IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/forpol/v160y2024ics1389934123002216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors influencing forestland enrollment in Georgia's preferential property tax programs

Author

Listed:
  • Chhetri, Sagar Godar
  • Li, Yanshu
  • Hepinstall-Cymerman, Jeffery
  • Siry, Jacek
  • Gordon, Jason

Abstract

More than two-thirds of Georgia's private forestland (or 14.6 million acres) are enrolled in one of the state's preferential property tax programs. Besides alleviating property tax burdens for rural landowners, the purposes of these incentive programs have gradually evolved from ensuring a sustainable supply of agricultural and timber products to promoting the conservation of rural open space and provision of ecosystem services. This study examined the factors associated with forestland enrollment in Georgia's major current-use tax programs using a combination of parcel-level spatial data, property tax roll, and county-level economic data for all private forestland in the study counties. A multilevel logistic regression model was used to control the effects of hierarchical data structure. A forest parcel's size, tax savings, neighboring parcel enrollment, land value, land productivity, landowner's residence status in relation to the property, development potential (e.g., distance to cities, county population density) as well as distance to lakes and identified conservation areas are important predictors of its likelihood of being enrolled in the property tax incentive programs. Larger forest parcels, located close to identified potential conservation areas, characterized by high soil productivity, held by non-absentee owners, and adjacent to enrolled parcels were more likely to be enrolled in the current-use tax programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Chhetri, Sagar Godar & Li, Yanshu & Hepinstall-Cymerman, Jeffery & Siry, Jacek & Gordon, Jason, 2024. "Factors influencing forestland enrollment in Georgia's preferential property tax programs," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:160:y:2024:i:c:s1389934123002216
    DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1389934123002216
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:forpol:v:160:y:2024:i:c:s1389934123002216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.