IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/eurcho/v21y2022i3p50-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advancing the Contributions of European Stakeholders in Farming Systems to Transitions to Agroecology

Author

Listed:
  • Katarzyna Zawalińska
  • Alexandra Smyrniotopoulou
  • Katalin Balazs
  • Michael Böhm
  • Mihai Chitea
  • Violeta Florian
  • Mihaela Fratila
  • Piotr Gradziuk
  • Stuart Henderson
  • Katherine Irvine
  • Vasilia Konstantidelli
  • Vitaliy Krupin
  • Laure Latruffe
  • Elvyra Mikšytė
  • David Miller
  • Daniel Monteleone
  • Marcus Polaschegg
  • Gerald Schwarz
  • Joseph Tzanopoulos
  • Irene Tzouramani
  • George Vlahos
  • Adrianna Wojciechowska

Abstract

The concept of a ‘just transition’ is gaining traction in international policy discourses. It has particular significance in relation to achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions and the need for ensuring rights and responsibilities of all actors in transitions to agroecological farming systems. Research plays an important role in accompanying this transformation. It explores pathways for more sustainable and fair food systems, barriers to them being achieved, and where and what risks arise for communities of interest and of place. Researchers and practitioners across levels and sectors were brought together in H2020 projects LIFT and UNISECO using processes of stakeholder engagement. Both projects analysed the perceptions of actors towards agroecological farming, and their active involvement in the transitions required. This article summarises lessons learnt regarding multi‐actor engagement in different participatory settings in both projects, including a Multi‐Actor Platform approach, Q method, DELPHI and Hybrid forum workshops. The interactions involved several hundred actors from 18 countries across Europe. The article reflects on implications of the Covid‐19 pandemic on the processes and effectiveness of multi‐actor engagement, and assessments of the impacts on the empowerment of the actors. The findings are contextualised by contemporary European Union and national policy objectives of tackling climate change, the loss of biodiversity, and inequalities. Le concept de ‘transition juste’ gagne du terrain dans les discours de politique au niveau international. Il revêt une importance particulière en ce qui concerne l'annulation des émissions nettes de gaz à effet de serre et la nécessité de garantir les droits et les responsabilités de tous les acteurs dans les transitions vers des systèmes agricoles agroécologiques. La recherche joue un rôle important pour accompagner cette transformation. Elle explore les voies vers des systèmes alimentaires plus durables et équitables, les obstacles à leur réalisation, et où et quels risques surviennent pour les communautés d'intérêt et de lieu. Des chercheurs et des praticiens de tous les niveaux et de tous les secteurs ont été réunis dans les projets H2020 LIFT et UNISECO en utilisant des processus d'engagement des parties prenantes. Les deux projets ont analysé les perceptions des acteurs vis‐à‐vis de l'agriculture agroécologique et leur implication active dans les transitions nécessaires. Cet article résume les leçons apprises concernant l'engagement multi‐acteurs dans différents contextes participatifs dans les deux projets, y compris une approche de plate‐forme multi‐acteurs, la méthode Q, DELPHI et des ateliers de forum hybrides. Les interactions ont impliqué plusieurs centaines d'acteurs de 18 pays à travers l'Europe. L'article réfléchit aux implications de la pandémie de Covid‐19 sur les processus et l'efficacité de l'engagement multi‐acteurs, et évalue les impacts sur l'autonomisation des acteurs. Les résultats sont examinés dans le contexte de l'Union européenne contemporaine et des objectifs de politique nationaux de lutte contre le changement climatique, la perte de biodiversité et les inégalités. Das Konzept des ‚gerechten Übergangs‘ gewinnt im internationalen politischen Diskurs zunehmend an Bedeutung. Besondere Bedeutung hat es im Zusammenhang mit dem Erreichen von Netto‐Null‐Treibhausgasemissionen und der Notwendigkeit, Rechte und Pflichten aller Beteiligten beim Übergang zu agrarökologischen Anbausystemen zu gewährleisten. Die Forschung spielt eine wichtige Rolle bei der Begleitung dieses Wandels. Sie erforscht Wege zu nachhaltigeren und gerechteren Lebensmittelsystemen, Hindernisse, die einer Umsetzung im Wege stehen, und wo und welche Risiken für Interessen‐ und Ortsgemeinschaften entstehen. In den H2020‐Projekten LIFT und UNISECO wurden Personen aus der Wissenschaft und Praxis auf verschiedenen Ebenen und in verschiedenen Sektoren mit Hilfe von Verfahren zur Einbeziehung von Interessengruppen zusammengebracht. Beide Projekte analysierten die Wahrnehmung der Beteiligten gegenüber der agrarökologischen Landwirtschaft und ihre aktive Mitwirkung an den erforderlichen Umstellungen. Dieser Artikel fasst die Erfahrungen zusammen, die in den beiden Projekten im Hinblick auf die Einbindung der verschiedenen Beteiligten in unterschiedlichen partizipativen Kontexten gemacht wurden. Hierzu zählen der Ansatz einer Multiakteursplattform, die Q‐Methode, DELPHI und Workshops in Hybridforen. An den Interaktionen nahmen mehrere hundert Beteiligte aus 18 Ländern in ganz Europa teil. Der Artikel befasst sich mit den Auswirkungen der Covid‐19‐Pandemie auf die Prozesse und die Wirksamkeit der Multiakteurspartizipation sowie mit der Bewertung der Auswirkungen auf das Empowerment der Beteiligten. Die Ergebnisse werden in den Kontext aktueller politischer Ziele der Europäischen Union und der Mitgliedstaaten gestellt, die darin bestehen, den Klimawandel, den Verlust der biologischen Vielfalt und Ungleichheiten zu bekämpfen.

