IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i7p701-d1620868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Information Literacy on Farmers’ Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior: The Moderating Role of Risk Attitude

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Du

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Hui Feng

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Qingsong Zhang

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

  • Shaofeng Zheng

    (College of Economics and Management, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China)

Abstract

Green production technology is a critical component of contemporary agricultural development, playing a pivotal role in the promotion of sustainable agricultural practices. Information literacy is the basic ability for farmers to engage in agricultural production, including information awareness, information knowledge, and information ability. In order to investigate the impact of information literacy on farmers’ green production technology adoption behavior, this paper constructs information literacy indicators using factor analysis, based on survey data from 1316 farming households in Shanxi and Hebei provinces, and empirically analyzed the impact of information literacy on farmers’ green production technology adoption behavior and the moderating effect of risk attitude using the Heckman model and moderating effect model, respectively. The empirical evidence indicates the following: (1) Information literacy can significantly contribute to farmers’ adoption decisions and adoption degree of green production technologies. (2) Information literacy has a significant effect on the adoption decisions of all five green production technologies. (3) The results of the heterogeneity analysis indicate that the coefficient of information literacy on the degree of adoption of green production technologies by farmers with different endowment characteristics varies significantly. The promotion effect is more pronounced for small-scale farmers and farmers with a high share of agricultural income. (4) The interaction term between risk attitude and information literacy has a significant effect on farmers’ green production technology adoption degree. Based on these findings, the paper recommends that relevant institutions focus on enhancing farmers’ information literacy, strengthening the agricultural production guarantee system, and developing differentiated strategies for promoting green production technologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Du & Hui Feng & Qingsong Zhang & Shaofeng Zheng, 2025. "Influence of Information Literacy on Farmers’ Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior: The Moderating Role of Risk Attitude," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:701-:d:1620868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/7/701/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/7/701/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stavros Kalogiannidis & Simeon Karafolas & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2024. "The Key Role of Cooperatives in Sustainable Agriculture and Agrifood Security: Evidence from Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Guo, Zhangdong & Chen, Xiaoqi & Zhang, Yongwang, 2022. "Impact of environmental regulation perception on farmers' agricultural green production technology adoption: A new perspective of social capital," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Zheng Li & Disheng Zhang & Xiaohuan Yan, 2024. "How Does Information Acquisition Ability Affect Farmers’ Green Production Behaviors: Evidence from Chinese Apple Growers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, April.
    4. Yunlong Sui & Qiang Gao, 2023. "Farmers’ Endowments, Technology Perception and Green Production Technology Adoption Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Xu, Dingde & Liu, Yi & Li, Yichao & Liu, Shaoquan & Liu, Guihua, 2024. "Effect of farmland scale on agricultural green production technology adoption: Evidence from rice farmers in Jiangsu Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    6. Qianchun Dai & Kequn Cheng, 2022. "What Drives the Adoption of Agricultural Green Production Technologies? An Extension of TAM in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, November.
    7. Xuezhen Xu & Fang Wang & Tao Xu & Sufyan Ullah Khan, 2023. "How Does Capital Endowment Impact Farmers’ Green Production Behavior? Perspectives on Ecological Cognition and Environmental Regulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-27, August.
    8. Schroeder Ted C. & Tonsor Glynn T. & Pennings Joost M.E. & Mintert James, 2007. "Consumer Food Safety Risk Perceptions and Attitudes: Impacts on Beef Consumption across Countries," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(1), pages 1-29, December.
    9. Mawazo Magesa & Joan Jonathan & Justin Urassa, 2023. "Digital Literacy of Smallholder Farmers in Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, September.
