IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i8p1557-d1210369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved Organic Fertilisers Made from Combinations of Compost, Biochar, and Anaerobic Digestate: Evaluation of Maize Growth and Soil Metrics

Author

Listed:
  • Noemí Ortiz-Liébana

    (Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Institute of Environment, Natural Resources and Biodiversity, University of León, Av. Portugal, 41, 24009 León, Spain)

  • Andrea Crespo-Barreiro

    (Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Institute of Environment, Natural Resources and Biodiversity, University of León, Av. Portugal, 41, 24009 León, Spain)

  • Ismael Mazuecos-Aguilera

    (Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Institute of Environment, Natural Resources and Biodiversity, University of León, Av. Portugal, 41, 24009 León, Spain)

  • Fernando González-Andrés

    (Chemical, Environmental and Bioprocess Engineering Group, Institute of Environment, Natural Resources and Biodiversity, University of León, Av. Portugal, 41, 24009 León, Spain)

Abstract

Treated bio-residues can be used as biostimulants in crops within the circular economy approach to reduce the use of traditional fertilisers. In this work, we optimised the combination rates for three types of treated bio-residues (compost, biochar, and anaerobic digestate (AD)) in two microcosm trials, one with a combination of compost and biochar and other with biochar and AD. The crop used was maize, and the variables analysed were plant growth, and soil chemical and biological properties. The combination of bio-residues improved plant growth and soil biological activity to a greater extent than one product alone; that is, compost and biochar performed better than compost alone and biochar, and AD performed better than biochar alone. However, while the concentration in the plant biomass of several essential nutrients for crops increased in the treatments with compost and biochar, and with biochar and AD, compared to the untreated controls, the nitrogen concentration was reduced. This was due to the competition for nitrogen between the plant and the soil microbiome, whose activity was activated. Due to the importance of nitrogen in plant growth, the increase in biomass production could be explained not only by the higher availability of other nutrients but also by the plant-growth-promoting activity exerted by the more active soil microbiome. Further research should focus on validating this hypothesis and unravelling the mechanisms involved. From the environmental site, the presence of biochar in the mixtures of organic residues reduced the soil nitrogen at risk of lixiviation and sequestered carbon, which partially compensated for the increased CO 2 emissions because labile forms of carbon were present in the remaining organic residues.

