IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i6p1364-d1609389.html

The Substitution of Natural Gas with Biomethane in an Industrial Fluidized Bed Sand Drying Process

Author

Listed:
  • Mônica Valéria dos Santos Machado

    (Department of Chemistry and Energy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, São Paulo State University, Campus of Guaratinguetá, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, SP, Brazil)

  • João Andrade de Carvalho

    (Department of Chemistry and Energy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, São Paulo State University, Campus of Guaratinguetá, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, SP, Brazil)

  • Ivonete Ávila

    (Department of Chemistry and Energy, Faculty of Science and Engineering, São Paulo State University, Campus of Guaratinguetá, Guaratinguetá 12516-410, SP, Brazil)

  • Andreas Nascimento

    (Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Federal University of Itajubá, Itajubá 37500-903, MG, Brazil)

  • Felipe Solferini de Carvalho

    (Solferini Energia e Meio Ambiente, Lorena 12606-320, SP, Brazil)

Abstract

Drying sand using a fluidized bed process is very common in the industries that use the material in their processes. The fluidized bed system works by introducing gas and excess air into a bed to achieve the temperature required to dry the particulate material. This system is used in various industrial processes, including gasification, pyrolysis, grain drying and industrial sand. The main objective of this research was to analyze the sand drying system used in an industrial process with a fluidized bed and to verify the interchangeability and costs between natural gas and biomethane operation. To achieve this, an energy balance was developed using a specific mathematical model to calculate the amount of fuel required for the process as a function of the excess air. The specific consumption of fuel gas (m 3 of gas per t of dry sand) is the most important parameter for the performance of the sand drying equipment, and the mathematical model developed in this research was used to determine this parameter. It was found that the specific consumption drops significantly until the flue gas temperature reaches around 600 °C. Beyond this point, it continues to decrease, but at a much slower rate. To determine the energy balance, this study was divided into two parts: the combustion chamber and the fluidizer itself. In the combustion chamber, the temperature of the injected gases was determined as a parameter, and sand with a known initial moisture content was considered in the fluidizer. In comparison with real industrial data collected from a company consuming natural gas, the model achieved good agreement. In terms of interchangeability between operations with natural gas and biomethane, the results show that the gases are interchangeable in sand drying, although there is a difference between the Wobbe indices of more than the usually recommended 5%.

