IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/finana/v95y2024ipbs1057521924003958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Administrative monopoly and state-owned enterprise innovation: Evidence from the fair competition review system in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Xingquan
  • Zhang, Kexin
  • Liao, Guanmin
  • Gao, Pengfei

Abstract

This study examines the impact of administrative monopoly on corporate innovation, specifically focusing on the Fair Competition Review System (FCRS) implemented in China. Based on Chinese A-share listed firms from 2012 to 2020, we use the implementation of the FCRS as a natural experiment to conduct a difference-in-difference test. Our findings show that the FCRS significantly increases the level of innovation among SOEs through the mechanisms of resource acquisition and market competition. The incentive effect is not only at the strategic innovation level but also promotes the improvement of the substantive innovation level of SOEs. The heterogeneity test indicates that improvements stemming from the FCRS are more pronounced in specific functional categories, regions with poor business environments, and state-owned enterprises in industries that receive key policy support. Finally, our study also reveals that the FCRS promotes the input-output efficiency of innovation among SOEs. This research contributes to the literature by filling the research gap on the impact of administrative monopoly on corporate innovation, providing novelty evidence on the economic consequences of regulatory administrative monopoly, and offering policy insights regarding the FCRS.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Xingquan & Zhang, Kexin & Liao, Guanmin & Gao, Pengfei, 2024. "Administrative monopoly and state-owned enterprise innovation: Evidence from the fair competition review system in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PB).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:95:y:2024:i:pb:s1057521924003958
    DOI: 10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057521924003958
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103463?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fair competition review system; Corporate innovation; State-owned enterprise; Administrative monopoly; Competitive neutrality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • G38 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • L40 - Industrial Organization - - Antitrust Issues and Policies - - - General
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:finana:v:95:y:2024:i:pb:s1057521924003958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620166 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.