IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i7p3024-d1623081.html

Structural Changes to China’s Agricultural Business Entities System Under the Perspective of Competitive Evolution

Author

Listed:
  • Shenghao Zhu

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Guanyi Yin

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Qingzhi Sun

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Zhan Zhang

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Guanghao Li

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

  • Liangfei Gao

    (College of Geography and Environment, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250358, China)

Abstract

With the development of new agricultural business entities in China, a complex competitive evolutionary dynamic has emerged among diversified agricultural business entities (abbreviated as ABEs), including farmers (traditional ABEs), cooperatives, agricultural enterprises, and family farms (new ABEs). Based on the Lotka–Volterra model, the dominance index, the Shannon–Wiener index of ecological theories, and the geo-detector, this study examines the spatiotemporal evolution and driving factors of ABEs’ structural changes across 286 Chinese cities from 2012 to 2021. Key findings include: (1) Farmers maintain absolute numerical dominance, but their relative advantage has declined. (2) The Shannon–Wiener index of diversified ABEs has increased significantly, indicating that differences between ABEs decreased, which means a trend toward structural homogenization. High Shannon–Wiener index values were observed in the Northeast Plain, Xinjiang, Hebei, Gansu, and Shanxi, while low values were concentrated in Yunnan, Guizhou, and the Guangdong-Guangxi region. Both areas experienced a shrinking trend. (3) Agricultural production factors such as multiple cropping indexes and theindustrial structure strongly explained the structural changes to ABEs, while the explanatory power of socio-economic factors can be enhanced after the interaction with agricultural production factors. (4) The relationship between farmers and new ABEs has shifted from a symbiotic relationship favoring farmers to a symbiotic relationship favoring new ABEs, with a significant spatial heterogenous layout among 286 cities. This study proposes a three-stage differentiation framework for ABEs: a simple structure dominated by traditional farmers, a competitive evolutionary dynamic among diversified ABEs, and a modernized structure led by new agricultural business entities. Based on these stages, this paper provides targeted recommendations for building a high-quality ABE system and advancing agricultural modernization.