    10. Tianshu Quan & Weiguo Jia & Tianli Quan & Yuyun Xu, 2024. "Impact of Farmers’ Participation in the Transformation of the Farmland Transfer Market on the Adoption of Agricultural Green Production Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haoyuan Liu & Zhe Chen & Suyue Wen & Jizhou Zhang & Xianli Xia, 2025. "Impact of Digital Literacy on Farmers’ Adoption Behaviors of Green Production Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Dalin Zhang & Feng Dong & Zhicheng Li & Sulan Xu, 2025. "How Can Farmers’ Green Production Behavior Be Promoted? A Literature Review of Drivers and Incentives for Behavioral Change," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Jieyu Yang & Xiujuan Cui, 2025. "How Livelihood Capital Affects Farmers’ Green Production Behavior: Analysis of Mediating Effects Based on Farmers’ Cognition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Chengmin Li & Haoyu Deng & Guoxin Yu & Rong Kong & Jian Liu, 2024. "Impact Effects of Cooperative Participation on the Adoption Behavior of Green Production Technologies by Cotton Farmers and the Driving Mechanisms," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-25, January.
    5. Jialan Zhang & Ludan Zhang & Kuan Zhang & Xin Deng, 2025. "Can internet use promote farmers’ diversity in green production technology adoption? Empirical evidence from rural China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Yuanyuan Peng & Jinyong Guo & Yanduo Liu & Lichen Liao & Siwei Jiang & Yonghong Tang, 2025. "Will land transfer improve grain farmers’ adoption of agricultural green production technology? Evidence from Jiangxi Province, China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Yuyang Li & Jiahui Li & Xinjie Li & Qian Lu, 2024. "Does Participation in Digital Supply and Marketing Promote Smallholder Farmers’ Adoption of Green Agricultural Production Technologies?," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, December.
    8. Irz, Xavier & Mazzocchi, Mario & Réquillart, Vincent & Soler, Louis-Georges, 2015. "Research in Food Economics: past trends and new challenges," Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, Editions NecPlus, vol. 96(01), pages 187-237, March.
    9. Songhong Chen & Jian Ming Luo, 2023. "Understand Delegates Risk Attitudes and Behaviour: The Moderating Effect of Trust in COVID-19 Vaccination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Yong Liu & Jixin Yang & Guanghong Zhang & Xufeng Cui, 2024. "Driving factors of green production behaviour among farmers of different scales: Evidence from North China," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(10), pages 474-494.
    11. Pendell, Dustin L. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Dhuyvetter, Kevin C. & Brester, Gary W. & Schroeder, Ted C., 2013. "Evolving beef export market access requirements for age and source verification," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 332-340.
    12. Aaron M. Shew & Heather A. Snell & Rodolfo M. Nayga & Mary C. Lacity, 2022. "Consumer valuation of blockchain traceability for beef in the United States," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 299-323, March.
    13. Anderberg, Dan & Chevalier, Arnaud & Wadsworth, Jonathan, 2011. "Anatomy of a health scare: Education, income and the MMR controversy in the UK," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 515-530, May.
    14. Glynn T. Tonsor & Ted C. Schroeder & Joost M. E. Pennings, 2009. "Factors Impacting Food Safety Risk Perceptions," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 625-644, September.
    15. Francesca Silvia Rota & Luigi Bollani & Maria Giuseppina Lucia & Alessandro Bonadonna, 2024. "Food Quality and Risk Perception: An Empirical Study Based on the Opinion of University Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    16. Lim, Kar Ho & Hu, Wuyang & Maynard, Leigh J. & Goddard, Ellen W., 2012. "Stated Preference and Perception Analysis for Traceable and BSE-tested Beef: An Application of Mixed Error-Component Logit Model," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124784, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Shi Yin & Shuai Han & Yijie Liu & Yilin Wang, 2024. "Impact of new media use on farmers’ willingness to use clean energy: the role of topography and agricultural income," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Mathew, Rintle & Tholath, Deepa Ittimani, 2024. "Antecedents of organic prosumption behaviour: examining the moderating effect of ease of organic prosumption practice," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(2), June.
    19. Violet Muringai & Ellen Goddard, 2018. "Trust and consumer risk perceptions regarding BSE and chronic wasting disease," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(2), pages 240-265, March.
    20. Yuchen Lu & Jiakun Zhuang & Jun Chen & Chenlu Yang & Mei Kong, 2025. "The Impact of Farmland Transfer on Urban–Rural Integration: Causal Inference Based on Double Machine Learning," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:7:p:701-:d:1620868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.