IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v166y2025icp1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the tenability of shared electric mobility alternatives: Will car users adopt eHUBs?

Author

Listed:
  • Singh, Harpreet
  • Kathuria, Ankit
  • Kavta, Kuldeep
  • Bosehans, Gustav
  • Bell, Margaret Carol
  • Dissanayake, Dilum

Abstract

Unlike single vehicle sharing schemes, eHUBs offer at least two of a wide range of shared electric-vehicles to meet users' diverse travel needs. Since there is limited knowledge about multi-modal electric vehicle sharing schemes, this study examines individual's intentions to use eHUBs with particular attention to car users. Based on survey responses from 3310 car users across six European countries including the Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, and the United Kingdom, the study examines how each individuals' attitudes and socio-demographic variables affect their intentions to use different vehicles offered by eHUBs. Findings show that positive and negative attitudes toward shared mobility and their acceptance of alternate modes significantly affect intentions, while environmental beliefs have no statistically significant effect. Furthermore, age and gender emerged as significant predictors of intentions, and car users showed higher propensity to use shared electric-cars and electric-bikes over electric-cargo bikes. Based on the findings, the study presents recommendations of ways to encourage and incentivise private car users' to use shared mobility alternatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Singh, Harpreet & Kathuria, Ankit & Kavta, Kuldeep & Bosehans, Gustav & Bell, Margaret Carol & Dissanayake, Dilum, 2025. "Exploring the tenability of shared electric mobility alternatives: Will car users adopt eHUBs?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-17.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:166:y:2025:i:c:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25000708
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.02.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Buranelli de Oliveira, Marina & Moretti Ribeiro da Silva, Hermes & Jugend, Daniel & De Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Paro, Carlos Eduardo, 2022. "Factors influencing the intention to use electric cars in Brazil," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 418-433.
    2. Bamberg, Sebastian & Fujii, Satoshi & Friman, Margareta & Gärling, Tommy, 2011. "Behaviour theory and soft transport policy measures," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 228-235, January.
    3. Jun Li & Jiachao Shen & Bicen Jia, 2021. "Exploring Intention to Use Shared Electric Bicycles by the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, April.
    4. Burghard, Uta & Scherrer, Aline, 2022. "Sharing vehicles or sharing rides - Psychological factors influencing the acceptance of carsharing and ridepooling in Germany," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    5. Craig Standing & Susan Standing & Sharon Biermann, 2019. "The implications of the sharing economy for transport," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 226-242, March.
    6. Zhang, Xin & Zhong, Shiquan & Ling, Shuai & Jia, Ning & Qi, Hang & He, Zhengbing, 2022. "How to promote the transition from solo driving to mobility services delivery? An empirical study focusing on ridesharing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 176-187.
    7. Hensher, David A. & Nelson, John D. & Mulley, Corinne, 2022. "Electric car sharing as a service (ECSaaS) – Acknowledging the role of the car in the public mobility ecosystem and what it might mean for MaaS as eMaaS?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 212-216.
    8. Sonja Haustein & Anu Siren, 2015. "Older People's Mobility: Segments, Factors, Trends," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 466-487, July.
    9. Kavta, Kuldeep & Bösehans, Gustav & Bell, Margaret Carol & Liao, Fanchao & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida & Dissanayake, Dilum, 2024. "Assessing the spatial transferability of mode choice models: A case of shared electric mobility hubs (eHUBS) in Amsterdam and Manchester," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 101-111.
    10. Curtale, Riccardo & Liao, Feixiong & van der Waerden, Peter, 2021. "User acceptance of electric car-sharing services: The case of the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 266-282.
    11. Bucher, Dominik & Buffat, René & Froemelt, Andreas & Raubal, Martin, 2019. "Energy and greenhouse gas emission reduction potentials resulting from different commuter electric bicycle adoption scenarios in Switzerland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Mounce, Richard & Nelson, John D., 2019. "On the potential for one-way electric vehicle car-sharing in future mobility systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 17-30.
    13. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Q. & Phuong Tran, Anh Thi & Nguyen, Tiep Van & Le, Phuong Thi & Su, Diep Ngoc, 2021. "Investigating the complexity of perceived service quality and perceived safety and security in building loyalty among bus passengers in Vietnam – A PLS-SEM approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 162-173.
    14. Innocenti, Alessandro & Lattarulo, Patrizia & Pazienza, Maria Grazia, 2013. "Car stickiness: Heuristics and biases in travel choice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 158-168.
