IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i22p14725-d966866.html

Can New-Type Urbanization Construction Narrow the Urban–Rural Income Gap? Evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Jiamin Liu

    (Xinjiang Innovation Management Research Center, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830002, China
    School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Xiaoyu Ma

    (Xinjiang Innovation Management Research Center, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830002, China
    School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830002, China)

  • Wenli Jia

    (School of Public Finance and Taxation, Xinjiang University of Finance & Economics, Urumqi 830012, China)

  • Sisi Zhang

    (Xinjiang Innovation Management Research Center, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830002, China
    School of Economics and Management, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830002, China)

Abstract

To promote economic development, an imbalance in urban–rural development has been caused by a policy of favoring urban areas in every county. Recently, breaking the “urban–rural dual structure” and emphasizing urban–rural “integration” have become the ideal models for most countries to realize sustainable urbanization development. In China, the main goals of new-type urbanization construction (NTUC) are to optimize the urban–rural structure and improve the living standards of rural residents, help narrow the urban–rural income gap (URIG), and realize urban–rural sustainable development. This paper mainly studied the effect of NTUC on the URIG, analyzing the dynamic impact and regional heterogeneity. The moderating effect of NTUC on the URIG was also tested. A difference-in-difference model and mediating effect model were used to investigate the impact of the NTUC on the URIG. We found that, firstly, NTUC can significantly reduce the URIG. After a series of robustness tests was implemented, the results still held. Secondly, the effect of NTUC on the URIG was −0.1684 in the short term and −0.1710 in the long term. NTUC can significantly reduce the URIG in the central and western regions, but the negative impact is insignificant in the eastern region. Thirdly, industrial structure upgrades and financial and digital development are all important ways that NTUC narrows the URIG. Finally, based on our research conclusions, we put forward corresponding countermeasures and suggestions related to the policy implementation of NTUC, regional differences, industrial structure upgrading, and financial and digital development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiamin Liu & Xiaoyu Ma & Wenli Jia & Sisi Zhang, 2022. "Can New-Type Urbanization Construction Narrow the Urban–Rural Income Gap? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14725-:d:966866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14725/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14725/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xin Meng, 2012. "Labor Market Outcomes and Reforms in China," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 26(4), pages 75-102, Fall.
    2. Akhter, Selim & Daly, Kevin J., 2009. "Finance and poverty: Evidence from fixed effect vector decomposition," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 191-206, September.
    3. Paulson, Anna L. & Townsend, Robert, 2004. "Entrepreneurship and financial constraints in Thailand," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 10(2), pages 229-262, March.
    4. Amitrajeet A. Batabyal & Hamid Beladi, 2019. "Preference matching, income, and population distribution in urban and adjacent rural regions," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 98(5), pages 2201-2208, October.
    5. Mingyong Hong & Wenjie Zhang, 2021. "Industrial structure upgrading, urbanization and urban-rural income disparity: evidence from China," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(15), pages 1321-1326, September.
    6. Eliana La Ferrara & Alberto Chong & Suzanne Duryea, 2012. "Soap Operas and Fertility: Evidence from Brazil," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 4(4), pages 1-31, October.
    7. Imai, Katsushi S. & Arun, Thankom & Annim, Samuel Kobina, 2010. "Microfinance and Household Poverty Reduction: New Evidence from India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 1760-1774, December.
    8. Sylviane Guillaumont Jeanneney & Kangni Kpodar, 2011. "Financial Development and Poverty Reduction: Can There be a Benefit without a Cost?," Post-Print halshs-00554229, HAL.
    9. Jiao, Man & Xu, Hengzhou, 2022. "How do Collective Operating Construction Land (COCL) Transactions affect rural residents’ property income? Evidence from rural Deqing County, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    10. David Lagakos, 2020. "Urban-Rural Gaps in the Developing World: Does Internal Migration Offer Opportunities?," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 34(3), pages 174-192, Summer.
    11. Sylviane Guillaumont Jeanneney & Kangni Kpodar, 2011. "Financial Development and Poverty Reduction: Can There be a Benefit without a Cost?," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 143-163.
    12. Wang, Siliang & Tan, Shukui & Yang, Shengfu & Lin, Qiaowen & Zhang, Lu, 2019. "Urban-biased land development policy and the urban-rural income gap: Evidence from Hubei Province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    13. Choi, In, 2001. "Unit root tests for panel data," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 249-272, April.
    14. Amelie Constant & Klaus Zimmermann, 2006. "The Making of Entrepreneurs in Germany: Are Native Men and Immigrants Alike?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 279-300, April.
    15. Guoqun Ma & Danyang Lv & Yuxi Luo & Tuanbiao Jiang, 2022. "Environmental Regulation, Urban-Rural Income Gap and Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-22, July.
    16. Sylviane Guillaumont Jeanneney & Kangni Kpodar, 2011. "Financial Development and Poverty Reduction: Can There Be a Benefit Without a Cost?," Post-Print halshs-00601306, HAL.
    17. Thorsten Beck & Asli Demirgüç-Kunt & Ross Levine, 2007. "Finance, inequality and the poor," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 27-49, March.
    18. Dwight W. Adamson & David E. Clark & Mark D. Partridge, 2004. "Do Urban Agglomeration Effects and Household Amenities have a Skill Bias?," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(2), pages 201-224, May.
