IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/deveco/v35y1997i2p142-165.html

The Uruguay Round And The Developing Countries: Thailand And The Philippines

Author

Listed:
  • Peter G. WARR

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter G. WARR, 1997. "The Uruguay Round And The Developing Countries: Thailand And The Philippines," The Developing Economies, Institute of Developing Economies, vol. 35(2), pages 142-165, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:deveco:v:35:y:1997:i:2:p:142-165
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/j.1746-1049.1997.tb00842.x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colleen Hamilton & John Whalley, 1995. "Evaluating the Impact of the Uruguay Round Results on Developing Countries," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 31-49, January.
    2. Jeffrey J. Schott, 1994. "Uruguay Round: An Assessment," Peterson Institute Press: All Books, Peterson Institute for International Economics, number 64, January.
    3. Codsi, george & Pearson, K & Wilcoxen, Peter, 1991. "General-Purpose Software for Intertemporal Modelling," Impact Project Archive 295065, Impact Research Centre, University of Melbourne.
    4. Trien Nguyen & Carlo Perroni & Randall Wigle, 1995. "A Uruguay Round Success?," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 25-30, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pradeep Kumar Mehta, 2001. "Post-Seattle Environment: Developing Countries at the Crossroads," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 121-134, February.
    2. Wannaphong Durongkaveroj & Taehyun Ryu, 2019. "Relative effects of trade liberalization on poverty: Evidence from Thailand," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 19(4), pages 264-283, October.
    3. Warwick J. McKibbin & K. K. Tang, 2000. "Trade and Financial Reform in China: Impacts on the World Economy," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(8), pages 979-1003, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter G. Warr & Helal Ahammad, 1997. "Food aid, food policy and the Uruguay round: implications for Bangladesh," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 15(3), pages 169-185, January.
    2. Arunanondchai, Jutamas May, 2003. "Applied general equilibrium analysis of trade liberalisation on land-based sectors in Malaysia and Indonesia," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 25(9), pages 947-961, December.
    3. J. Mutti & R. Sampson & B. Yeung, 2000. "The effects of the Uruguay round: empirical evidence from U.S. industry," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 18(1), pages 59-69, January.
    4. Michael D. Bordo & Barry Eichengreen & Douglas A. Irwin, 1999. "Is Globalization Today Really Different than Globalization a Hunderd Years Ago?," NBER Working Papers 7195, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Samuel K. Gayi, 2006. "Does the WTO Agreement on Agriculture Endanger Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa?," WIDER Working Paper Series RP2006-60, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    6. J. David Richardson, 2000. "The WTO and market-supportive regulation: a way forward on new competition, technological and labor issues," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 82(Jul), pages 115-130.
    7. Chad P. Bown, 2004. "Developing Countries as Plaintiffs and Defendants in GATT/WTO Trade Disputes," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 59-80, January.
    8. William R. Cline, 1995. "Evaluating the Uruguay Round," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 1-23, January.
    9. Ian Wooton & Maurizio Zanardi, 2002. "Trade and Competition Policy: Anti-Dumping versus Anti-trust," Working Papers 2002_6, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow, revised Oct 2002.
    10. Smith, Vincent H., 1997. "Nafta, Gatt, And Agriculture In The Northern Rockies And Great Plains," Special Reports 29175, Montana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics, Trade Research Center.
    11. Lovely, Mary E., 1997. "Playing by the new subsidy rules: capital subsidies as substitutes for sectoral subsidies," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(3-4), pages 463-482, November.
    12. Guash, J. Luis & Rajapatirana, Sarath, 1998. "Total strangers or soul mates? - antidumping and competition policies in Latin America and the Caribbean," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1958, The World Bank.
    13. David Collie, 2000. "A Rationale for the WTO Prohibition of Export Subsidies: Strategic Export Subsidies and World Welfare," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 229-245, July.
    14. Kathleen Macmillan, 2001. "Doing the Right Thing: The WTO and the Developing World," The State of Economics in Canada: Festschrift in Honour of David Slater, in: Patrick Grady & Andrew Sharpe (ed.),The State of Economics in Canada: Festschrift in Honour of David Slater, pages 267-289, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    15. Lovely, Mary E., 1995. "Economic Development in a Global Context: Implications of the Uruguay Round for Federal Tax Policy," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 48(3), pages 397-407, September.
    16. Robert W. McGee & Yeomin Yoon, 1998. "Korea and the World Trade Organization: Problems and Prospects," International Trade 9805006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Patrick Messerlin, 2015. "How open are public procurement markets?," RSCAS Working Papers 2015/89, European University Institute.
    18. Eichengreen, Barry & Odell, John, 1996. "The United States, the ITO, and the WTO: Exit Options, Agent Slack, and Presidential Leadership," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt5kx5755f, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    19. Adrian Kay & Robert Ackrill, 2008. "Institutional change in the international governance of agriculture: a revised account," NBS Discussion Papers in Economics 2008/4, Economics, Nottingham Business School, Nottingham Trent University.
    20. Peng Xu, 1997. "Effect Of Multi‐Fiber Arrangement Trade Restrictions On Textile Industry Profit Margins," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 15(3), pages 93-102, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:deveco:v:35:y:1997:i:2:p:142-165. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/idegvjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.