IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v81y2025ics0160791x25000223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable crowdshipping: Navigating technological fit and security risks

Author

Listed:
  • Chua, Rachel
  • Wu, Min
  • Yuen, Kum Fai

Abstract

‘Crowdshipping’ (CS), a burgeoning trend propelled by the upsurge in e-commerce after the COVID-19 pandemic, combines crowdsourcing and shipping, giving rise to a novel logistical paradigm. While shipping entails the physical transportation of goods, crowdsourcing involves task delegation to a network of individuals through an open call. This departure from conventional courier services for last-mile delivery leverages the collective potential of the online public. Using the health belief model and task–technology fit (TTF) theory, this study introduces a theoretical model that delves into the fundamental factors influencing consumer acceptance of CS as a last-mile delivery service within urban landscapes, encompassing its technological alignment. A comprehensive analysis of 450 survey responses, using structural equation modelling, revealed that expected outcome, self-efficacy, perceived threat (security and privacy) and cues to action directly influence consumers acceptance. Contrarily, task and technology characteristics can indirectly influence consumer acceptance through TTF. Analysis of the total effects revealed that cues to action have the strongest impact on consumer acceptance. The study aimed to illuminate consumer perspectives regarding the integration of CS as a last-mile delivery alternative and to enrich urban green logistical planning and regulatory frameworks for policymakers accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Chua, Rachel & Wu, Min & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2025. "Sustainable crowdshipping: Navigating technological fit and security risks," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000223
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102832
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000223
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102832?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Koh, Le Yi & Lee, Jia Yi & Wang, Xueqin & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Urban drone adoption: Addressing technological, privacy and task–technology fit concerns," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    2. Zhou, Min & Long, Piao & Kong, Nan & Zhao, Lindu & Jia, Fu & Campy, Kathryn S., 2021. "Characterizing the motivational mechanism behind taxi driver’s adoption of electric vehicles for living: Insights from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 134-152.
    3. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Lavieri, Patricia Sauri, 2024. "Public transportation-based crowd-shipping initiatives: Are users willing to participate? Why not?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Ling, Hsiao-Chi & Chen, Hong-Ren & Ho, Kevin K.W. & Hsiao, Kuo-Lun, 2021. "Exploring the factors affecting customers’ intention to purchase a smart speaker," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    5. Yuen, Kum Fai & Bin Saidi, Muhammad Syukri & Bai, Xiwen & Wang, Xueqin, 2021. "Cruise transport service usage post COVID-19: The health belief model application," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 185-196.
    6. Zhou, Min & Yin, Jia & Tang, Yu & Yi, Huan & Kong, Nan & Campy, Kathryn S., 2024. "What drives the drivers away? An empirical study on the factors influencing the turnover intention of full-time online ride-hailing drivers in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    7. Punel, Aymeric & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2017. "Modeling the acceptability of crowdsourced goods deliveries: Role of context and experience effects," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 18-38.
    8. Yuen, Kum Fai & Ng, Wei Hong & Wang, Xueqin, 2023. "Switching intention in the online crowdsourced delivery environment: The influence of a platform's technological characteristics and relational bonding strategies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    9. Chandra Kant Upadhyay & Vijayshri Tewari & Vineet Tiwari, 2021. "Assessing the impact of sharing economy through adoption of ICT based crowdshipping platform for last-mile delivery in urban and semi-urban India," Information Technology for Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(4), pages 670-696, October.
    10. Armstrong, J. Scott & Overton, Terry S., 1977. "Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys," MPRA Paper 81694, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Joel Alcedo & Alberto Cavallo & Bricklin Dwyer & Prachi Mishra & Antonio Spilimbergo, 2022. "Back to Trend: COVID Effects on E-commerce in 47 Countries," NBER Working Papers 29729, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Zhou, Min & Huang, Jinlong & Wu, Kexin & Huang, Xin & Kong, Nan & Campy, Kathryn S., 2021. "Characterizing Chinese consumers’ intention to use live e-commerce shopping," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Cai, Lanhui & Yuen, Kum Fai & Xie, Diancen & Fang, Mingjie & Wang, Xueqin, 2021. "Consumer's usage of logistics technologies: Integration of habit into the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Cebeci, Merve Seher & Tapia, Rodrigo Javier & Kroesen, Maarten & de Bok, Michiel & Tavasszy, Lóránt, 2023. "The effect of trust on the choice for crowdshipping services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    15. Dale L. Goodhue, 1995. "Understanding User Evaluations of Information Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(12), pages 1827-1844, December.
    16. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank, 2018. "The integration of item-sharing and crowdshipping: Can collaborative consumption be pushed by delivering through the crowd?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 227-243.
    17. Devari, Aashwinikumar & Nikolaev, Alexander G. & He, Qing, 2017. "Crowdsourcing the last mile delivery of online orders by exploiting the social networks of retail store customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 105-122.
