IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jfpoli/v21y1996i4-5p461-477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The next round: Game theory and public choice perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Vanzetti, David

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Vanzetti, David, 1996. "The next round: Game theory and public choice perspectives," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 21(4-5), pages 461-477.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:21:y:1996:i:4-5:p:461-477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0306-9192(96)00020-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Lloyd & Gary Sampson, 1995. "Competition and Trade Policy: Identifying the Issues After the Uruguay Round," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(5), pages 681-705, September.
    2. Baldwin, Robert E. & Clarke, Richard N., 1987. "Game-modeling multilateral trade negotiations," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 257-284.
    3. Makki, Shiva S. & Tweeten, Luther & Gleckler, James, 1994. "Agricultural trade negotiations as a strategic game," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 71-80, January.
    4. Meester, Gerrit & van der Zee, Frans A, 1993. "EC Decision-Making, Institutions and the Common Agricultural Policy," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 20(2), pages 131-150.
    5. Runge, C. Ford & von Witzke, Harald & Thompson, Shelley, 1987. "Liberal Agricultural Trade As A Public Good: Free Trade Versus Free Riding Under Gatt," Staff Papers 13635, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    6. Jeffrey J. Schott, 1994. "Uruguay Round: An Assessment," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 64, January.
    7. G. Basevi & F. Delbono & M. Mariotti, 1992. "Bargaining with a Heterogeneous Player: An Application to the GATT Uruguay Round," Working Papers 133, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    8. Livingston, Marie L. & von Witzke, Harald, 1992. "Political Economy of International Pollution," 1992 Occasional Paper Series No. 6 197867, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Basevi, Giorgio & Delbono, Flavio & Mariotti, Marco, 1992. "Bargaining with a Composite Player: An Application to the Uruguay Round of GATT Negotiations," CEPR Discussion Papers 685, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Shiva S. Makki & Luther Tweeten & James Gleckler, 1994. "Agricultural trade negotiations as a strategic game," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 10(1), pages 71-80, January.
    11. Harrison, Glenn W & Rutstrom, E E, 1991. "Trade Wars, Trade Negotiations and Applied Game Theory," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 101(406), pages 420-435, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guyomard, Herve & Bureau, Jean-Christophe & Gohin, Alexandre & Le Mouel, Chantal, 2000. "Impact of the 1996 US FAIR Act on the Common Agricultural Policy in the World Trade Organisation context: the decoupling issue," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 17-34, February.
    2. Hervé Guyomard & Katell le Bris, 2003. "Multifunctionality, agricultural trade and WTO negotiations: a review of interactions and issues," ENARPRI Working Papers 004, ENARPRI (European Network of Agricultural and Rural Policy Research Institutes).
    3. Tristan Le Cotty & Anthony Aumand & Tancrêde Voituriez, 2003. "Multifonctionnalité et coopération multilatérale Une analyse du coût de fourniture de biens publics par l'agriculture," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 273(1), pages 91-102.
    4. Herve Guyomard & Katell Le Bris, 2003. "Multifunctionality, agricultural trade and WTO negotiations : a review of interactions and issues [Multifonctionnalité, échanges agricoles et négociations à l'OMC : une synthèse des interactions et," Post-Print hal-02825715, HAL.
    5. Guyomard, Herve & Le Bris, Katell, 2003. "Multifunctionality, Agricultural Trade and WTO Negotiations: A Review of Interactions and Issues," ENARPRI Working Papers 25135, European Network of Agricultural and Rural Policy Research Institutes (ENARPRI).
    6. Jean-Christophe Bureau & Alexandre Gohin & Hervé Guyomard & Chantal Le Mouël, 1996. "CAP response to the 1996 US FAIR Act," Post-Print hal-01593995, HAL.
