IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jrpoli/v74y2021ics0301420721003640.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Divergent corporates: Explaining mining companies divergent performance in health impact assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Engebretsen, Rebecca Elisabeth Husebye
  • Brugger, Fritz

Abstract

Large resource extraction projects may give rise to significant environmental, social, and public health externalities. While the environmental impact of extractive projects is regularly considered prior to implementation, few countries have established legal requirements for other forms of impact assessments, including health impact assessments (HIA). Despite the lack of legal requirements, we find that some mining companies operating across Africa are going beyond what is required of them to consider the health impact of their operations. What explains this divergent behaviour? Using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA), we test key explanations of companies’ self-regulating behaviour based on host country, home country or company related conditions. The results confirm that higher performance on HIA is not due to one or two single conditions but a combination of conditions that motivate mining companies to go beyond what is required by them. Our theory-testing contributes to the larger literature discussing companies' propensity to self-regulate. It offers a first step in testing relevant explanations for companies' self-regulatory behaviour in the HIA space, and offering an empirical foundation for future studies wishing to either scale up or scale down to add further granularity to this question in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Engebretsen, Rebecca Elisabeth Husebye & Brugger, Fritz, 2021. "Divergent corporates: Explaining mining companies divergent performance in health impact assessments," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:74:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721003640
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102355
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420721003640
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102355?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kemp, Deanna & Owen, John R., 2013. "Community relations and mining: Core to business but not “core business”," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(4), pages 523-531.
    2. Halkos, George & Nomikos, Stylianos, 2021. "Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 106-117.
    3. Francesco Gangi & Lucia Michela Daniele & Nicola Varrone, 2020. "How do corporate environmental policy and corporate reputation affect risk‐adjusted financial performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(5), pages 1975-1991, July.
    4. Dorothée Baumann-Pauly & Justine Nolan & Auret Heerden & Michael Samway, 2017. "Industry-Specific Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives That Govern Corporate Human Rights Standards: Legitimacy assessments of the Fair Labor Association and the Global Network Initiative," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 771-787, July.
    5. Liliana B. Andonova & Yixian Sun, 2019. "Private Governance in Developing Countries: Drivers of Voluntary Carbon Offset Programs," Global Environmental Politics, MIT Press, vol. 19(1), pages 99-122, February.
    6. Ragin, Charles C., 2000. "Fuzzy-Set Social Science," University of Chicago Press Economics Books, University of Chicago Press, edition 1, number 9780226702773, September.
    7. Contreras, Gabriela & Bos, Jaap W.B. & Kleimeier, Stefanie, 2019. "Self-regulation in sustainable finance: The adoption of the Equator Principles," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 306-324.
    8. Nick Lin-Hi & Igor Blumberg, 2017. "The Power(lessness) of Industry Self-regulation to Promote Responsible Labor Standards: Insights from the Chinese Toy Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 789-805, July.
    9. Pauly, Louis W. & Reich, Simon, 1997. "National structures and multinational corporate behavior: enduring differences in the age of globalization," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 51(1), pages 1-30, January.
    10. Héloïse Berkowitz & Marcelo Bucheli & Hervé Dumez, 2017. "Collectively Designing CSR Through Meta-Organizations: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry," Post-Print hal-02525662, HAL.
    11. Mena, Sébastien & Palazzo, Guido, 2012. "Input and Output Legitimacy of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 527-556, July.
    12. Malhotra, Neil & Monin, Benoãžt & Tomz, Michael, 2019. "Does Private Regulation Preempt Public Regulation?," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 113(1), pages 19-37, February.
    13. Rustad, Siri Aas & Le Billon, Philippe & Lujala, Päivi, 2017. "Has the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative been a success? Identifying and evaluating EITI goals," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 151-162.
    14. Héloïse Berkowitz & Marcelo Bucheli & Hervé Dumez, 2017. "Collectively Designing CSR Through Meta-Organizations: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry," Post-Print hal-02937437, HAL.
    15. Dima Jamali & Ben Neville, 2011. "Convergence Versus Divergence of CSR in Developing Countries: An Embedded Multi-Layered Institutional Lens," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(4), pages 599-621, September.
    16. Diana Robertson, 2009. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Different Stages of Economic Development: Singapore, Turkey, and Ethiopia," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(4), pages 617-633, October.
    17. Tian, Qing & Liu, Yan & Fan, Jianhong, 2015. "The effects of external stakeholder pressure and ethical leadership on corporate social responsibility in China," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 388-410, July.
    18. Rasche, Andreas, 2012. "Global Policies and Local Practice: Loose and Tight Couplings in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(4), pages 679-708, October.