    18. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Ghaderi, Hadi & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G., 2023. "Crowdshipping for sustainable urban logistics: A systematic review of the literature," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    19. Hui-Ting Huang & Yu-Ming Kuo & Shiang-Ru Wang & Chia-Fen Wang & Chung-Hung Tsai, 2016. "Structural Factors Affecting Health Examination Behavioral Intention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Chandra Kant Upadhyay & Vijayshri Tiwari & Vineet Tiwari, 2022. "Generation “Z” willingness to participate in crowdshipping services to achieve sustainable last-mile delivery in emerging market," International Journal of Emerging Markets, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 19(9), pages 2446-2471, November.
    21. Pourrahmani, Elham & Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    22. Yuen, Kum Fai & Wang, Xueqin & Ng, Li Ting Wendy & Wong, Yiik Diew, 2018. "An investigation of customers’ intention to use self-collection services for last-mile delivery," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 1-8.
    23. Xiao Lin & Yoshinari Nishiki & Lóránt A. Tavasszy, 2020. "Performance and Intrusiveness of Crowdshipping Systems: An Experiment with Commuting Cyclists in The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-14, September.
    24. Fessler, Andreas & Cash, Philip & Thorhauge, Mikkel & Haustein, Sonja, 2023. "A public transport based crowdshipping concept: Results of a field test in Denmark," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 106-118.
    25. Salini Devi Rajendran & Siti Norida Wahab, 2022. "Investigating last-mile delivery options on online shoppers experience and repurchase intention," International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(2), pages 224-241.
    26. Kianoush Mousavi & Merve Bodur & Matthew J. Roorda, 2022. "Stochastic Last-Mile Delivery with Crowd-Shipping and Mobile Depots," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(3), pages 612-630, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Qilong & Xiao, Haohan & Xu, Min & Qu, Ting, 2024. "Investigating the impact of late deliveries on the operations of the crowd-shipping platform: A mean-variance analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Rossolov, Oleksandr & Susilo, Yusak O., 2024. "Are consumers ready to pay extra for crowd-shipping e-groceries and why? A hybrid choice analysis for developing economies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    3. Yang, Dingtong & Hyland, Michael F. & Jayakrishnan, R., 2024. "Tackling the crowdsourced shared-trip delivery problem at scale with a novel decomposition heuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Champahom, Thanapong & Wisutwattanasak, Panuwat & Chonsalasin, Dissakoon & Se, Chamroeun & Jomnonkwao, Sajjakaj & Ratanavaraha, Vatanavongs, 2025. "Comparing Electric Vehicle Adoption Intentions Across Vehicle Types in Thailand: An Extended UTAUT2 Model with Government Participation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 408-435.
    5. Cebeci, Merve Seher & Tapia, Rodrigo Javier & Kroesen, Maarten & de Bok, Michiel & Tavasszy, Lóránt, 2023. "The effect of trust on the choice for crowdshipping services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    6. Wang, Yang & Sun, Yu & Lai, Jianhui & Chen, Yanyan & Holguín-Veras, José, 2025. "An incentive-based delivery scheme and its effect evaluated via explainable machine learning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 559-574.
    7. Yuen, Kum Fai & Chua, Jie Ying & Li, Xue & Wang, Xueqin, 2023. "The determinants of users’ intention to adopt telehealth: Health belief, perceived value and self-determination perspectives," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    8. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Ghaderi, Hadi & Van Woensel, Tom & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G., 2024. "Contextualizing alternative delivery points in last mile delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    9. Zhang, Zhuoye & Zhang, Fangni, 2024. "Optimal operation strategies of an urban crowdshipping platform in asset-light, asset-medium, or asset-heavy business format," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    10. Yuen, Kum Fai & Cai, Lanhui & Wee, Shaun Chuin Kit & Wang, Xueqin, 2024. "Pandemic-driven acceptance of urban drone deliveries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 356-370.
    11. Wang, Yi-Jia & Wang, Yue & Huang, George Q. & Lin, Ciyun, 2024. "Public acceptance of crowdsourced delivery from a customer perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(3), pages 793-805.
    12. Nils Boysen & Stefan Fedtke & Stefan Schwerdfeger, 2021. "Last-mile delivery concepts: a survey from an operational research perspective," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 43(1), pages 1-58, March.
    13. John Olsson & Daniel Hellström & Henrik Pålsson, 2019. "Framework of Last Mile Logistics Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    14. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Lavieri, Patricia Sauri & Ghaderi, Hadi, 2025. "Crowd-shipping systems with public transport passengers: Operational planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    15. Wang, Xueqin & Wong, Yiik Diew & Liu, Feng & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Consumers' paradoxical motives of co-creation: From self-service technology to crowd-sourcing platform," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    16. Behrend, Moritz & Meisel, Frank & Fagerholt, Kjetil & Andersson, Henrik, 2019. "An exact solution method for the capacitated item-sharing and crowdshipping problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 589-604.
    17. Ghaderi, Hadi & Zhang, Lele & Tsai, Pei-Wei & Woo, Jihoon, 2022. "Crowdsourced last-mile delivery with parcel lockers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    18. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Lavieri, Patricia Sauri, 2024. "Public transportation-based crowd-shipping initiatives: Are users willing to participate? Why not?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    19. Alireza Ermagun & Ali Shamshiripour & Amanda Stathopoulos, 2020. "Performance analysis of crowd-shipping in urban and suburban areas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1955-1985, August.
    20. Arun Rai & Sandra S. Lang & Robert B. Welker, 2002. "Assessing the Validity of IS Success Models: An Empirical Test and Theoretical Analysis," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 50-69, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:81:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.