Suggested Citation

  • Noemí Ortiz-Liébana & Andrea Crespo-Barreiro & Ismael Mazuecos-Aguilera & Fernando González-Andrés, 2023. "Improved Organic Fertilisers Made from Combinations of Compost, Biochar, and Anaerobic Digestate: Evaluation of Maize Growth and Soil Metrics," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1557-:d:1210369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1557/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/8/1557/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ugo De Corato, 2020. "Towards New Soil Management Strategies for Improving Soil Quality and Ecosystem Services in Sustainable Agriculture: Editorial Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-5, November.
    2. Alexander Wezel & Margriet Goris & Janneke Bruil & Georges F. Félix & Alain Peeters & Paolo Bàrberi & Stéphane Bellon & Paola Migliorini, 2018. "Challenges and Action Points to Amplify Agroecology in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    3. Andrea Crespo-Barreiro & Natalia Gómez & Judith González-Arias & Noemí Ortiz-Liébana & Fernando González-Andrés & Jorge Cara-Jiménez, 2023. "Scaling-Up of the Production of Biochar from Olive Tree Pruning for Agricultural Use: Evaluation of Biochar Characteristics and Phytotoxicity," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katarzyna Zawalińska & Alexandra Smyrniotopoulou & Katalin Balazs & Michael Böhm & Mihai Chitea & Violeta Florian & Mihaela Fratila & Piotr Gradziuk & Stuart Henderson & Katherine Irvine & Vasilia Kon, 2022. "Advancing the Contributions of European Stakeholders in Farming Systems to Transitions to Agroecology," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 50-63, December.
    2. Verburg, René W. & Verberne, Emma & Negro, Simona O., 2022. "Accelerating the transition towards sustainable agriculture: The case of organic dairy farming in the Netherlands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Matthew C. LaFevor & Aoife K. Pitts, 2022. "Irrigation Increases Crop Species Diversity in Low-Diversity Farm Regions of Mexico," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Inga C. Melchior & Jens Newig, 2021. "Governing Transitions towards Sustainable Agriculture—Taking Stock of an Emerging Field of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    5. Alba Linares Quero & Uxue Iragui Yoldi & Oriana Gava & Gerald Schwarz & Andrea Povellato & Carlos Astrain, 2022. "Assessment of the Common Agricultural Policy 2014–2020 in Supporting Agroecological Transitions: A Comparative Study of 15 Cases across Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-23, July.
    6. Chantal Gascuel & Michèle Tixier-Boichard & Benoit Dedieu & Cécile Détang-Dessendre & Pierre Dupraz & Philippe Faverdin & Laurent Hazard & Philippe Hinsinger & Isabelle Litrico-Chiarelli & Françoise M, 2019. "Réflexion prospective interdisciplinaire pour l’agroécologie. Rapport de synthèse," Post-Print hal-02154433, HAL.
    7. Aare, Ane Kirstine & Lund, Søren & Hauggaard-Nielsen, Henrik, 2021. "Exploring transitions towards sustainable farming practices through participatory research – The case of Danish farmers' use of species mixtures," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. Gomathy Sethuraman & Nurul Amalina Mohd Zain & Sumiani Yusoff & Yin Mei Ng & Niranjan Baisakh & Acga Cheng, 2021. "Revamping Ecosystem Services through Agroecology—The Case of Cereals," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Rosa Francaviglia & Jorge Álvaro-Fuentes & Claudia Di Bene & Lingtong Gai & Kristiina Regina & Eila Turtola, 2019. "Diversified Arable Cropping Systems and Management Schemes in Selected European Regions Have Positive Effects on Soil Organic Carbon Content," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Bernardo Martin-Gorriz & José A. Zabala & Virginia Sánchez-Navarro & Belén Gallego-Elvira & Víctor Martínez-García & Francisco Alcon & José Francisco Maestre-Valero, 2022. "Intercropping Practices in Mediterranean Mandarin Orchards from an Environmental and Economic Perspective," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Ugo De Corato, 2020. "Soil Microbiome Manipulation Gives New Insights in Plant Disease-Suppressive Soils from the Perspective of a Circular Economy: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-41, December.
    12. Mykola Dyvak & Artur Rot & Roman Pasichnyk & Vasyl Tymchyshyn & Nazar Huliiev & Yurii Maslyiak, 2021. "Monitoring and Mathematical Modeling of Soil and Groundwater Contamination by Harmful Emissions of Nitrogen Dioxide from Motor Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-15, March.
    13. Margriet Goris & Leonardo Van den Berg & Ivonete Da Silva Lopes & Jelle Behagel & Gerard Verschoor & Esther Turnhout, 2019. "Resignification Practices of Youth in Zona da Mata, Brazil in the Transition Toward Agroecology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22, January.
    14. Éva-Boglárka Vincze & Annamária Becze & Éva Laslo & Gyöngyvér Mara, 2024. "Beneficial Soil Microbiomes and Their Potential Role in Plant Growth and Soil Fertility," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.
    15. Giuseppe Gargano & Francesco Licciardo & Milena Verrascina & Barbara Zanetti, 2021. "The Agroecological Approach as a Model for Multifunctional Agriculture and Farming towards the European Green Deal 2030—Some Evidence from the Italian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    16. Corrado Ciaccia & Marta Di Pierro & Elena Testani & Giancarlo Roccuzzo & Marcello Cutuli & Danilo Ceccarelli, 2019. "Participatory Research towards Food System Redesign: Italian Case Study and Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-12, December.
    17. Lioutas, Evagelos D. & Charatsari, Chrysanthi, 2020. "Smart farming and short food supply chains: Are they compatible?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Alexander Wezel & Stéphane Bellon, 2018. "Mapping Agroecology in Europe. New Developments and Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-3, August.
    19. Marianna Guareschi & Michele Maccari & Juan Pablo Sciurano & Filippo Arfini & Andrea Pronti, 2020. "A Methodological Approach to Upscale Toward an Agroecology System in EU-LAFSs: The Case of the Parma Bio-District," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:8:p:1557-:d:1210369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.