IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i5p1064-d1147978.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scaling-Up of the Production of Biochar from Olive Tree Pruning for Agricultural Use: Evaluation of Biochar Characteristics and Phytotoxicity

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Crespo-Barreiro

    (Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Institute of Environment, Natural Resources and Biodiversity, University of León, Av. Portugal, 41, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Natalia Gómez

    (Department of Mining, Topographical and Structural Technology, School of Mines, University of Leon, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Judith González-Arias

    (Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Institute of Environment, Natural Resources and Biodiversity, University of León, Av. Portugal, 41, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Noemí Ortiz-Liébana

    (Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Institute of Environment, Natural Resources and Biodiversity, University of León, Av. Portugal, 41, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Fernando González-Andrés

    (Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Institute of Environment, Natural Resources and Biodiversity, University of León, Av. Portugal, 41, 24071 León, Spain)

  • Jorge Cara-Jiménez

    (Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Institute of Environment, Natural Resources and Biodiversity, University of León, Av. Portugal, 41, 24071 León, Spain)

Abstract

Due to the large acreage of olive trees in the Mediterranean basin, the biochar from olive tree pruning may become an important resource as part of circular economy strategies. However, so far, there is not much knowledge on whether the same characteristics are repeated in biochar once production is up-scaled to an industrial level. Accordingly, this study aimed to scale up the production of olive tree pruning biochar with three reactors (semi-pilot, pilot and industrial) to ascertain the production parameters that determine the characteristics of the obtained biochar and its possible toxicity to use in agriculture or environmental applications. First, the production conditions in the semi-pilot reactor were optimised by testing three temperatures (400, 500 and 600 °C), with the result that 600 °C was the optimal production temperature because of a high carbon content (70.88%), moderate pH (8.1), good carbon sink (R50 > 0.5) and low contents of PAHs (<6 mg/kg) and heavy metals, resulting in a phytostimulanting effect for all the crops studied. Then, the production was upscaled, using 600 °C as pyrolysing temperature. At the industrial scale, accurate temperature control is essential because when temperatures above 650 °C were reached, the biochar showed a pH above 11, resulting in severe phytotoxicity. The longer retention time of the material in the industrial pyrolysers improved the carbon stability and, therefore, the biochar’s role as a carbon sink. Consequently, it was proven that it is possible to produce olive tree pruning biochar adequate for agriculture and environmental applications with large-scale equipment, and the two most important factors needing control are the temperature and retention time.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Crespo-Barreiro & Natalia Gómez & Judith González-Arias & Noemí Ortiz-Liébana & Fernando González-Andrés & Jorge Cara-Jiménez, 2023. "Scaling-Up of the Production of Biochar from Olive Tree Pruning for Agricultural Use: Evaluation of Biochar Characteristics and Phytotoxicity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1064-:d:1147978
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/5/1064/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/5/1064/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chiappero, Marco & Norouzi, Omid & Hu, Mingyu & Demichelis, Francesca & Berruti, Franco & Di Maria, Francesco & Mašek, Ondřej & Fiore, Silvia, 2020. "Review of biochar role as additive in anaerobic digestion processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    2. Parantap Basu & Robert Kollmann, 2013. "Productive Government Purchases And The Real Exchange Rate," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 81(4), pages 461-469, July.
    3. Parantap Basu, 2010. "Government Purchases and the Real Exchange Rate: A Comment," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 65-67, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Noemí Ortiz-Liébana & Andrea Crespo-Barreiro & Ismael Mazuecos-Aguilera & Fernando González-Andrés, 2023. "Improved Organic Fertilisers Made from Combinations of Compost, Biochar, and Anaerobic Digestate: Evaluation of Maize Growth and Soil Metrics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schreiner, Lena & Madlener, Reinhard, 2022. "Investing in power grid infrastructure as a flexibility option: A DSGE assessment for Germany," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. A. S. Benetrix & P. R. Lane, 2013. "Fiscal Shocks and the Real Exchange Rate," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 9(3), pages 6-37, September.
    3. Moritz Cruz & Armando Sánchez‐Vargas, 2022. "Government spending and the exchange rate: Exploring this relationship in Mexico using a cointegrated system of equations," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 587-605, February.
    4. Andrea Salazar-Díaz & Aarón Levi Garavito-Acosta & Sergio Restrepo Ángel & Leidy Viviana Arcila-Agudelo, 2023. "Real Equilibrium Exchange Rate in Colombia: Thousands of VEC Models Approach," Lecturas de Economía, Universidad de Antioquia, Departamento de Economía, issue 99, pages 33-78, July-Dece.
    5. Abbas, Yasir & Yun, Sining & Wang, Ziqi & Zhang, Yongwei & Zhang, Xianmei & Wang, Kaijun, 2021. "Recent advances in bio-based carbon materials for anaerobic digestion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    6. Marco Riguzzi & Philipp Wegmueller, 2017. "Economic Openness and Fiscal Multipliers," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(1), pages 1-35, January.
    7. Di Giorgio, Giorgio & Nisticò, Salvatore & Traficante, Guido, 2018. "Government spending and the exchange rate," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 55-73.
    8. Anthony J. Makin, 2013. "The policy (in)effectiveness of government spending in a dependent economy," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 287-301, September.
    9. Bouakez, Hafedh & Eyquem, Aurélien, 2015. "Government spending, monetary policy, and the real exchange rate," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 178-201.
    10. Deng, Chen & Lin, Richen & Kang, Xihui & Wu, Benteng & Wall, David & Murphy, Jerry D., 2022. "Improvement in biohydrogen and volatile fatty acid production from seaweed through addition of conductive carbon materials depends on the properties of the conductive materials," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).
    11. Marie-Pierre HORY & Grégory LEVIEUGE & Daria ONORI, 2018. "The (low) fiscal multiplier when debt is denominated in foreign currency," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2583, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    12. Makin, Anthony J. & Layton, Allan, 2021. "The global fiscal response to COVID-19: Risks and repercussions," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 340-349.
    13. Hyuk Rhee & Nurlan Turdaliev, 2012. "Targeting Rules for an Open Economy," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 447-471, July.
    14. Jessica Quintana-Najera & A. John Blacker & Louise A. Fletcher & Andrew B. Ross, 2023. "Understanding the Influence of Biochar Augmentation in Anaerobic Digestion by Principal Component Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.
    15. Nakije Kida, 2020. "Dynamic Relationship Between Government Spending, Final Consumption and Savings: Evidence from Southeast Europe," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(2), pages 521-539.
    16. Matteo Cacciatore & Nora Traum, 2022. "Trade Flows and Fiscal Multipliers," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 104(6), pages 1206-1223, November.
    17. Laura Povoledo, 2017. "Modelling the sectoral allocation of labour in open economy models," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(3), pages 685-710, August.
    18. Giancarlo Corsetti & André Meier & Gernot J. Müller, 2012. "What determines government spending multipliers? [Mafia and public spending: Evidence of the fiscal multiplier from a quasi-experiment’, mimeo]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 27(72), pages 521-565.
    19. Kollmann, Robert & Ratto, Marco & Roeger, Werner & in′t Veld, Jan, 2013. "Fiscal policy, banks and the financial crisis," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 387-403.
    20. Mosleh Uddin, Md & Wen, Zhiyou & Mba Wright, Mark, 2022. "Techno-economic and environmental impact assessment of using corn stover biochar for manure derived renewable natural gas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:5:p:1064-:d:1147978. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.