IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v10y2025a9519.html

A Decision Support Model for Assessing Co‐Creation: The Bee Path Project

Author

Listed:
  • Tina Jukić

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)

  • Sanja Vrbek

    (Faculty of Public Administration, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia)

Abstract

This article presents a decision support model (DSM) for assessing the quality of co‐creation processes and critically reflects on its applicability in the context of climate change mitigation in urban settings. While cities have become pivotal in addressing climate change, often through co‐creation, tools for evaluating urban climate‐related co‐creation initiatives remain scarce. Rather than advocating for a tool specifically designed for this context, the article seeks to offer a universal DSM developed through a systematic literature review and empirical case studies within the framework of the COGOV Horizon project. The DSM incorporates 19 attributes across three phases of co‐creation: stakeholder identification and mobilisation, the act of co‐creation, and its effects. The model is tested on the Bee Path initiative of the City of Ljubljana, a successful co‐creation project aimed at fostering a bee‐friendly urban environment and promoting self‐sufficiency. The results confirm the DSM’s applicability in assessing the success of co‐creation in the context of climate change policies at the city level of governance. Moreover, this tool offers a foundation model for further integration with emerging technologies to enhance decision‐making and guidance for public organisations. As such, the DSM serves as a practical tool enabling public organisations to critically reflect on their roles in co‐creation initiatives, identify areas for improvement, and enhance their capacity as co‐creators in future urban climate policies and beyond.

Suggested Citation

  • Tina Jukić & Sanja Vrbek, 2025. "A Decision Support Model for Assessing Co‐Creation: The Bee Path Project," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:9519
    DOI: 10.17645/up.9519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/9519
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.9519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Noella Edelmann & Shefali Virkar, 2023. "The Impact of Sustainability on Co-Creation of Digital Public Services," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Anna Wiewiora & Robyn Keast & Kerry Brown, 2016. "Opportunities and Challenges in Engaging Citizens in the Co-Production of Infrastructure-Based Public Services in Australia," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 483-507, April.
    3. Eva Sørensen & Jacob Torfing, 2022. "Co‐creating ambitious climate change mitigation goals: The Copenhagen experience," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 572-587, April.
    4. Wendy Hardyman & Kate L. Daunt & Martin Kitchener, 2015. "Value Co-Creation through Patient Engagement in Health Care: A micro-level approach and research agenda," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(1), pages 90-107, January.
    5. Tina Jukić & Primož Pevcin & Jože Benčina & Mitja Dečman & Sanja Vrbek, 2019. "Collaborative Innovation in Public Administration: Theoretical Background and Research Trends of Co-Production and Co-Creation," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Debbie Isobel Keeling & Kathleen Keeling & Ko Ruyter & Angus Laing, 2021. "How value co-creation and co-destruction unfolds: a longitudinal perspective on dialogic engagement in health services interactions," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 236-257, March.
    2. Havíř David, 2017. "A Comparison of the Approaches to Customer Experience Analysis," Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 31(1), pages 82-93, August.
    3. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public Service Innovation Networks (PSINs): Collaborating for Innovation and Value Creation," Working Papers halshs-01934275, HAL.
    4. Valtteri Kaartemo & Helena Känsäkoski, 2018. "Information and Knowledge Processes in Health Care Value Co-Creation and Co-Destruction," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, December.
    5. Liu, Huiyuan & Perera, Sandun C. & Wang, Jian-Jun & Leonhardt, James M., 2023. "Physician engagement in online medical teams: A multilevel investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    6. Xiaoyan Ding & Xiang You & Xin Zhang & Yue Yu, 2022. "Can Patients Co-Create Value in an Online Healthcare Platform? An Examination of Value Co-Creation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Benoît Desmarchelier & Faridah Djellal & Faïz Gallouj, 2018. "Public service innovation networks (PSINs): an instrument for collaborative innovation and value co-creation in public service(s)," Working Papers halshs-01934284, HAL.
    8. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Silvia Cosimato & Rocco Palumbo & Alessandra Storlazzi, 2017. "Value Co-creation in the Health Service Ecosystems: The Enabling Role of Institutional Arrangements," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(12), pages 222-238, December.
    9. Antonio Botti & Antonella Monda, 2020. "Sustainable Value Co-Creation and Digital Health: The Case of Trentino eHealth Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-17, June.
    10. Salvatore Russo & Stefania Simoni, 2025. "NAVIGATING CO-PRODUCTION CHALLENGES IN HEALTHCARE PPPs: INSIGHTS FROM MULTIPLE CASE STUDIES," Working Papers 13, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    11. Vargo, Stephen L. & Lusch, Robert F., 2017. "Service-dominant logic 2025," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 46-67.
    12. Bin Ding & Wei Liu & Sang-Bing Tsai & Dongxiao Gu & Fang Bian & Xuefeng Shao, 2019. "Effect of Patient Participation on Nurse and Patient Outcomes in Inpatient Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Thomas Schulz & Markus Böhm & Heiko Gewald & Zehra Celik & Helmut Krcmar, 2020. "The Negative Effects of Institutional Logic Multiplicity on Service Platforms in Intermodal Mobility Ecosystems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(5), pages 417-433, October.
    14. Maiken Meldgaard & Rikke Damkjær Maimburg & Maiken Fabricius Damm & Anna Aaby & Anna Peeters & Helle Terkildsen Maindal, 2022. "The Health Literacy in Pregnancy (HeLP) Program Study Protocol: Development of an Antenatal Care Intervention Using the Ophelia Process," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    15. Stuart Read & Stefan Michel & Jan H. Schumann & Kumar Rakesh Ranjan, 2019. "Pricing co-created value: an integrative framework and research agenda," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 9(3), pages 155-183, December.
    16. Floriana Fusco & Marta Marsilio & Chiara Guglielmetti, 2018. "La co-production in sanit?: un?analisi bibliometrica," MECOSAN, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(108), pages 35-54.
    17. D’Arco, Mario & Lo Presti, Letizia & Marino, Vittoria & Maggiore, Giulio, 2021. "Is sustainable tourism a goal that came true? The Italian experience of the Cilento and Vallo di Diano National Park," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Kim Ulvin & Laila Tingvold & Karina Aase & Siv Fladsrud Magnussen, 2024. "The Role of Expectation Management in Value Creation: A Case Study on Municipal Managers’ Experiences with Offering Supported Housing," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Monica Cerdan Chiscano, 2021. "Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and the Family Inclusive Airport Design Experience," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-16, July.
    20. Magdalena Potz & Hazal Koca, 2026. "Repenser l’inclusivité de la co-création : voies vers une participation élargie," Post-Print hal-05251334, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v10:y:2025:a:9519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.