Suggested Citation

  • Shenghao Zhu & Guanyi Yin & Qingzhi Sun & Zhan Zhang & Guanghao Li & Liangfei Gao, 2025. "Structural Changes to China’s Agricultural Business Entities System Under the Perspective of Competitive Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3024-:d:1623081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3024/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/7/3024/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Xiang & Shao, Shuai & Li, Ling, 2019. "Agricultural inputs, urbanization, and urban-rural income disparity: Evidence from China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 67-84.
    2. Zhou, Yang & Li, Xunhuan & Liu, Yansui, 2021. "Cultivated land protection and rational use in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    3. Johann Kirsten & Kurt Sartorius, 2002. "Linking agribusiness and small-scale farmers in developing countries: Is there a new role for contract farming?," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 503-529.
    4. Yijie Wang & Guoyong Liu & Bangbang Zhang & Zhiyou Liu & Xiaohu Liu, 2022. "Coordinated Development of Farmland Transfer and Labor Migration in China: Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Driving Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Qiang Jin & Hui Dang & Heng Wang & Zhenghe Zhang, 2024. "Exploring Cooperative Mechanisms in the Chinese Agricultural Value Chain: A Game Model Analysis Based on Leading Enterprises and Small Farmers," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, March.
    6. Tianli Wang & Yanji Ma & Siqi Luo, 2023. "Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Agricultural Leading Enterprises in Heilongjiang Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, October.
    7. Jiamin Liu & Xiaoyu Ma & Wenli Jia & Sisi Zhang, 2022. "Can New-Type Urbanization Construction Narrow the Urban–Rural Income Gap? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    8. Bohnsack, René, 2018. "Local niches and firm responses in sustainability transitions: The case of low-emission vehicles in China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 70, pages 20-32.
    9. Sheng-Yuan Wang & Wan-Ming Chen & Xiao-Lan Wu & A. E. Matouk, 2021. "Competition Analysis on Industry Populations Based on a Three-Dimensional Lotka–Volterra Model," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-15, July.
    10. Wei Yao & Yingyu Zhu & Shuyao Liu & Yan Zhang, 2024. "Can Agricultural Socialized Services Promote Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity? From the Perspective of Production Factor Allocation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-26, September.
    11. Reardon, Thomas & Barrett, Christopher B. & Berdegué, Julio A. & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2009. "Agrifood Industry Transformation and Small Farmers in Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(11), pages 1717-1727, November.
    12. Lingjuan Cheng & Yilin Cui & Kaifeng Duan & Wei Zou, 2022. "The Influence of New Agricultural Business Entities on Farmers’ Employment Decision," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    13. Xiaoqing Zhao & Yifei Xu & Qian Wang & Junwei Pu & Xiaoqian Shi & Pei Huang & Zexian Gu, 2022. "Sustainable Agricultural Development Models of the Ecologically Vulnerable Karst Areas in Southeast Yunnan from the Perspective of Human–Earth Areal System," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.
    14. Marasco, A. & Picucci, A. & Romano, A., 2016. "Market share dynamics using Lotka–Volterra models," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 49-62.
    15. Hongdong Guo & Robert W Jolly & Jianhua Zhu, 2007. "Contract Farming in China: Perspectives of Farm Households and Agribusiness Firms," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 49(2), pages 285-312, June.
    16. Tianshu Quan & Weiguo Jia & Tianli Quan & Yuyun Xu, 2024. "Impact of Farmers’ Participation in the Transformation of the Farmland Transfer Market on the Adoption of Agricultural Green Production Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-23, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viet Hoang & Vinh Nguyen, 2023. "Determinants of small farmers' participation in contract farming in developing countries: A study in Vietnam," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(3), pages 836-853, July.
    2. Ruofan Liao & Zhengtao Chen & Jirakom Sirisrisakulchai & Jianxu Liu, 2025. "Enhancing Rural Economic Sustainability in China Through Agricultural Socialization Services: A Novel Perspective on Spatial-Temporal Dynamics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, January.
    3. Saenger, Christoph & Torero, Máximo & Qaim, Matin, 2016. "Impact of third-party enforcement of contracts in agricultural markets—A field experiment in Vietnam," IFPRI book chapters, in: Devaux, André; Donovan, Jason; Horton, Douglas E.; Torero, Maximo (ed.), Innovation for inclusive value-chain development: Successes and challenges, chapter 11, pages 343-374, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    4. Raoul Herrmann & Ephraim Nkonya & Anja Faße, 2018. "Food value chain linkages and household food security in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(4), pages 827-839, August.
    5. Fanny Widadie & Jos Bijman & Jacques Trienekens, 2022. "Alignment between vertical and horizontal coordination for food quality and safety in Indonesian vegetable chains," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    6. Ba, Hélène A. & de Mey, Yann & Thoron, Sylvie & Demont, Matty, 2019. "Inclusiveness of contract farming along the vertical coordination continuum: Evidence from the Vietnamese rice sector," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    7. Sitko, Nicholas J. & Chisanga, Brian, 2016. "How Is Multinational Investment in Grain and Oilseed Trading Reshaping the Smallholder Markets in Zambia?," Food Security Collaborative Working Papers 234948, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    8. Nicholas J. Sitko & Brian Chisanga & David Tschirley & Thomas S. Jayne, 2018. "An evolution in the middle: examining the rise of multinational investment in smallholder grain trading in Zambia," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(2), pages 473-488, April.
    9. Kozhaya, Rodrique, 2020. "A systematic review of contract farming and it's impacts on broiler producers in Lebanon," MPRA Paper 99369, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Vincent Canwat & Myles Oelofse & Stephen Onakuse & Andreas de Neergaard, 2020. "Effects of certified‐organic production on supplier failures and potential income effects of supplier failures on producers: Evidence from vegetable and macadamia producers in Kenya," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(4), pages 751-769, October.
    11. Sebastian Kunte & Meike Wollni & Claudia Keser, 2017. "Making it personal: breach and private ordering in a contract farming experiment," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 44(1), pages 121-148.
    12. Ranran Hu & Hongwei Fang & Weizhong Liu, 2025. "How Do Vertical Alliances Form in Agricultural Supply Chains?—An Evolutionary Game Analysis Based on Chinese Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Soullier, Guillaume & Moustier, Paule, 2016. "Do contracts increase farmers’ incomes and food security? Evidence from the rice value chain in Senegal," 149th Seminar, October 27-28, 2016, Rennes, France 244790, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Abebe, Gumataw K. & Bijman, Jos & Kemp, Ron & Omta, Onno & Tsegaye, Admasu, 2013. "Contract farming configuration: Smallholders’ preferences for contract design attributes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 14-24.
    15. Viet Hoang, 2021. "Impact of Contract Farming on Farmers’ Income in the Food Value Chain: A Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Study in Vietnam," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, August.
    16. Sylvaine Lemeilleur, 2014. "The role of input vouchers in modernizing the fresh fruit and vegetable market in Turkey," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(4), pages 477-487, July.
    17. Ito, Junichi & Bao, Zongshun & Su, Qun, 2012. "Distributional effects of agricultural cooperatives in China: Exclusion of smallholders and potential gains on participation," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 700-709.
    18. Ejeta, Tadesse Tolera & Bai, Xiuguang, 2026. "Does the adoption of agricultural green production technologies improve eco-efficiency? Evidence from wheat farmers in Ethiopia," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    19. Schipmann, Christin & Qaim, Matin, 2011. "Supply chain differentiation, contract agriculture, and farmers' marketing preferences: The case of sweet pepper in Thailand," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 666-676, October.
    20. Dan Pan & Jinlong Zhou & Yi Yu & Shengdong Chen, 2024. "Rural Collective Property Rights System Reform and Urban-Rural Income Gap: A County-Scale Big Data Analysis in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:3024-:d:1623081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.