IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/lauspo/v140y2024ics0264837724000784.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental regulation and land resource allocation in China: Empirical evidence from micro-level land transaction data

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Zhijiu
  • Ding, Hai
  • Zhu, Wenbo

Abstract

Land resource allocation is closely related to economic activities, which can be affected by environmental regulation. Exploiting the variation in regulation intensity coming from the new Environmental Protection Law (EPL) across time, regions, and industries, we construct a difference-in-difference-in-differences (DDD) model to investigate the impact of environmental regulation on land resource allocation in China. We find that when faced with stringent environmental regulation, local governments are inclined to reduce land supply for polluting industries, which is robust using alternative specifications. Besides, local governments raise the price and the average size of land parcels sold to polluting firms, along with remote land locations and low land quality. Further evidence indicates that local officials, with fewer promotion incentives, tend to reduce land supply for polluting industries substantially, whereas they are more likely to increase land supply for polluting industries under increased economic growth (fiscal) pressure. This study reveals that environmental regulation can direct local land resource allocation towards a green path. Local governments can employ land supply tools to implement environmental governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Zhijiu & Ding, Hai & Zhu, Wenbo, 2024. "Environmental regulation and land resource allocation in China: Empirical evidence from micro-level land transaction data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:140:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724000784
    DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837724000784
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.landusepol.2024.107126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:lauspo:v:140:y:2024:i:c:s0264837724000784. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Joice Jiang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/land-use-policy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.