Suggested Citation

  • Mônica Valéria dos Santos Machado & João Andrade de Carvalho & Ivonete Ávila & Andreas Nascimento & Felipe Solferini de Carvalho, 2025. "The Substitution of Natural Gas with Biomethane in an Industrial Fluidized Bed Sand Drying Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1364-:d:1609389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1364/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/6/1364/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matteo Galloni & Gioele Di Marcoberardino, 2024. "Biogas Upgrading Technology: Conventional Processes and Emerging Solutions Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-29, June.
    2. Alamia, Alberto & Magnusson, Ingemar & Johnsson, Filip & Thunman, Henrik, 2016. "Well-to-wheel analysis of bio-methane via gasification, in heavy duty engines within the transport sector of the European Union," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 445-454.
    3. Hakawati, Rawan & Smyth, Beatrice M. & McCullough, Geoffrey & De Rosa, Fabio & Rooney, David, 2017. "What is the most energy efficient route for biogas utilization: Heat, electricity or transport?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1076-1087.
    4. Mônica Valéria dos Santos Machado & Ivonete Ávila & João Andrade de Carvalho, 2024. "Bibliometric Analysis of Renewable Natural Gas (Biomethane) and Overview of Application in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Scarlat, Nicolae & Dallemand, Jean-François & Fahl, Fernando, 2018. "Biogas: Developments and perspectives in Europe," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PA), pages 457-472.
    6. Chiappero, Marco & Norouzi, Omid & Hu, Mingyu & Demichelis, Francesca & Berruti, Franco & Di Maria, Francesco & Mašek, Ondřej & Fiore, Silvia, 2020. "Review of biochar role as additive in anaerobic digestion processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Baena-Moreno, Francisco M. & Malico, Isabel & Rodríguez-Galán, Mónica & Serrano, Antonio & Fermoso, Fernando G. & Navarrete, Benito, 2020. "The importance of governmental incentives for small biomethane plants in South Spain," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    8. Sales Silva, Sara Talita & Barros, Regina Mambeli & Silva dos Santos, Ivan Felipe & Maria de Cassia Crispim, Adriele & Tiago Filho, Geraldo Lúcio & Silva Lora, Electo Eduardo, 2022. "Technical and economic evaluation of using biomethane from sanitary landfills for supplying vehicles in the Southeastern region of Brazil," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 1142-1157.
    9. Herbes, Carsten & Rilling, Benedikt & Ringel, Marc, 2021. "Policy frameworks and voluntary markets for biomethane – How do different policies influence providers’ product strategies?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    10. Montanari, Tania & Finocchio, Elisabetta & Salvatore, Enrico & Garuti, Gilberto & Giordano, Andrea & Pistarino, Chiara & Busca, Guido, 2011. "CO2 separation and landfill biogas upgrading: A comparison of 4A and 13X zeolite adsorbents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 314-319.
    11. Selvaggi, Roberta & Pappalardo, Gioacchino & Chinnici, Gaetano & Fabbri, Claudio I., 2018. "Assessing land efficiency of biomethane industry: A case study of Sicily," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 689-695.
    12. Sun, Hui & Wang, Enzhen & Li, Xiang & Cui, Xian & Guo, Jianbin & Dong, Renjie, 2021. "Potential biomethane production from crop residues in China: Contributions to carbon neutrality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    13. Krzysztof Biernat & Izabela Samson-Bręk & Zdzisław Chłopek & Marlena Owczuk & Anna Matuszewska, 2021. "Assessment of the Environmental Impact of Using Methane Fuels to Supply Internal Combustion Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-19, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felipe Solferini de Carvalho & Luiz Carlos Bevilaqua dos Santos Reis & Pedro Teixeira Lacava & Fernando Henrique Mayworm de Araújo & João Andrade de Carvalho Jr., 2023. "Substitution of Natural Gas by Biomethane: Operational Aspects in Industrial Equipment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-19, January.
    2. Małgorzata Pawłowska & Magdalena Zdeb & Marta Bis & Lucjan Pawłowski, 2025. "State and Perspectives of Biomethane Production and Use—A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-43, May.
    3. Padi, Richard Kingsley & Douglas, Sean & Murphy, Fionnuala, 2023. "Techno-economic potentials of integrating decentralised biomethane production systems into existing natural gas grids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Roozbeh Feiz & Jonas Ammenberg & Annika Björn & Yufang Guo & Magnus Karlsson & Yonghui Liu & Yuxian Liu & Laura Shizue Moriga Masuda & Alex Enrich-Prast & Harald Rohracher & Kristina Trygg & Sepehr Sh, 2019. "Biogas Potential for Improved Sustainability in Guangzhou, China—A Study Focusing on Food Waste on Xiaoguwei Island," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-25, March.
    5. Alessandro Casasso & Marta Puleo & Deborah Panepinto & Mariachiara Zanetti, 2021. "Economic Viability and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Budget of the Biomethane Retrofit of Manure-Operated Biogas Plants: A Case Study from Piedmont, Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H. & Rezazadeh, A. & Kabiri, S., 2020. "A feasibility study on the potential, economic, and environmental advantages of biogas production from poultry manure in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 87-106.
    7. Rawan Hakawati & Beatrice Smyth & Helen Daly & Geoffrey McCullough & David Rooney, 2019. "Is the Fischer-Tropsch Conversion of Biogas-Derived Syngas to Liquid Fuels Feasible at Atmospheric Pressure?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Jiapei Wei & Gefu Liang & James Alex & Tongchao Zhang & Chunbo Ma, 2020. "Research Progress of Energy Utilization of Agricultural Waste in China: Bibliometric Analysis by Citespace," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Catalano, Giovanni & D'Adamo, Idiano & Gastaldi, Massimo & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ribichini, Marco, 2024. "Incentive policies in biomethane production toward circular economy," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    10. Anna Bartkowiak & Piotr Bartkowiak & Grzegorz Kinelski, 2022. "Efficiency of Shaping the Value Chain in the Area of the Use of Raw Materials in Agro-Biorefinery in Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Xue, Shengrong & Zhang, Siqi & Wang, Ying & Wang, Yanbo & Song, Jinghui & Lyu, Xingang & Wang, Xiaojiao & Yang, Gaihe, 2022. "What can we learn from the experience of European countries in biomethane industry: Taking China as an example?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    12. Muñoz, P. & González-Menorca, C. & Sánchez-Vázquez, R. & Sanchez-Prieto, J. & Fraile Del Pozo, A., 2024. "Determining biomethane potential from animal-source industry wastes by anaerobic digestion: A case study from La rioja, Spain," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    13. O'Connor, S. & Ehimen, E. & Pillai, S.C. & Black, A. & Tormey, D. & Bartlett, J., 2021. "Biogas production from small-scale anaerobic digestion plants on European farms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    14. D'Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Gastaldi, Massimo & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "RES-T trajectories and an integrated SWOT-AHP analysis for biomethane. Policy implications to support a green revolution in European transport," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. Andrea Baccioli & Lorenzo Ferrari & Romain Guiller & Oumayma Yousfi & Francesco Vizza & Umberto Desideri, 2019. "Feasibility Analysis of Bio-Methane Production in a Biogas Plant: A Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-16, February.
    16. Gray, Nathan & O'Shea, Richard & Smyth, Beatrice & Lens, Piet N.L. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2022. "What is the energy balance of electrofuels produced through power-to-fuel integration with biogas facilities?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Haider, Junaid & Qadeer, Kinza & Valentina, Valentina & Khan, Amin & Yasin, Muhammad & Aslam, Muhammad & De Guido, Giorgia & Pellegrini, Laura A. & Lee, Moonyong, 2020. "Biogas to liquefied biomethane: Assessment of 3P's–Production, processing, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    18. Rilling, Benedikt & Kurz, Peter & Herbes, Carsten, 2024. "Renewable gases in the heating market: Identifying consumer preferences through a Discrete Choice Experiment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    19. Gulnar Gadirli & Agnieszka A. Pilarska & Jacek Dach & Krzysztof Pilarski & Alicja Kolasa-Więcek & Klaudia Borowiak, 2024. "Fundamentals, Operation and Global Prospects for the Development of Biogas Plants—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-26, January.
    20. Marta Guerra-Mota & Thereza Aquino, 2026. "Getting biomethane out of the shadow: a framework analysis in Portugal and Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 5639-5671, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:6:p:1364-:d:1609389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.