Compliance with veterinary prescriptions: The role of physical and social risk revisited
This study replicates and extends prior research related to human health prevention programs by examining why pet owners comply with therapeutic prescriptions issued by their veterinarian. Empirical data demonstrates that overall, people comply according to physical, but above all, social risk. However, the influence of physical risk depends on the relationships in the pet-owner-veterinarian triad and becomes most effective when trust toward the veterinarian and/or attachment to the pet are high.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Beverland, Michael B. & Farrelly, Francis & Lim, Elison Ai Ching, 2008. "Exploring the dark side of pet ownership: Status- and control-based pet consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(5), pages 490-496, May.
- Keller, Punam Anand & Block, Lauren Goldberg, 1996. " Increasing the Persuasiveness of Fear Appeals: The Effect of Arousal and Elaboration," Journal of Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(4), pages 448-59, March.
- Moorman, Christine & Matulich, Erika, 1993. " A Model of Consumers' Preventive Health Behaviors: The Role of Health Motivation and Health Ability," Journal of Consumer Research, University of Chicago Press, vol. 20(2), pages 208-28, September.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:66:y:2013:i:1:p:141-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Zhang, Lei)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.