Suggested Citation

  • Katarzyna Zawalińska & Alexandra Smyrniotopoulou & Katalin Balazs & Michael Böhm & Mihai Chitea & Violeta Florian & Mihaela Fratila & Piotr Gradziuk & Stuart Henderson & Katherine Irvine & Vasilia Kon, 2022. "Advancing the Contributions of European Stakeholders in Farming Systems to Transitions to Agroecology," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 50-63, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:50-63
    DOI: 10.1111/1746-692X.12378
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12378
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/1746-692X.12378?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cook, Brian R. & Satizábal, Paula & Curnow, Jayne, 2021. "Humanising agricultural extension: A review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    2. Ika Darnhofer, 2014. "Resilience and why it matters for farm management," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 41(3), pages 461-484.
    3. Gerald Schwarz & Francesco Vanni & David Miller & Janne Helin & Jaroslav Pražan & Fabrizio Albanito & Mihaela Fratila & Francesco Galioto & Oriana Gava & Katherine Irvine & Jan Landert & Alba Linares , 2022. "Exploring Sustainability Implications of Transitions to Agroecology: a Transdisciplinary Perspective," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 37-47, December.
    4. Alexander Wezel & Margriet Goris & Janneke Bruil & Georges F. Félix & Alain Peeters & Paolo Bàrberi & Stéphane Bellon & Paola Migliorini, 2018. "Challenges and Action Points to Amplify Agroecology in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    5. V. Ernesto Méndez & Martha Caswell & Stephen R. Gliessman & Roseann Cohen, 2017. "Integrating Agroecology and Participatory Action Research (PAR): Lessons from Central America," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Miller & Sophie Legras & Andrew Barnes & Mara Cazacu & Oriana Gava & Janne Helin & Katherine Irvine & Jochen Kantelhardt & Jan Landert & Laure Latruffe & Andreas Mayer & Andreas Niedermayr & And, 2022. "Creating Conditions for Harnessing the Potential of Transitions to Agroecology in Europe and Requirements for Policy," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 21(3), pages 72-79, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nathan Einbinder & Helda Morales & Mateo Mier y Terán Giménez Cacho & Bruce G. Ferguson & Miriam Aldasoro & Ronald Nigh, 2022. "Agroecology from the ground up: a critical analysis of sustainable soil management in the highlands of Guatemala," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(3), pages 979-996, September.
    2. Aare, Ane Kirstine & Lund, Søren & Hauggaard-Nielsen, Henrik, 2021. "Exploring transitions towards sustainable farming practices through participatory research – The case of Danish farmers' use of species mixtures," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    3. Shingo Yoshida & Hironori Yagi, 2021. "Long-Term Development of Urban Agriculture: Resilience and Sustainability of Farmers Facing the Covid-19 Pandemic in Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Ricardo Serra Borsatto & Vanilde Ferreira Souza-Esquerdo & Henrique Carmona Duval & Fernando Silveira Franco & Fabio Grigoletto, 2022. "Winning hearts and minds through a policy promoting the agroecological paradigm in universities," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(1), pages 5-18, March.
    5. Miranda P.M. Meuwissen & Peter H. Feindt & Peter Midmore & Erwin Wauters & Robert Finger & Franziska Appel & Alisa Spiegel & Erik Mathijs & Katrien J.A.M. Termeer & Alfons Balmann & Yann de Mey & Pytr, 2020. "The Struggle of Farming Systems in Europe: Looking for Explanations through the Lens of Resilience," EuroChoices, The Agricultural Economics Society, vol. 19(2), pages 4-11, August.
