IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v9y2019i4p90-d291024.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-Production and Co-Creation

Author

Listed:
  • Tina Jukić

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Primož Pevcin

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Jože Benčina

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Mitja Dečman

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Sanja Vrbek

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the content analysis of 139 Web of Science papers focused on collaborative innovation with external stakeholders of public administration, specifically on co-production and co-creation. The analysis included papers published between 2009 and 2018 and was based on a coding scheme consisting of 12 parameters grouped into four groups: paper descriptors, financial support of the research, methodological framework, and co-creation characteristics. The results reveal a considerable increase in researchers’ interest in co-production and co-creation in the context of public administration in the last few years. This is particularly the case in Northern and Western Europe, where Anglo-Saxon and Nordic administrative traditions dominate. Furthermore, the results show that co-creation is most often placed in the contexts of social policy and welfare, as well as health care. Over the selected period, research seldom addressed companies as a target group in the co-creation of public services—in comparison to citizens and internal users. More than three quarters of the papers observed were empirical and less than 20% were quantitative. In general, a lack of conceptual clarity was often identified through the interchangeable usage of the terms co-creation and co-creation and the low level of international comparison—the majority of the papers focused on case descriptions at a national level, even though collaborative innovation is strongly related to administrative traditions dominating in specific regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Tina Jukić & Primož Pevcin & Jože Benčina & Mitja Dečman & Sanja Vrbek, 2019. "Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-Production and Co-Creation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:4:p:90-:d:291024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/4/90/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/9/4/90/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cepiku & Giordano, 2014. "Co-Production in Developing Countries: Insights from the community health workers experience," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 317-340, April.
    2. Jacob Torfing, 2019. "Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 1-11, January.
    3. Stephen P Osborne & Zoe Radnor & Kirsty Strokosch, 2016. "Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment?," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 639-653, May.
    4. Pestoff, 2014. "Collective Action and the Sustainability of Co-Production," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 383-401, April.
    5. Wendy Hardyman & Kate L. Daunt & Martin Kitchener, 2015. "Value Co-Creation through Patient Engagement in Health Care: A micro-level approach and research agenda," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 90-107, January.
    6. Alford, 2014. "The Multiple Facets of Co-Production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 299-316, April.
    7. Ora-orn Poocharoen & Bernard Ting, 2015. "Collaboration, Co-Production, Networks: Convergence of theories," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 587-614, April.
    8. Brian N. Williams & Seong-Cheol Kang & Japera Johnson, 2016. "(Co)-Contamination as the Dark Side of Co-Production: Public value failures in co-production processes," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 692-717, May.
    9. Aghaei Chadegani, Arezoo & Salehi, Hadi & Md Yunus, Melor & Farhadi, Hadi & Fooladi, Masood & Farhadi, Maryam & Ale Ebrahim, Nader, 2013. "A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases," MPRA Paper 46898, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 18 Mar 2013.
    10. William Voorberg & Victor Bekkers & Sophie Flemig & Krista Timeus & Piret Tõnurist & Lars Tummers, 2017. "Does co-creation impact public service delivery? The importance of state and governance traditions," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(5), pages 365-372, July.
    11. Efe Sevin, 2016. "Branding Cities in the Age of Social Media: A Comparative Assessment of Local Government Performance," Public Administration and Information Technology, in: Mehmet Zahid Sobaci (ed.), Social Media and Local Governments, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 301-320, Springer.
    12. Michelle Farr, 2016. "Co-Production and Value Co-Creation in Outcome-Based Contracting in Public Services," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(5), pages 654-672, May.
    13. W. H. Voorberg & V. J. J. M. Bekkers & L. G. Tummers, 2015. "A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Embarking on the social innovation journey," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1333-1357, October.
