Author
Listed:
- Liu, Yeshen
- Song, Kaixi
- Xu, Longhui
- Song, Zhe
Abstract
Grounded in expectancy violations theory (EVT), this study examines the impact of corporate Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) ratings on exploitative and exploratory innovation using a sample of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2021. The findings indicate that ESG ratings promote firms’ exploitative innovation while constraining exploratory innovation. Furthermore, we construct a proxy for managerial ESG risks attention using a large language model (LLM) approach, providing empirical support for the theoretical mechanism of EVT. External stakeholder attention amplifies the positive effect of ESG ratings on exploitative innovation and the negative effect on exploratory innovation. Compared to Governance (G), the effects of Environmental (E) and Social (S) are more pronounced in promoting (suppressing) firms’ exploitative (exploratory) innovation. The heterogeneity analysis reveals that firms will place greater emphasis on balancing exploitative and exploratory innovation under conditions of resource abundance (e.g., high organizational slack, low financing constraints, state ownership, limited market competition, and high corporate reputation) and limited technological accumulation. Further analysis demonstrates that firms with higher ESG ratings benefit from exploitative innovation, which drives short- and medium-term performance growth. Overall, our research deepens the understanding of the complex relationship between ESG and corporate innovation.
Suggested Citation
Liu, Yeshen & Song, Kaixi & Xu, Longhui & Song, Zhe, 2026.
"ESG and firms’ exploitative versus exploratory innovation: Evidence from a large language model approach,"
Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:83:y:2026:i:c:s0275531926000322
DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2026.103305
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:83:y:2026:i:c:s0275531926000322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.