    6. Daniele, Bertolozzi-Caredio & Barbara, Soriano & Isabel, Bardaji & Alberto, Garrido, 2022. "Analysis of perceived robustness, adaptability and transformability of Spanish extensive livestock farms under alternative challenging scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Basharat Ali & Peter Dahlhaus, 2022. "Roles of Selective Agriculture Practices in Sustainable Agricultural Performance: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, March.
    8. Khalilullah Mayar & David G. Carmichael & Xuesong Shen, 2022. "Resilience and Systems—A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    9. Verburg, René W. & Verberne, Emma & Negro, Simona O., 2022. "Accelerating the transition towards sustainable agriculture: The case of organic dairy farming in the Netherlands," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    10. Lecegui, Antonio & Olaizola, Ana María & López-i-Gelats, Feliu & Varela, Elsa, 2022. "Implementing the livelihood resilience framework: An indicator-based model for assessing mountain pastoral farming systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    11. Thorsøe, Martin Hvarregaard & Noe, Egon Bjørnshave & Lamandé, Mathieu & Frelih-Larsen, Ana & Kjeldsen, Chris & Zandersen, Marianne & Schjønning, Per, 2019. "Sustainable soil management - Farmers’ perspectives on subsoil compaction and the opportunities and barriers for intervention," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 427-437.
    12. Ebitu, Larmbert & Avery, Helen & Mourad, Khaldoon A. & Enyetu, Joshua, 2021. "Citizen science for sustainable agriculture – A systematic literature review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. George Van Voorn & Geerten Hengeveld & Jan Verhagen, 2020. "An agent based model representation to assess resilience and efficiency of food supply chains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-27, November.
    14. Xin Mai & Roger C. K. Chan, 2020. "Detecting the intellectual pathway of resilience thinking in urban and regional studies: A critical reflection on resilience literature," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 876-889, September.
    15. Soubry, Bernard & Sherren, Kate, 2022. ""You keep using that word...": Disjointed definitions of resilience in food systems adaptation," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    16. Slijper, Thomas & Urquhart, Julie & Poortvliet, P. Marijn & Soriano, Bárbara & Meuwissen, Miranda P.M., 2022. "Exploring how social capital and learning are related to the resilience of Dutch arable farmers," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Victor Ye. Kovalev & Aleksandr N. Semin, 2021. "Resilience of Russia’s agri-food market under customs imbalances of the Eurasian integration," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 22(3), pages 28-43, October.
    18. Dwyer Janet, 2016. "New Approaches to Revitalise Rural Economies and Communities – Reflections of a Policy Analyst," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 8(2), pages 175-182, June.
    19. Heitor Mancini Teixeira & Leonardo Van den Berg & Irene Maria Cardoso & Ardjan J. Vermue & Felix J. J. A. Bianchi & Marielos Peña-Claros & Pablo Tittonell, 2018. "Understanding Farm Diversity to Promote Agroecological Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Pierre Chiaverina & Sophie Drogué & Florence Jacquet & Larry Lev & Robert King, 2023. "Does short food supply chain participation improve farm economic performance? A meta‐analysis," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 54(3), pages 400-413, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:eurcho:v:21:y:2022:i:3:p:50-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.