IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v194y2025ics1366554524005076.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowd-shipping systems with public transport passengers: Operational planning

Author

Listed:
  • Mohri, Seyed Sina
  • Nassir, Neema
  • Thompson, Russell G.
  • Lavieri, Patricia Sauri
  • Ghaderi, Hadi

Abstract

This study designs a crowdshipping (CS) delivery system with public transport (PT) passengers at the operational decision-making level. In this system, parcel lockers (PLs) are positioned in PT stations, through which small and light parcels are allocated to passengers for delivery to their final delivery addresses (i.e., performing the last-mile delivery). A probabilistic mathematical model is formulated with behavioural constraints to estimate the probabilities of accepting CS tasks by passengers. The probability is estimated based on a logit function, sensitive to the parcel’s weight, reimbursement amount, and the walking detour required to deliver the parcel to its final destination. The logit model is constructed based on survey data collected from the Greater Sydney (GS) area, Australia. The mathematical model optimises the allocation of delivery tasks to the CS system and PLs, subsequently, incentivising CS-allocated tasks for participating passengers. Furthermore, the model performs the routing of vehicles to deliver non-allocated parcels, including heavy parcels. A heuristic solution algorithm is then proposed to optimise decisions related to allocation, routing, and incentivisation, which was tested on a real case study. By conducting sensitivity analysis on various model parameters, results show that for a small carrier, utilising a PT-based CS system could minimise daily delivery costs by up to 36%, depending on passengers’ rate of familiarity with the CS initiative and the number of PT stations equipped with PLs. Vehicle delivery cost in the CS-integrated delivery system is also reduced between 50% and 65%, in comparison to the conventional vehicle-only system. Our study reveals that a CS system should offer higher incentives at the beginning, and as CS familiarity grows, figures could be reduced depending on other market and operational conditions. Furthermore, simulated experiments suggest that denser PL networks enable carriers to reduce incentives even at earlier stages with lower familiarity rates.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohri, Seyed Sina & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Lavieri, Patricia Sauri & Ghaderi, Hadi, 2025. "Crowd-shipping systems with public transport passengers: Operational planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:194:y:2025:i:c:s1366554524005076
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2024.103916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554524005076
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Janjevic, Milena & Merchán, Daniel & Winkenbach, Matthias, 2021. "Designing multi-tier, multi-service-level, and multi-modal last-mile distribution networks for omni-channel operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(3), pages 1059-1077.
    2. Fessler, Andreas & Thorhauge, Mikkel & Mabit, Stefan & Haustein, Sonja, 2022. "A public transport-based crowdshipping concept as a sustainable last-mile solution: Assessing user preferences with a stated choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 210-223.
    3. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Lavieri, Patricia Sauri, 2024. "Public transportation-based crowd-shipping initiatives: Are users willing to participate? Why not?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    4. Michele D. Simoni & Edoardo Marcucci & Valerio Gatta & Christian G. Claudel, 2020. "Potential last-mile impacts of crowdshipping services: a simulation-based evaluation," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1933-1954, August.
    5. Shichang Pan & Lele Zhang & Russell G. Thompson & Hadi Ghaderi, 2021. "A parcel network flow approach for joint delivery networks using parcel lockers," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(7), pages 2090-2115, April.
    6. Devari, Aashwinikumar & Nikolaev, Alexander G. & He, Qing, 2017. "Crowdsourcing the last mile delivery of online orders by exploiting the social networks of retail store customers," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 105-122.
    7. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Ghaderi, Hadi & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G., 2023. "Crowdshipping for sustainable urban logistics: A systematic review of the literature," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    8. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Ghaderi, Hadi, 2024. "Last-Mile logistics with on-premises parcel Lockers: Who are the real Beneficiaries?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    9. Alnaggar, Aliaa & Gzara, Fatma & Bookbinder, James H., 2021. "Crowdsourced delivery: A review of platforms and academic literature," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    10. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Thompson, Russell, 2022. "Designing sustainable intermodal freight transportation networks using a controlled rail tariff discounting policy – The Iranian case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 59-77.
