IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v111y2020icp91-101.html

Who do I look at? Mutual gaze in triadic sales encounters

Author

Listed:
  • Arndt, Aaron D.
  • Khoshghadam, Leila
  • Evans, Kenneth

Abstract

Mutual gaze (i.e., eye contact) is linked to both positive outcomes such as trust and liking, and negative outcomes such as dominance and hostility. When selling to multiple people, salespeople must decide how to divide mutual gaze between customers. Too much or little time spent looking at a particular customer could reduce rapport. This research addresses two research questions: (1) Are salespeople more inclined to share mutual gaze with certain customers? And (2) What is the effect of mutual gaze focused primarily on one particular customer compared to sharing mutual gaze with both customers more equitably? Real sales encounters were analyzed and two follow-up experimental studies were conducted. The results show that salespeople tend to share mutual gaze with customers who are similar when first meeting, and those who speak more. Sharing mutual gaze equitably between customers when first meeting is typically more beneficial than focusing on a particular customer.

Suggested Citation

  • Arndt, Aaron D. & Khoshghadam, Leila & Evans, Kenneth, 2020. "Who do I look at? Mutual gaze in triadic sales encounters," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 91-101.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:111:y:2020:i:c:p:91-101
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296319301134
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.023?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davis, Harry L, 1976. "Decision Making within the Household," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 2(4), pages 241-260, March.
    2. Cross, Samantha N.N. & Gilly, Mary C., 2014. "Consumption compromises: Negotiation and unification within contemporary families," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 449-456.
    3. Arndt, Aaron D. & Karande, Kiran & Glassman, Myron, 2016. "How context interferes with similarity-attraction between customers and service providers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 294-303.
    4. Haridimos Tsoukas, 2009. "A Dialogical Approach to the Creation of New Knowledge in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(6), pages 941-957, December.
    5. Gremler, Dwayne D. & Gwinner, Kevin P., 2008. "Rapport-Building Behaviors Used by Retail Employees," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 308-324.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cambra-Fierro, Jesús & Polo-Redondo, Yolanda & Trifu, Andreea, 2021. "Short-term and long-term effects of touchpoints on customer perceptions," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Amin, Mohammad Sakif & Arndt, Aaron D. & Tanner, Emily C., 2023. "Impact of stereotype threat on sales anxiety," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Matthias Doepke & Michèle Tertilt, 2019. "Does female empowerment promote economic development?," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 309-343, December.
    2. Liu, Chihling & Keeling, Debbie Isobel & Hogg, Margaret K., 2016. "Strategy narratives and wellbeing challenges: The role of everyday self-presentation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 234-243.
    3. Alessandra Mazzei & Alfonsa Butera, 2016. "Brand consistent behavior of employees on social media: the role of social media governance and policies," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(4), pages 85-106.
    4. Anders Melander & Tomas Mullern & David Anderssson & Fredrik Elgh & Malin Löfving, 2022. "Bridging the Knowledge Gap in Collaborative Research—in Dialogues We Trust," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(5), pages 655-677, October.
    5. Guangfan Sun & Xin Lin & Junyi Chen & Nuo Xu & Ping Xiong & Hanqi Li, 2023. "Cultural inclusion and corporate sustainability: evidence from food culture and corporate total factor productivity in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    6. Maria Margarida Avillez & Andrew Greenman & Susan Marlow, 2020. "Ethical Judgments About Social Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Influence of Spatio-Cultural Meanings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(4), pages 877-892, February.
    7. Lina Mao & Guangfan Sun & Yining He & Shanshan Zheng & Changwei Guo, 2024. "Regional cultural inclusiveness and firm performance in China," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Ameet Sao & Sagar Mohite & Stuti Jain & Gautam Bapat, 2022. "Evaluating Relationship between CRM, Customer Satisfaction and Client Loyalty in Indian Real Estate," Acta Universitatis Bohemiae Meridionalis, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, vol. 25(2), pages 113-125.
    9. Jun Nagayasu, 2021. "Life Cycles and Gender in Residential Mobility Decisions," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 62(3), pages 370-401, April.
    10. Alexandra Moskovskaya, 2016. "Electronic ‘Knowledge Factories’ versus Micro-environment of Innovation: Who Will Win?," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 81-91.
    11. Lorino, Philippe & Mourey, Damien & Schmidt, Géraldine, 2017. "Goffman's theory of frames and situated meaning-making in performance reviews. The case of a category management approach in the French retail sector," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 32-49.
    12. Wang, Shouyang & Chin, Tachia, 2020. "A stratified system of knowledge and knowledge icebergs in cross-cultural business models: Synthesising ontological and epistemological views," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 26(4).
    13. Nguyen Hong Phuoc & Le Nguyen Hau & Pham Ngoc Thuy, 2022. "The dual outcomes of frontliner’s autonomous motivation and deep acting in service co-creation: a dyadic approach," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(1), pages 159-186, March.
    14. Edirisingha, Prabash & Aitken, Robert & Ferguson, Shelagh, 2022. "Setting up home: The role of domestic materiality in extended family identity formation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-15.
    15. Marshall, Alasdair & Ojiako, Udechukwu & Wang, Victoria & Lin, Fenfang & Chipulu, Maxwell, 2019. "Forecasting unknown-unknowns by boosting the risk radar within the risk intelligent organisation," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 644-658.
    16. Roel Rutten & Irawati Dessy, 2011. "Knowledge Creation In Temporary Regional Networks," ERSA conference papers ersa10p535, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Hervé Dumez & Etienne Minvielle, 2020. "Le système hospitalier français dans la crise Covid-19," Working Papers hal-03053359, HAL.
    18. Dant, Rajiv P. & Brown, James R., 2008. "Bridging the B2C and B2B Research Divide: The Domain of Retailing Literature," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 84(4), pages 371-397.
    19. Simón, Cristina & Revilla, Elena & Jesús Sáenz, Maria, 2024. "Integrating AI in organizations for value creation through Human-AI teaming: A dynamic-capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Edoardo Fregonese & Isabella M. Lami & Elena Todella, 2020. "Aesthetic Perspectives in Group Decision and Negotiation Practice," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 993-1019, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:111:y:2020:i:c:p:91-101. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.