    19. Shanti Gamper-Rabindran & Stephen Finger, 2013. "Does industry self-regulation reduce pollution? Responsible Care in the chemical industry," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 1-30, January.
    20. Heloïse Berkowitz & Marcelo Bucheli & Hervé Dumez, 2017. "Collectively Designing CSR Through Meta-Organizations: A Case Study of the Oil and Gas Industry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 753-769, July.
    21. repec:ucp:bkecon:9780226702766 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Maira Babri & Bruce Davidson & Sven Helin, 2021. "An Updated Inquiry into the Study of Corporate Codes of Ethics: 2005–2016," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 71-108, January.
    23. Sascha Raithel & Manfred Schwaiger, 2015. "The effects of corporate reputation perceptions of the general public on shareholder value," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 945-956, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergey Zhironkin & Dawid Szurgacz, 2021. "Mining Technologies Innovative Development: Economic and Sustainable Outlook," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Heydari, Mehrnoosh & Osanloo, Morteza & Başçetin, Ataç, 2023. "Developing a new social impact assessment model for deep open-pit mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vivek Pandey & Natalia Vidal & Rajat Panwar & Lubna Nafees, 2019. "Characterization of Sustainability Leaders and Laggards in the Global Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Mikkel Kruuse & Kasper Reming Tangbæk & Kristjan Jespersen & Caleb Gallemore, 2019. "Navigating Input and Output Legitimacy in Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives: Institutional Stewards at Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Garaudel, Pierre, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(1).
    4. Haoyuan Ding & Yichuan Hu & Xiyi Yang & Xiaoyu Zhou, 2022. "Board interlock and the diffusion of corporate social responsibility among Chinese listed firms," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 39(4), pages 1287-1320, December.
    5. Li, Huajiao & Ren, Huijun & An, Haizhong & Ma, Ning & Yan, Lili, 2021. "Multiplex cross-shareholding relations in the global oil & gas industry chain based on multilayer network modeling," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    6. Pierre Garaudel, 2020. "Exploring meta-organizations’ diversity and agency: A meta-organizational perspective on global union federations," Post-Print halshs-02474817, HAL.
    7. Luis Fernando Medina & Marcelo Bucheli & Minyoung Kim, 2019. "Good friends in high places: Politico-economic determinants of the expropriation and taxation of multinational firms," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(2), pages 119-141, June.
    8. Julia Rotter & Peppi-Emilia Airike & Cecilia Mark-Herbert, 2014. "Exploring Political Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(4), pages 581-599, December.
    9. Garanina, Tatiana & Kim, Oksana, 2023. "The relationship between CSR disclosure and accounting conservatism: The role of state ownership," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    10. Domenico Dentoni & Verena Bitzer & Greetje Schouten, 2018. "Harnessing Wicked Problems in Multi-stakeholder Partnerships," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(2), pages 333-356, June.
    11. Pisani, Niccolò & Kourula, Arno & Kolk, Ans & Meijer, Renske, 2017. "How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 591-614.
    12. Petya Koleva, 2021. "Towards the Development of an Empirical Model for Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Middle East," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(4), pages 789-813, July.
    13. Thomas M Maak & Nicola M Pless & Christian Voegtlin, 2016. "Business Statesman or Shareholder Advocate? CEO Responsible Leadership Styles and the Micro-Foundations of Political CSR," Post-Print hal-01480535, HAL.
    14. Simone Pizzi & Sara Moggi & Fabio Caputo & Pierfelice Rosato, 2021. "Social media as stakeholder engagement tool: CSR communication failure in the oil and gas sector," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 849-859, March.
    15. Dietz, Thomas & Biber-Freudenberger, Lisa & Deal, Laura & Börner, Jan, 2022. "Is private sustainability governance a myth? Evaluating major sustainability certifications in primary production: A mixed methods meta-study," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    16. Anna-Lena Maier, 2021. "Political corporate social responsibility in authoritarian contexts," Journal of International Business Policy, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(4), pages 476-495, December.
    17. Héloïse Berkowitz & Antoine Souchaud, 2019. "(Self-)Regulation of Sharing Economy Platforms Through Partial Meta-organizing," Post-Print hal-02528015, HAL.
    18. Norma Schönherr, 2022. "Same Same but Different? A Quantitative Exploration of Voluntary Sustainability Standards in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    19. Simona Fiandrino & Francesco Scarpa & Riccardo Torelli, 2022. "Fostering Social Impact Through Corporate Implementation of the SDGs: Transformative Mechanisms Towards Interconnectedness and Inclusiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(4), pages 959-973, November.
    20. Berkowitz, Heloise, 2019. "An ontology of meta-organization: Variations in attributes, functions and profiles," OSF Preprints kc4a3, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jrpoli:v:74:y:2021:i:c:s0301420721003640. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/30467 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.