    14. Hannu Torvinen & Lotta Haukipuro, 2018. "New roles for end-users in innovative public procurement: case study on user engaging property procurement," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(10), pages 1444-1464, October.
    15. Fledderus & Brandsen & Honingh, 2014. "Restoring Trust Through the Co-Production of Public Services: A theoretical elaboration," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(3), pages 424-443, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dorotea Ottaviani & Merve Demiröz & Hanna Szemző & Claudia De Luca, 2023. "Adapting Methods and Tools for Participatory Heritage-Based Tourism Planning to Embrace the Four Pillars of Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aldona Frączkiewicz-Wronka & Martyna Wronka-Pośpiech, 2018. "How Practices of Managing Partnerships Contributes to the Value Creation—Public–Social Partnership Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    2. Rocco Palumbo & Stefania Vezzosi & Paola Picciolli & Alessandro Landini & Carmela Annarumma & Rosalba Manna, 2018. "Fostering organizational change through co-production. Insights from an Italian experience," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 371-391, September.
    3. Aldona Fraczkiewicz-Wronka & Anna Kozak, 2021. "Facilitating Co-production in Health Promotion: Study of Senior Councils in Poland," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4B), pages 182-201.
    4. Stefano Landi & Salvatore Russo, 2019. "Co-production as an interpretative framework in the creation of value in public services," Working Papers 01, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    5. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    6. Pwint Kay Khine & Jianing Mi & Raza Shahid, 2021. "A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public service innovation networks (PSINs): an instrument for collaborative innovation and value co-creation in public service(s)," Working Papers halshs-01934284, HAL.
    8. Floriana Fusco & Marta Marsilio & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2018. "La co-production in sanit?: un?analisi bibliometrica," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(108), pages 35-54.
    9. Noella Edelmann & Ines Mergel, 2021. "Co-Production of Digital Public Services in Austrian Public Administrations," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Jonathan Rösler & Tobias Söll & Louise Hancock & Thomas Friedli, 2021. "Value Co-Creation between Public Service Organizations and the Private Sector: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Cristina Campanale & Sara Giovanna Mauro & Alessandro Sancino, 2021. "Managing co-production and enhancing good governance principles: insights from two case studies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(1), pages 275-306, March.
    12. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Les réseaux d'innovation de service public (RISP) : un instrument d'innovation collaborative et de co-création de valeur dans le(s) service(s) public(s)," Working Papers halshs-01934290, HAL.
    13. Jim Broch Skarli, 2021. "Creating or Destructing Value in Use? Handling Cognitive Impairments in Co-Creation with Serious and Chronically Ill Users," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Puksas Andrius & Gudelis Dangis & Raišienė Agota Giedrė & Gudelienė Nomeda, 2019. "Business, Government, Society and Science Interest in Co-Production by Relative Evaluation Using Google Trends," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 81(1), pages 55-71, June.
    15. Jacob Torfing & Eva Sørensen, 2019. "Interactive Political Leadership in Theory and Practice: How Elected Politicians May Benefit from Co-Creating Public Value Outcomes," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Vassallo, Jarrod P. & Banerjee, Sourindra & Zaman, Hasanuzzaman & Prabhu, Jaideep C., 2023. "Design thinking and public sector innovation: The divergent effects of risk-taking, cognitive empathy and emotional empathy on individual performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(6).
    17. Manuel Alméstar & Sara Romero-Muñoz & Nieves Mestre & Uriel Fogué & Eva Gil & Amanda Masha, 2023. "(Un)Likely Connections between (Un)Likely Actors in the Art/NBS Co-Creation Process: Application of KREBS Cycle of Creativity to the Cyborg Garden Project," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-25, May.
    18. Roberto Vivona & Mehmet Akif Demircioglu & David B. Audretsch, 2023. "The costs of collaborative innovation," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 873-899, June.
    19. Tan, Wee-Liang & Zuckermann, Ghil'ad, 2021. "External impetus, co-production and grassroots innovations: The case of an innovation involving a language," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    20. Cinar, Emre & Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif & Acik, Ahmet Coskun & Simms, Chris, 2024. "Public sector innovation in a city state: exploring innovation types and national context in Singapore," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:9:y:2019:i:4:p:90-:d:291024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.