    7. Gohin, Alexandre & Guyomard, Hervé, 2000. "The Agenda 2000 CAP Reform in the WTO Context: Distortion Effects of Compensatory Payments and Area Set-aside Requirements," 2000 Conference, August 13-18, 2000, Berlin, Germany 197222, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fertő, Imre, 1999. "A Európai Unió közös agrárpolitikájának gazdaságtana II. A CAP politikai gazdaságtana [The economics of the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy, Part II. The political economy of CAP]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 813-822.
    2. Herve Guyomard & Louis Pascal Mahe & Terry L. Roe, 1994. "L'agriculture au GATT et la nouvelle PAC : la fin d'une exception ?," Post-Print hal-01593896, HAL.
    3. Luther Tweeten & Carl Zulauf, 2008. "Farm price and income policy: lessons from history," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 145-160.
    4. Paqué, Karl-Heinz & Stehn, Jürgen & Horn, Ernst-Jürgen & Scharrer, Hans-Eckart & Koopmann, Georg, 1996. "National technology policies and international friction: Theory, evidence, and policy options," Kiel Discussion Papers 279, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    5. Tweeten, Luther G., 1999. "Trade, Uncertainty And New Farm Programs," Economics and Sociology Occasional Papers - ESO Series 28330, Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics.
    6. Eric Giraud-Heraud & Pierre-Alain Jayet & Yves Le Roux & . Inra - Esr. Département d'Economie Et Sociologie Rurales, Ivry, 1994. "Politique agricole commune et stratégie des Etats membres : coopération et intégration," Post-Print hal-02306166, HAL.
    7. Sen, Rahul & Narayanan, Badri & Srivastava, Sadhana & Khorana, Sangeeta & Iyer, Chidambaran, 2020. "The Long-term Impact of Trade Wars and ‘Make in India on the Indian Economy," Conference papers 330229, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Anania, Giovanni, 2001. "Modeling Agricultural Trade Liberalization. A Review," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20758, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Luther G. Tweeten, 2001. "Directions of U.S. Farm Programmes under a Freer Trade Environment," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 40(2), pages 89-105.
    10. J. Mutti & R. Sampson & B. Yeung, 2000. "The effects of the Uruguay round: empirical evidence from U.S. industry," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(1), pages 59-69, January.
    11. Jaime de Melo & David Tarr, 2015. "VERs under imperfect competition and foreign direct investment: A case study of the US–Japan auto VER," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Modeling Developing Countries' Policies in General Equilibrium, chapter 22, pages 461-483, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    12. Guyomard, Herve & Mahe, Louis Adrien Pascal & Roe, Terry L. & Tarditi, Secondo, 1993. "The Cap Reform And Ec-Us Relations: The Gatt As A "Cap" On The Cap," Working Papers 14432, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    13. Avalos, Marcos & Schatán, Claudia, 2004. "Condiciones de competencia en el contexto internacional: Cemento, azúcar y fertilizantes en Centroamérica," EGAP Working Papers 2004-08, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Campus Ciudad de México.
    14. Michael D. Bordo & Barry Eichengreen & Douglas A. Irwin, 1999. "Is Globalization Today Really Different than Globalization a Hunderd Years Ago?," NBER Working Papers 7195, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Staiger, Robert W., 1995. "International rules and institutions for trade policy," Handbook of International Economics, in: G. M. Grossman & K. Rogoff (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 29, pages 1495-1551, Elsevier.
    16. Furusawa, Taiji & Wen, Quan, 2002. "Disagreement points in trade negotiations," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 133-150, June.
    17. J. David Richardson, 2000. "The WTO and market-supportive regulation: a way forward on new competition, technological and labor issues," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 82(Jul), pages 115-130.
    18. William R. Cline, 1995. "Evaluating the Uruguay Round," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23, January.
    19. Ian Wooton & Maurizio Zanardi, 2002. "Trade and Competition Policy: Anti-Dumping versus Anti-trust," Working Papers 2002_6, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow, revised Oct 2002.
    20. Halkos, George, 1994. "A game-theoretic approach to pollution control problems," MPRA Paper 33259, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jfpoli:v:21:y:1996:i:4-5:p:461-477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/foodpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.