    11. Ghaderi, Hadi & Zhang, Lele & Tsai, Pei-Wei & Woo, Jihoon, 2022. "Crowdsourced last-mile delivery with parcel lockers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    12. Gössling, Stefan & Kees, Jessica & Litman, Todd, 2022. "The lifetime cost of driving a car," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Ghaderi, Hadi & Van Woensel, Tom & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G., 2024. "Contextualizing alternative delivery points in last mile delivery," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Lavieri, Patricia Sauri, 2024. "Public transportation-based crowd-shipping initiatives: Are users willing to participate? Why not?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Yang, Dingtong & Hyland, Michael F. & Jayakrishnan, R., 2024. "Tackling the crowdsourced shared-trip delivery problem at scale with a novel decomposition heuristic," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Ghaderi, Hadi & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G., 2023. "Crowdshipping for sustainable urban logistics: A systematic review of the literature," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    5. Simona Mancini & Margaretha Gansterer, 2024. "Bundle generation for the vehicle routing problem with occasional drivers and time windows," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 36(4), pages 1189-1221, December.
    6. Marisdea Castiglione & Antonio Comi & Rosita De Vincentis & Andreea Dumitru & Marialisa Nigro, 2022. "Delivering in Urban Areas: A Probabilistic-Behavioral Approach for Forecasting the Use of Electric Micromobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, July.
    7. Rossolov, Oleksandr & Susilo, Yusak O., 2024. "Are consumers ready to pay extra for crowd-shipping e-groceries and why? A hybrid choice analysis for developing economies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    8. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Ghaderi, Hadi, 2024. "Last-Mile logistics with on-premises parcel Lockers: Who are the real Beneficiaries?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    9. Henri Kervola & Erika Kallionpää & Heikki Liimatainen, 2022. "Delivering Goods Using a Baby Pram: The Sustainability of Last-Mile Logistics Business Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-18, October.
    10. Kundu, Tanmoy & Goh, Mark & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2025. "Home delivery vs. out-of-home delivery: Syncretic value-based strategies for urban last-mile e-commerce logistics," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    11. Tapia, Rodrigo J. & Kourounioti, Ioanna & Thoen, Sebastian & de Bok, Michiel & Tavasszy, Lori, 2023. "A disaggregate model of passenger-freight matching in crowdshipping services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    12. Yuwei Yan & Xiaomeng Ma & Yi Song & Ajay Kumar & Ruixian Yang, 2023. "Exploring the interaction and choice behavior of organization and individuals in the crowd logistics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 320(2), pages 1021-1040, January.
    13. Lin Zhou & Yanping Chen & Yi Jing & Youwei Jiang, 2021. "Evolutionary Game Analysis on Last Mile Delivery Resource Integration—Exploring the Behavioral Strategies between Logistics Service Providers, Property Service Companies and Customers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Gleb V. Savin, 2021. "The smart city transport and logistics system: Theory, methodology and practice," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 67-86, October.
    15. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2022. "A Strategic Approach for Promoting Sustainable Crowdshipping in Last-Mile Deliveries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Xiao, Haohan & Xu, Min & Wang, Shuaian, 2023. "A game-theoretic model for crowd-shipping operations with profit improvement strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    17. Wang, Xiuwen & Zhen, Lu & Wang, Shuaian, 2024. "Optimizing an express delivery mode based on high-speed railway and crowd-couriers," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 157-177.
    18. Bathke, Henrik & Hartmann, Evi, 2021. "Accepting a crowdsourced delivery - A choice-based conjoint analysis," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 65-95, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    19. Pasirayi, Simbarashe & Fennell, Patrick B. & Sen, Argha, 2023. "The effect of third-party delivery partnerships on firm value," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Raúl Martín-Santamaría & Ana D. López-Sánchez & María Luisa Delgado-Jalón & J. Manuel Colmenar, 2021. "An Efficient Algorithm for Crowd Logistics Optimization," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:194:y:2025:i:c:s1366554524005076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.