    15. Ellis Keller & Andrea Aguilar & Daniel Hanss, 2018. "Car Sharers’ Interest in Integrated Multimodal Mobility Platforms: A Diffusion of Innovations Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    16. Andrea Gorrini & Rawad Choubassi & Federico Messa & Wafaa Saleh & Augustus Ababio-Donkor & Maria Chiara Leva & Lorraine D’Arcy & Francesco Fabbri & David Laniado & Pablo Aragón, 2021. "Unveiling Women’s Needs and Expectations as Users of Bike Sharing Services: The H2020 DIAMOND Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-29, May.
    17. Manjunath, Archana & Gross, George, 2017. "Towards a meaningful metric for the quantification of GHG emissions of electric vehicles (EVs)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 423-429.
    18. Stradling, S. G. & Meadows, M. L. & Beatty, S., 2000. "Helping drivers out of their cars Integrating transport policy and social psychology for sustainable change," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 207-215, July.
    19. Donald A. Chapman & Johan Eyckmans & Karel Van Acker, 2020. "Does Car-Sharing Reduce Car-Use? An Impact Evaluation of Car-Sharing in Flanders, Belgium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-27, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fengyu Guo & Linjie Gao, 2025. "A Meta-Analysis of Shared Mobility Adoption: The Role of Cultural Moderators and Key Psychological Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kapousizis, Georgios & Sarker, Rumana & Baran Ulak, M. & Geurs, Karst, 2024. "User acceptance of smart e-bikes: What are the influential factors? A cross-country comparison of five European countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Khalek, Sk Abu & Chakraborty, Anirban, 2022. "“I like to use but do not wish to own†: Exploring the role of de-ownership orientation in the adoption of access-based services," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Tanto Adi Waluyo & Muhammad Zudhy Irawan & Dewanti, 2022. "Adopting Electric Motorcycles for Ride-Hailing Services: Influential Factors from Driver’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, September.
    4. Vasja Roblek & Maja Meško & Iztok Podbregar, 2021. "Impact of Car Sharing on Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2013. "Residential dissonance and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-28.
    6. de Palma, André & Vosough, Shaghayegh & Liao, Feixiong, 2022. "An overview of effects of COVID-19 on mobility and lifestyle: 18 months since the outbreak," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 372-397.
    7. Sumitkumar, Rathor & Al-Sumaiti, Ameena Saad, 2024. "Shared autonomous electric vehicle: Towards social economy of energy and mobility from power-transportation nexus perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    8. Lars E. Olsson & Jana Huck & Margareta Friman, 2018. "Intention for Car Use Reduction: Applying a Stage-Based Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    9. Mounce, Richard & Beecroft, Mark & Nelson, John D., 2020. "On the role of frameworks and smart mobility in addressing the rural mobility problem," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. Palm, Alvar & Lantz, Björn, 2020. "Information dissemination and residential solar PV adoption rates: The effect of an information campaign in Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    11. Alfiero, Simona & Battisti, Enrico & Ηadjielias, Elias, 2022. "Black box technology, usage-based insurance, and prediction of purchase behavior: Evidence from the auto insurance sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    12. Hafram, Maryam & Hasim, Abdul Hafid, 2018. "Factors Affecting Subjective Norms in Use and Have a Private Vehicle in Makassar, Indonesia," INA-Rxiv jfzh3, Center for Open Science.
    13. Dugan, Anna & Mayer, Jakob & Thaller, Annina & Bachner, Gabriel & Steininger, Karl W., 2022. "Developing policy packages for low-carbon passenger transport: A mixed methods analysis of trade-offs and synergies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    14. Mohammadbashir Sedighi & Hamideh Parsaeiyan & Yashar Araghi, 2021. "An Empirical Study of Intention to Continue Using of Digital Ride-hailing Platforms," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 489-515, November.
    15. Lisa Dang & Widar von Arx, 2021. "How Can Rail Use for Leisure and Tourism Be Promoted? Using Leisure and Mobility Orientations to Segment Swiss Railway Customers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    16. Adeline Gu'eret & Wolf-Peter Schill & Carlos Gaete-Morales, 2024. "Impacts of electric carsharing on a power sector with variable renewables," Papers 2402.19380, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    17. Hsieh, Hsu-Sheng, 2020. "Transport policy evaluation based on elasticity analysis with social interactions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 273-296.
    18. Euchi, Jalel & Kallel, Ahmed, 2021. "Internalization of external congestion and CO2emissions costs related to road transport: The case of Tunisia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    19. Goletz, Mirko & Haustein, Sonja & Wolking, Christina & L’Hostis, Alain, 2020. "Intermodality in European metropolises: The current state of the art, and the results of an expert survey covering Berlin, Copenhagen, Hamburg and Paris," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 109-122.
    20. Donna, Javier D., 2018. "Measuring Long-Run Price Elasticities in Urban Travel Demand," MPRA Paper 90059, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:166:y:2025:i:c:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.