMay-Boucher, Philippe & Pareglio, Stefano & Sarr, Bassirou & Tavoni, Massimo, 2021. "Social interaction and technology adoption: Experimental evidence from improved cookstoves in Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    11. Lan, Jing & Liu, Zhen, 2019. "Social network effect on income structure of SLCP participants: Evidence from Baitoutan Village, China," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Samuli Knüpfer & Elias Rantapuska & Matti Sarvimäki, 2023. "Social Interaction in the Family: Evidence from Investors’ Security Holdings," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(4), pages 1297-1327.
    13. Ida Johnsson & Hyungsik Roger Moon, 2017. "Estimation of Peer Effects in Endogenous Social Networks: Control Function Approach," Papers 1709.10024, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2019.
    14. Laurent Davezies & Xavier D'Haultfoeuille & Denis Fougère, 2009. "Identification of peer effects using group size variation," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 12(3), pages 397-413, November.
    15. Lorenzo Cappellari & Konstantinos Tatsiramos, 2010. "Friends’ Networks and Job Finding Rates," DISCE - Quaderni dell'Istituto di Economia dell'Impresa e del Lavoro ieil0059, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Dipartimenti e Istituti di Scienze Economiche (DISCE).
    16. Mekonnen Daniel Ayalew & Gerber Nicolas & Matz Julia Anna, 2016. "Working Paper 235 - Social Networks, Agricultural Innovations, and Farm Productivity in Ethiopia," Working Paper Series 2330, African Development Bank.
    17. Hackney, Jeremy & Marchal, Fabrice, 2011. "A coupled multi-agent microsimulation of social interactions and transportation behavior," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(4), pages 296-309, May.
    18. Gioia De Melo, 2011. "Peer effects identified through social networks. Evidence from Uruguayan schools," Department of Economics University of Siena 627, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    19. Ryota Nakamura & Marc Suhrcke & Daniel John Zizzo, 2017. "A triple test for behavioral economics models and public health policy," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 83(4), pages 513-533, December.
    20. Vincent Boucher & Yann Bramoullé, 2020. "Binary Outcomes and Linear Interactions," AMSE Working Papers 2038, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France.
    21. Semih Tumen & Tugba Zeydanli, 2016. "Social interactions in job satisfaction," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 426-455, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:14:p:1527-:d:1702039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.