    19. Mingxing Chen & Yuan Zhou & Xinrong Huang & Chao Ye, 2021. "The Integration of New-Type Urbanization and Rural Revitalization Strategies in China: Origin, Reality and Future Trends," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    20. Gao, Yanyan & Zang, Leizhen & Sun, Jun, 2018. "Does computer penetration increase farmers’ income? An empirical study from China," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 345-360.
    21. Yong Liu & Cuihong Long, 2021. "Urban and Rural Income Gap: Does Urban Spatial Form Matter in China?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440211, March.
    22. Kanbur, Ravi & Wang, Yue & Zhang, Xiaobo, 2021. "The great Chinese inequality turnaround," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 467-482.
    23. Lu, Jiangyong & Tao, Zhigang, 2010. "Determinants of entrepreneurial activities in China," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 25(3), pages 261-273, May.
    24. Zhong Zhao, 2005. "Migration, Labor Market Flexibility, and Wage Determination in China: A Review," Labor and Demography 0507009, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    25. Wu, Haitao & Hao, Yu & Ren, Siyu & Yang, Xiaodong & Xie, Guo, 2021. "Does internet development improve green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    26. Jayati Ghosh, 2013. "Microfinance and the challenge of financial inclusion for development," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 37(6), pages 1203-1219.
    27. Nerine Mary George & Vinit Parida & Tom Lahti & Joakim Wincent, 2016. "A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 309-350, June.
    28. Bernard Fingleton & Simonetta Longhi, 2013. "The Effects Of Agglomeration On Wages: Evidence From The Micro-Level," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 443-463, August.
    29. Barton H. Hamilton, 2000. "Does Entrepreneurship Pay? An Empirical Analysis of the Returns to Self-Employment," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 108(3), pages 604-631, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shenghao Zhu & Guanyi Yin & Qingzhi Sun & Zhan Zhang & Guanghao Li & Liangfei Gao, 2025. "Structural Changes to China’s Agricultural Business Entities System Under the Perspective of Competitive Evolution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Guolei Zhou & Zuopeng Ma & Pingyu Zhang, 2025. "The Relationship Between Population Shrinkage, Ageing, and New-Type Urbanization in Counties: The Case of Jilin Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Atul MEHTA & Joysankar BHATTACHARYA, 2018. "Financial sector development and the poor in developing countries: revisiting the access to finance channel," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(3(616), A), pages 153-168, Autumn.
    2. Bao Zhu & Shiting Zhai & Jing He, 2018. "Is the Development of China’s Financial Inclusion Sustainable? Evidence from a Perspective of Balance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Mushtaq, Rizwan & Bruneau, Catherine, 2019. "Microfinance, financial inclusion and ICT: Implications for poverty and inequality," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Nayab Akhtar & Abdul Rashid, 2024. "Financial development and sustainable development: A review of literature," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 7114-7139, December.
    5. Atul Mehta & Joysankar Bhattacharya, 2017. "What Works Best for the Poor in Rural India," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 18(2), pages 230-245, September.
    6. repec:pra:mprapa:99376 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Clement Olalekan Olaniyi & James Temitope Dada & Nicholas Mbaya Odhiambo & Xuan Vinh Vo, 2023. "Modelling asymmetric structure in the finance-poverty nexus: empirical insights from an emerging market economy," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 453-487, February.
    8. Sèna Kimm Gnangnon, 2023. "Do unilateral trade preferences help reduce poverty in beneficiary countries?," International Journal of Economic Policy Studies, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 249-288, February.
    9. James Temitope Dada & Taiwo Akinlo, 2021. "Foreign direct investment and poverty reduction in sub-Saharan Africa: does environmental degradation matter?," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-10, December.
    10. Armand Fouejieu & Ratna Sahay & Martin Cihak & Shiyuan Chen, 2020. "Financial inclusion and inequality: A cross-country analysis," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(8), pages 1018-1048, November.
    11. Neaime, Simon & Gaysset, Isabelle, 2024. "Financial inclusion, integration, and stability asymmetries in the Mediterranean region," The Journal of Economic Asymmetries, Elsevier, vol. 30(C).
    12. Giulia Bettin & Claudia Pigini & Alberto Zazzaro, 2020. "Financial inclusion and poverty transitions: an empirical analysis for Italy," Mo.Fi.R. Working Papers 164, Money and Finance Research group (Mo.Fi.R.) - Univ. Politecnica Marche - Dept. Economic and Social Sciences.
    13. Lubinga, Moses H., 2016. "The role of agricultural trade and policy complementarities in poverty reduction in South Africa," NAMC Publications 253094, National Agricultural Marketing Council.
    14. Pierre Mandon & Clément Mathonnat, 2015. "Forms of Democracies and Financial Development," Working Papers halshs-01196108, HAL.
    15. Lizhi Tang & Mingcong Chen & Yan Tang, 2026. "Inclusive finance development and intergenerational income mobility: evidence from China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Thierry Mamadou Asngar, 2022. "Does financial development improve access to electricity in sub-Saharan Africa?," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Hung M. Pham & Huong H.D. Truong & Nham L. Vuong, 2025. "The Impact of Financial Development on Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence From Asia-Pacific Countries," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(4), pages 21582440251, December.
    18. Bodea, Cristina & Houle, Christian & Kim, Hyunwoo, 2021. "Do financial crises increase income inequality?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    19. Boukhatem, Jamel, 2016. "Assessing the direct effect of financial development on poverty reduction in a panel of low- and middle-income countries," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 214-230.
    20. Pierre Mandon & Clément Mathonnat, 2014. "Forms of Democracies and Financial Development," CERDI Working papers halshs-01084679, HAL.
    21. Chakravarty, Satya R. & Pal, Rupayan, 2013. "Financial inclusion in India: An axiomatic approach," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 813-837.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:22:p:14725-:d:966866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.