IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v91y2024ics0038012123002914.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring participation in undeclared work in Europe using survey data: A method for resolving social desirability bias

Author

Listed:
  • Arezzo, Maria Felice
  • Horodnic, Ioana A.
  • Williams, Colin C.
  • Guagnano, Giuseppina

Abstract

Measuring participation in undeclared work using surveys has been criticized for under-estimating the level of engagement due to social desirability bias that leads to an under-reporting of “bad” behavior. Until now, few studies have sought to quantify the amplitude of this bias in surveys of undeclared work. The aim of this paper is to fill this gap by using the most appropriate methodologies for estimating the probability of misleading responses in such surveys. Reporting data from special Eurobarometer survey no. 498 conducted in 2019 and involving 27,565 respondents in EU-27 countries and the UK, only 3.5% openly admitted to participating in undeclared work. The results of a Probit model with correction for misclassified cases (i.e., those undertaking undeclared work but declaring that they do not) reveals that nearly a quarter (23.3%) of the respondents undertaking undeclared work refused to openly admit this during the survey, due to the social desirability bias. The estimated overall proportion of undeclared workers is 17.3%. We obtained this value by correcting for both misclassification and the additional source of negative bias due to the large imbalance in the data (i.e., observations in one class are much lower than the other). The outcome of this new advanced approach in analysing undeclared work is that survey estimates can now report its size and determinants in a more accurate manner than has been previously the case.

Suggested Citation

  • Arezzo, Maria Felice & Horodnic, Ioana A. & Williams, Colin C. & Guagnano, Giuseppina, 2024. "Measuring participation in undeclared work in Europe using survey data: A method for resolving social desirability bias," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0038012123002914
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012123002914
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0038012123002914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.