IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v217y2025ics0040162525002045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market-based and non-market-based policies: A quantile approach to environmental technology innovation in G-7 countries

Author

Listed:
  • Destek, Mehmet Akif
  • Özkan, Oktay
  • Tiwari, Sunil

Abstract

Numerous sanctions and incentives are used in different countries to encourage businesses to implement environmental technology. Market-based environmental policies are used in certain nations, whereas non-market-based environmental policies are used in others. However, these rules' ability to effectively guide businesses toward research and development is disregarded. In light of this, the purpose of this research is to examine how market-based environmental policies and non-market-based environmental policies affect environmental technology for G-7 nations at various technological progress levels. For this, unique quantile-on-quantile methods are used to study the years between 1990 and 2020. The results of the empirical analysis show that non-market-based policies is effective in all quantiles for the USA, while market-based policies is successful in all quantiles for Canada and France. Furthermore, differing environmental technology levels for Germany, the UK, Italy, and Japan result in different sorts of successful policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Destek, Mehmet Akif & Özkan, Oktay & Tiwari, Sunil, 2025. "Market-based and non-market-based policies: A quantile approach to environmental technology innovation in G-7 countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:217:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525002045
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162525002045
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124173?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:217:y:2025:i:c:s0040162525002045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.